If you didn’t sell the house you’d be good now!An increase in the money supply is what set the stage for all kinds of moral hazard and asymmetrical information in the housing market.
If you didn’t sell the house you’d be good now!An increase in the money supply is what set the stage for all kinds of moral hazard and asymmetrical information in the housing market.
Why do you lick these brief little eras when things went “off the rails?” Why would you buy a house at a 17% mortgage? Try to make sense.When you answer the questions I posed you will find your answer. And please try to stay on point without going off the rails. What do teaser rates have to do with a 17% interest rate back in the late 70s?
Do the math and then let me know how well your investment would have worked out for you back then.
In the 70’s we werenʻt subsidizing debt like we are now. Not surprising that messy finds private lending a weird concept when in the 70’s, if you were a saver then you were easily a lender.When you answer the questions I posed you will find your answer. And please try to stay on point without going off the rails. What do teaser rates have to do with a 17% interest rate back in the late 70s?
Do the math and then let me know how well your investment would have worked out for you back then.
The bank doesnʻt care about that. They get paid regardless. Does your “asset” do that?You don’t know what an asset is. Sometimes assets appreciate and sometimes they depreciate.
Especially if youʻre the lender. They get paid every month by the borrower who also buys default insurance (PMI) for the lender as a part of their monthly payment. Does your asset do that?Real estate is the best asset to have.
Not as good as the bank is.If you didn’t sell the house you’d be good now!
Because of the inverse relationship between interest rates and home prices.Why would you buy a house at a 17% mortgage?
No. I think it’s because the buyer is a dummy.Because of the inverse relationship between interest rates and home prices.
You’re not the bank. Banks are institutions. Simple rule is you do great in real estate...but don’t live above your means.Not as good as the bank is.
Once again you don’t understand. The lender is an institution. The buyer isn’t. Your only choice is to be a buyer. Or not, so stay poor while you read your backwards-ass economics analyses. Try actually doing things.Especially if youʻre the lender. They get paid every month by the borrower who also buys default insurance (PMI) for the lender as a part of their monthly payment. Does your asset do that?
People buy more homes when money is cheap, less homes when money is expensive. The housing industry responds to higher interest rates by lowering home prices. Questions?No. I think it’s because the buyer is a dummy.
When you answer the questions I posed you will find your answer. And please try to stay on point without going off the rails. What do teaser rates have to do with a 17% interest rate back in the late 70s?
Do the math and then let me know how well your investment would have worked out for you back then.
The bank doesnʻt care about that. They get paid regardless. Does your “asset” do that?
Especially if youʻre the lender. They get paid every month by the borrower who also buys default insurance (PMI) for the lender as a part of their monthly payment. Does your asset do that?
And you can deduct the interest on your taxes.No. I think it’s because the buyer is a dummy.
That’s why they get you to pay for their PMI so that they don’t lose money if that happens. Dude there is no way you’re a real estate guy.The bank can lose money if they foreclose on a property and sell it for less than the remaining principal on the loan.
Why do you lick these brief little eras when things went “off the rails?” Why would you buy a house at a 17% mortgage? Try to make sense.
And you can deduct the interest on your taxes.
That’s why they get you to pay for their PMI so that they don’t lose money if that happens. Dude there is no way you’re a real estate guy.
No questions. Advice. Pull your head out of your sophomoric readings and actually engage in commerce. Real estate and otherwise. You will learn much more that way.People buy more homes when money is cheap, less homes when money is expensive. The housing industry responds to higher interest rates by lowering home prices. Questions?
Watch this Einstein:How did they lose their asses in real estate? Predatory lending practices that Republicans don’t want to curb? Teaser rates that they get duped into taking by the banks?