coachrefparent
GOLD
LOTG #TROLLONMust? Where did you get that?
LOTG #TROLLONMust? Where did you get that?
Really?. . . Tell me when you see a professional game stop mid attack. It doesn't happen.
1978. Yeah that is relevant, however I did ask to tell me when so I guess 1978 is when it happened.Really?
I could have posted one from last Saturday but what good would that have done you given your urban myth belief regarding the issue?1978. Yeah that is relevant, however I did ask to tell me when so I guess 1978 is when it happened.
OK, so it happens. It just won't in any game I am reffing.I could have posted one from last Saturday but what good would that have done you given your urban myth belief regarding the issue?
OK, so it happens. It just won't in any game I am reffing.
Good for you.OK, so it happens. It just won't in any game I am reffing.
There is a proposal on the table now for reducing the periods from 45 minutes to 30 minutes but stop the clock for every stoppage. That is supposedly going to stop time wasting.One change I would support - time is kept by a clock or by another official. When time runs out, the game ends on the next dead-ball situation.
Doesn't sound good to me. Neither does the video referee stuff. Goal line technology I think is fine, but taking the human element out of this game, like some of the other sports have done, I don't like it.....There is a proposal on the table now for reducing the periods from 45 minutes to 30 minutes but stop the clock for every stoppage. That is supposedly going to stop time wasting.
Doesn't sound good to me. Neither does the video referee stuff. Goal line technology I think is fine, but taking the human element out of this game, like some of the other sports have done, I don't like it.....
I agree that this would be the solution. Why is it hard to have time kept by a clock held by the AR? Then when time was up, a buzzer would sound that we could all hear signaling the end of the game. No confusion. How about that?One change I would support - time is kept by a clock or by another official. When time runs out, the game ends on the next dead-ball situation.
it means taking the human element out of the game."taking the human element out of this game" -- what does that mean?
it means taking the human element out of the game.
Doesn't sound good to me. Neither does the video referee stuff. Goal line technology I think is fine, but taking the human element out of this game, like some of the other sports have done, I don't like it.....
That sort of thing can be, and sometimes is, handled by the governing body after the fact. Yes I saw that video. Referees should have done more..... In my opinionI agree. Did you happen to see the melee towards the end of the Mexico-New Zealand game? Clear video of at least one punch to the head and despite the fact that the CR reviewed the video, no punishment. That's not VAR's fault but its still up the judgment of the Ref, so VAR in some ways is meaningless.
He is not talking about humans dear.The number of humans involved in any game will remain the same.
He is not talking about humans dear.
Right . . ."it means taking the human element out of the game."