Bruddah IZ
DA
Nobody helped Trump more than Hillary, Comey, Bernie and you people.
Essential Economics for Politicians
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
-
- Tags
- finance too
Bruddah IZ
DA
It’s not what’s on those taps that has him freaked out. It’s that those taps existed at all.
We knew Russia was "meddling" in the election long before the vote was taken.
The Obama administration was aware of it.
"Meddling" does make colluding & the CIA determined no votes were changed in the Presidential election.
Are you sure you understand counselor?
The irony......
Obama White House Knew of Russian Election Hacking, but Delayed Telling
By EMMARIE HUETTEMANJUNE 21, 2017
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration feared that acknowledging Russian meddling in the 2016 election would reveal too much about intelligence gathering and be interpreted as “taking sides” in the race, the former secretary of homeland security said Wednesday.
“One of the candidates, as you recall, was predicting that the election was going to be ‘rigged’ in some way,” said Jeh Johnson, the former secretary, referring to President Trump’s unsubstantiated accusation before Election Day. “We were concerned that by making the statement we might, in and of itself, be challenging the integrity of the election process itself.”
entire article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/21/us/politics/jeh-johnson-testimony-russian-election-hacking.html
Russia's role is shocking but there's no evidence the vote was hacked
By Joshua A. Douglas
Updated 6:16 PM ET, Mon December 12, 2016
(CNN)The revelations that Russia actively sought to influence the American election and help Donald Trump become the next president are shocking, mind-blowing and downright scary. But here is something they are not: evidence that the Russians hacked voting machines or changed the Election Day count. Unsubstantiated assertions that Russia actually manipulated the vote tally are themselves dangerous.
News reports have said that the CIA concluded Russia sought to influence the election result, particularly by providing WikiLeaks with emails that Russia obtained by hacking the servers of the Democratic National Committee and Democratic individuals.
The Russians may still be holding onto information they hacked from the RNC servers. These facts, which the intelligence community knew about even before the election, should send shivers down the spines of all Americans. They are what prompted a bipartisan group in Congress, as well as Hillary Clinton spokesman John Podesta, to demand further investigation and public disclosure of what exactly Russia did to influence the campaign. Understanding what happened is vitally important, so the intelligence community should act quickly to assuage Americans' concerns.
entire article"
https://www.cnn.com/2016/12/12/opinions/russia-role-shocking-but-not-hacked-douglas/index.html
By Joshua A. Douglas
Updated 6:16 PM ET, Mon December 12, 2016
(CNN)The revelations that Russia actively sought to influence the American election and help Donald Trump become the next president are shocking, mind-blowing and downright scary. But here is something they are not: evidence that the Russians hacked voting machines or changed the Election Day count. Unsubstantiated assertions that Russia actually manipulated the vote tally are themselves dangerous.
News reports have said that the CIA concluded Russia sought to influence the election result, particularly by providing WikiLeaks with emails that Russia obtained by hacking the servers of the Democratic National Committee and Democratic individuals.
The Russians may still be holding onto information they hacked from the RNC servers. These facts, which the intelligence community knew about even before the election, should send shivers down the spines of all Americans. They are what prompted a bipartisan group in Congress, as well as Hillary Clinton spokesman John Podesta, to demand further investigation and public disclosure of what exactly Russia did to influence the campaign. Understanding what happened is vitally important, so the intelligence community should act quickly to assuage Americans' concerns.
entire article"
https://www.cnn.com/2016/12/12/opinions/russia-role-shocking-but-not-hacked-douglas/index.html
Correct. Russia was meddling via information that was fake in an attempt to sway voters. Glad you acknowledge that. The ongoing investigation is to determine if Trump and co unlawfully conspired with them in doing so. Of course, the investigator has a broad mandate so all of the ongoing lying and coverup has led him to expand the investigation to determine if money laundering is involved, etc. These are simple facts upon which you and i seem to agree. Go tell your friend Joe.
The CIA was aware of this as it was happening...I posted this info a year ago...
Do you honestly believe they would be aware of the Russian hacking and not aware of some collusion by the "Trump team"....?
The fact that their is a special council investigating & by all accounts the administration is cooperating indicates a cover up to you?
I've never met Joe, but I know he can read what you just posted on his own. But thanks counselor.
Sheriff Joe
DA
No one is disputing anything in you post, except the lying and cover up part, it's the ifs that are the most factual words in your post.
This might just end up being fruit from a poisoned tree.
Fruit from the poisonous tree is the evidence rule I’m talking about. No matter how authentic or incriminating the evidence of a crime may be, it can be suppressed if it was gathered through unconstitutional means.
