Bruddah IZ
DA
So Vanilla isn't he?What the hell?
I said we would rebuild and bail out as usual.
Probably without a thank you, thank you.
This is one of your standards, btw. "everyman for himself" lol.
So Vanilla isn't he?What the hell?
I said we would rebuild and bail out as usual.
Probably without a thank you, thank you.
This is one of your standards, btw. "everyman for himself" lol.
I have a list of his simple mindedness.So Vanilla isn't he?
I didn't know Vanilla was so varied.I have a list of his simple mindedness.
The list only goes up to five.
There are hundreds of variations of vanilla.I didn't know Vanilla was so varied.
Part of his racist bent I guess.There are hundreds of variations of vanilla.
Rat, five.
Somebody Q Wez's crying baby. I guess I hurt his feelings this morn'.
I'm your sheep dog while you count sheep.Dream on.
I'm your sheep dog while you count sheep.
Dream on.
Don't flatter yourself.You're barely off ignore, stop with the delusions of grandeur...
So you are saying you see that in a positive light or will you go noncommittal like always?What the hell?
I said we would rebuild and bail out as usual.
Probably without a thank you, thank you.
This is one of your standards, btw. "everyman for himself" lol.
So you are saying you see that in a positive light or will you go noncommittal like always?
From the article, it sounds like unions argue for minimum wage hikes because it benefits them and also harms non-union labor.The ‘Fight For 15’ Is Another Tool For Big Businesses To Kill Competition
https://fee.org/articles/the-fight-for-15-is-another-tool-for-big-businesses-to-kill-competition/
The Real Beneficiaries
For instance, if the minimum wage was $8 and the union wage was $40, employers give up 5 hours of low-skilled work for every union worker-hour utilized. But if the minimum hourly wage were increased to $10, employers would only be foregoing 4 hours of low-skilled work for every union worker-hour employed. Consequently, it is no wonder unions, whose self-interests are advanced whether or not low-skill workers benefit, are the primary backers of minimum wage campaigns.
Big businesses can sustain government mandated incremental wage increases where small business cannot. Big business isn't doing anything wrong. Government is.From the article, it sounds like unions argue for minimum wage hikes because it benefits them and also harms non-union labor.
So they make more money. What are they doing wrong then? I didn't really get the part about how it helps big business.
well, if you take that libertarian-ish view that markets work when everyone acts in their best interest, you have a point...and big business isn't doing anything wrong. the problem is the government's "best interest" is big business, so that skews things. the unions aren't doing anything wrong either. but small business peopleBig businesses can sustain government mandated incremental wage increases where small business cannot. Big business isn't doing anything wrong. Government is.
well, if you take that libertarian-ish view that markets work when everyone acts in their best interest, you have a point...and big business isn't doing anything wrong. the problem is the government's "best interest" is big business, so that skews things. the unions aren't doing anything wrong either. but small business people
don't have groups like organized labor or the chamber of commerce or the elected officials helping them. it's a bummer.
Both the Union and Government extract wages from business rather than letting the market decide.well, if you take that libertarian-ish view that markets work when everyone acts in their best interest, you have a point...and big business isn't doing anything wrong. the problem is the government's "best interest" is big business, so that skews things. the unions aren't doing anything wrong either. but small business people
don't have groups like organized labor or the chamber of commerce or the elected officials helping them. it's a bummer.
You're barely off ignore, stop with the delusions of grandeur...