Essential Economics for Politicians

In his activity in support of free trade, Bright was motivated above all by a concern for the plight of ordinary people. From the same motive, he opposed all the legislation which regulated working conditions in factories. The Factory Act of 1847 was in part a retaliation by the landowners for the corn law repeal: regulation of factories was a means of penalizing manufacturers. Bright was certain that it would make people worse off by reducing the number of hours in which they could earn money.

Espola will remember a similar case years later as the Lochner vs. New York case of 1905
 
Economics vs. Politics II. The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics.”

Politics deals with the same problem by making promises that cannot be kept, or which can be kept only by creating other problems that cannot be acknowledged when the promises are made.
--Sowell
 
We easily forget the economic rationale that Marx taught us, namely, that socialism would have to provide unprecedented abundance if it were to sustain social liberation of any kind. With a few notable exceptions, leftists no longer find it fashionable to discuss economics at all beyond the now routine rejection of a "command economy" and some disingenuous mumbling about the necessity for markets. But where is there a serious attempt to determine the extent to which any socialism could function without a command economy or to show how a socialist economy could integrate markets? A few left-wing economists, most notably Louis Ferleger and Jay Mandle, tried to raise these questions long before the collapse of the socialist economies, but they were effec- tively shut out of the left-wing press and are still ignored. And we may doubt that the wry remark of Nancy Folbre and Samuel Bowles, two other respected left-wing economists, will cause a wrinkle: "Leftwing economists— among whom we count ourselves—have thus far failed to come up with a convincing alternative to capitalism." (Nancy Folbre and Samuel Bowles, letter to the Nation, Nov. 29, 1993; and see also, Louis Ferleger and Jay R.Mandle, A New Mandate: Democratic Choices for a Prosperous Economy, University of Missouri Press, 1994).--Genovese
 
Bruddah IZ said:
We easily forget the economic rationale that Marx taught us, namely, that socialism would have to provide unprecedented abundance if it were to sustain social liberation of any kind. With a few notable exceptions, leftists no longer find it fashionable to discuss economics at all beyond the now routine rejection of a "command economy" and some disingenuous mumbling about the necessity for markets. But where is there a serious attempt to determine the extent to which any socialism could function without a command economy or to show how a socialist economy could integrate markets? A few left-wing economists, most notably Louis Ferleger and Jay Mandle, tried to raise these questions long before the collapse of the socialist economies, but they were effec- tively shut out of the left-wing press and are still ignored. And we may doubt that the wry remark of Nancy Folbre and Samuel Bowles, two other respected left-wing economists, will cause a wrinkle: "Leftwing economists— among whom we count ourselves—have thus far failed to come up with a convincing alternative to capitalism." (Nancy Folbre and Samuel Bowles, letter to the Nation, Nov. 29, 1993; and see also, Louis Ferleger and Jay R.Mandle, A New Mandate: Democratic Choices for a Prosperous Economy, University of Missouri Press, 1994).--Genovese
Click to expand...
You've fallen for and into a trap.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
It shows he never hit 3%, the only president evah.
Click to expand...
Gee, what happened just before he took office you disingenuous political hack?

So which is it? I would say ones politics and the questioned asked has much to do with the outlook these days . . .

A decade after the financial crisis hit, 52 percent of Americans say they are still feeling its impact on their pocketbooks, according to a new report by Morning Consult.

Still, large majorities (74 percent) say their financial health is fair, good or excellent, though only 11 percent put themselves in the latter category.

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/3...icans-still-feeling-impact-of-great-recession
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Gee, what happened just before he took office you disingenuous political hack?

So which is it? I would say ones politics and the questioned asked has much to do with the outlook these days . . .

A decade after the financial crisis hit, 52 percent of Americans say they are still feeling its impact on their pocketbooks, according to a new report by Morning Consult.

Still, large majorities (74 percent) say their financial health is fair, good or excellent, though only 11 percent put themselves in the latter category.

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/3...icans-still-feeling-impact-of-great-recession
Click to expand...
I will give him some cover for hiz first term, but that's all he gets.
This iz trumps economy, get over it.
You elected a bum in 08 and in 12, he was so bad the people would rather have the pussy grabber that American Hero killing whore you nominated, this iz all your fault, whatever happens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top