Essential Economics for Politicians

Projecting again I see. Your math has been under scrutiny for years now with no attempt on your part to add clarity to your assertions (same as for your questionable financial ramblings), just more mud in the water.
Like you annual 2% raises.
 
Au contraire, seems it is you who have the difficulty making your message clear . . . is it because you have no real message just more obfuscation? You need to muddy the waters so your true self can't be seen, like t.
You mustnʻt mistake your opacity for the clear understanding of others.
 
Blaming others for your iliteracy suits you. I thought third grade math would be easy enough. I was wrong.
Your propensity to attempt weaving riddles, most likely gleaned from the plumbers similar attempts, comes up short when in the end you don't even know the answer. The punchline, so to speak, comes when the riddler reveals the simplicity of the answer sought.
. . . and misspelling "iliteracy' (sic) when questioning my literacy is quite ironic you might admit, but you can't.
 
Projecting again I see. Your math has been under scrutiny for years now with no attempt on your part to add clarity to your assertions (same as for your questionable financial ramblings), just more mud in the water.
listen, poor guy says he's a fan of the president and he doesn't even understand leveraged debt.
 
Lmao! Affirmation does not reside in “someone”.
Nice try dizzy, you can't win so you spin, really is sad to watch (but I'm sure one of the others in your he-man, compensating for your insecurity club will come to your defense). Man up and have some pride in yourself.
 
Your propensity to attempt weaving riddles, most likely gleaned from the plumbers similar attempts, comes up short when in the end you don't even know the answer. The punchline, so to speak, comes when the riddler reveals the simplicity of the answer sought.
. . . and misspelling "iliteracy' (sic) when questioning my literacy is quite ironic you might admit, but you can't.
To the easily riddled, life is a riddle.
 
dizzy, like yourself are into word soup . . . I notice you, nor diz have ever illuminated any of us with your "simple" translation thereof, because it is garbled BS. People that are good at things make it look easy, you nor diz can achieve that so you choose obfuscation instead.


If you tickle " Nadler " in his " Nethers " he might just burp up a Skittle.
If you fondle the " Schiff " on his " Standard " he might just give a Buck.
If you pickle the " Lieu " thru the " Diddle " he will most certainly Squirm.
 
Is that the new name for your asset?
Which asset? The stocks, the bonds, the cash or the houses? You do know they are all "assets," don't you? Maybe not.
And it is true that I have about $2.5m in "collateralized debt" against a couple of those assets...which definitely makes them worth $2.5m less than if I didn't have that debt!
You see how simple that is, Iz? Do you understand how it works?
No need to talk in riddles, like you do because you're so confused.
It's simple and clear.
 
Back
Top