Bruddah IZ
DA
When you knowingly send 8 Top Secret e-mails and 30 plus Secret e-mails via an unsecured server that our intelligence agencies were well aware of and, then point to a conspiracy elsewhere, that's the real conspiracy. LMAO! Where do they get you people from?
Bruddah IZ
DA
Speaking of fruit from the poisonous forest. When you knowingly send 8 Top Secret e-mails and 30 plus Secret e-mails via an unsecured server that our intelligence agencies were well aware of and, then point to a conspiracy elsewhere, that's the real conspiracy. LMAO! Where do they get you people from?
You and Joe should be doing this investigation! Let’s tell Mueller! You guys are the real pros...just listen to you!
Bruddah IZ
DA
"What are you scared of?"
Not my investigation. I have no stake in the results, so therefore no fear. You and Joe are the experts. Fruit of poisonous tree, he mentioned. You mentioned top secret emails. Go get ‘em! I will await the results of your investigation and Mueller’s investigation, how’s that? Remind me of your credentials as a lawyer or investigator, please?
Sheriff Joe
DA
So now you want to wait? I thought you had already convicted him.
Super Bowl LII final ratings are the lowest in 9 years
James Hibberd
February 05, 2018 AT 11:24 AM EST
UPDATED: Sunday’s Super Bowl fell to its lowest ratings in nine years.
Despite what fans considered a strong game — with the Philadelphia Eagles winning their first Super Bowl in a 41-33 victory over defending champion the New England Patriots — the telecast delivered “only” 103.4 million viewers — the biggest TV audience since the previous Super Bowl, as one might expect, yet also the lowest turnout since 2009.
NBC pointed out that the last time the Patriots and Eagles met in the Super Bowl the game drew far less — 86.1 million viewers — but that was in 2005 when Super Bowl ratings tended to be lower. Ratings for the big game were gradually rising for decades … until they seemed to plateau starting in 2011 at around 111 million total viewers. Every game since has been between 108 and 114 million until this year.
The ratings decline wasn’t entirely unexpected given the viewership decreases the NFL has endured overall the last couple years. NBC points out that the margin between the Super Bowl’s overnight ratings and the NFL Playoffs was the largest ever — basically, that the big game performed really well relative to the popularity of the season.
Also, in some good ratings news for NBC: The network’s presentation of This Is Us had the biggest post-Super Bowl entertainment telecast rating in six years despite the big game slouching.
NFL is a losing franchise unless the Business model is changed !
That model change is contingent on the PLAYERS acting like human
beings instead of PUPPETS !
James Hibberd
February 05, 2018 AT 11:24 AM EST
UPDATED: Sunday’s Super Bowl fell to its lowest ratings in nine years.
Despite what fans considered a strong game — with the Philadelphia Eagles winning their first Super Bowl in a 41-33 victory over defending champion the New England Patriots — the telecast delivered “only” 103.4 million viewers — the biggest TV audience since the previous Super Bowl, as one might expect, yet also the lowest turnout since 2009.
NBC pointed out that the last time the Patriots and Eagles met in the Super Bowl the game drew far less — 86.1 million viewers — but that was in 2005 when Super Bowl ratings tended to be lower. Ratings for the big game were gradually rising for decades … until they seemed to plateau starting in 2011 at around 111 million total viewers. Every game since has been between 108 and 114 million until this year.
The ratings decline wasn’t entirely unexpected given the viewership decreases the NFL has endured overall the last couple years. NBC points out that the margin between the Super Bowl’s overnight ratings and the NFL Playoffs was the largest ever — basically, that the big game performed really well relative to the popularity of the season.
Also, in some good ratings news for NBC: The network’s presentation of This Is Us had the biggest post-Super Bowl entertainment telecast rating in six years despite the big game slouching.
NFL is a losing franchise unless the Business model is changed !
That model change is contingent on the PLAYERS acting like human
beings instead of PUPPETS !
No! You’re assuming, because of course I think he’s a jerk and trying to be a dictator. I don’t know anything about the results of the wiretaps or whether he’s guilty. I’m awaiting an investigation to finish, but he and you keep screaming that everything is fake. I’m saying that it’s a Republican-led investigation and trump heartily endorsed the Chief investigator mueller and now he and his supporters are trying to derail it. I find that very suspicious, but I am not an idiot who screams “lock him up” when I don’t know what the F I’m talking about. People who do that are bad for the country. I have no idea if he’s guilty of anything except being a total creep who wants to be a dictator.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Why would I remind you of that which is not true? I can only remind you of that which is true:
Bruddah IZ
DA
Mueller is doing damage control given the facts in my previous post.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Cool, that is not the impression you display here.
Just trying to keep the deniers in line.