RL schedules are up on the websiteSeedlings are up. All matches are included.
RL schedules are up on the websiteSeedlings are up. All matches are included.
Good luck to all the ECRL teams playing this weekend. For the West, it's 8 teams from the Southwest with 2 pools of 4 teams. I believe both winners of their respective pools go to the ECRL National Championship.
Also pool play for the ECNL 2010s came out and the Socal teams looks like they all got good draws. For the most part, looks like they used the seeding which included showcase games vs the qualifier which was only conference games. Surf is with the Dallas Texans and that should be a good match. Koge and Penn Fusion should be a fun match as well. I wouldn't be surprised if at least 3 of the Socal teams make it out of pool play. Based on the Soccer Ranking app, 5 of the 6 Socal teams are the highest ranked team in their group. Should be some fun matches to see how we match up against the rest of the competition.
There are also 4 ECRL teams from the Northwest Conference and 4 from NorCal Conference that will be in the West Playoff Brackets for some age groups. Two Brackets of 8 teams. The two finalist will go to Finals next month and play against the other regions two top teams.
Based upon the groups released yesterday, this appears to be accurate. So in summary:Historically, conference winners take the top seeds. Assuming this, the top 10 seeds will go to conference winners by pts/game - IIRC pts/game NOT including showcases. The Champions League Standing includes showcases. So, you can't necessarily use those to determine the order of the Top 10. It's even possible that a 2nd place conference team is above a conference winner in the Champions League Standings if there is a difference in the Showcase results. You'd have to go back to each Conference, find the winner, and use their conference record pts/game to determine the top 10 seeds. For the remaining "wildcards", they used the Champion's League Standing pts/game, which includes the Showcases. I never saw this in writing but was able to "back into" this logic using the first-round matchups for the oldest group last year. It might be different this year as the conferences have significantly changed. It would seem odd that the Southwest, with 17 teams only gets a single "conference winner" - same as the New England conference with 8 teams.
This is very cool but should have been occurring for all games throughout the season.LIVE STREAM
FYI from ECNL:
HUDL: Hudl will be on site to provide live streaming of every game at the ECNL Girls National Playoffs event. To stay involved in the action, CLICK HERE or visit https://team1sports.com/ecnl/.
Don't want to give leagues/clubs any ideas but I'm even ok with paying for streaming solutions per game as long as the stream is high quality.
Here's how you do it...Nobody is setting up a satellite truck for kid soccer, so it will always come down to cell network speed and availability at most locations that won't have their own outdoor wireless network. This has gotten better over time - but it's still hit or miss. Some sites will have 5G available at 500+ mbps for hundreds of cell devices. Others will have barely usable 4G with 3 mbps that slows to a crawl when more then 5 people are trying to connect at once. Streams from the former will look as good as the camera can capture, good luck with the latter.
Just to be clear, this provides bonding for 8 5g Sim cards (8 cell phones) together in a single stream that can run off batteries + is completely portable.Bonding multiple 5G cards together makes sense, especially from different providers - comes down to the price point for the incremental improvement. Can't imagine it makes sense for individuals who balk at Veo & Trace pricing already, but perhaps there are use cases where it would make sense for a club, league, or particular location.
I think it depends on the club size + if you’re doing remote tournaments in the 2-3 weeks. I do admit 2-3 weeks is likely very aggressive.I don't see the back of the envelope math as quite so favorable. 8 data cards are going to run $300 - $500/mo. There's the cost of this gadget, plus the cost of local wireless if you're trying to connect these streams for more than one game at a time, plus whatever is used for cameras, plus the management of the streams and the monetization part on the backend. There may very well be a profit in that business, but I'm not sure what the margins would look like - and I'm pretty sure the ROI estimate of 2-3 weeks even for just this one piece is wildly optimistic.
There is baller.tv that shows up at most of the basketball tournaments we attend. It's a cell phone on a tripod, placed next to every court. They are all indoor facilities, so I was assuming they were wirelessly connecting to a fixed network from the facility rather than only using the cell network, but I don't know for sure. It looks like they do other sports as well - including the Surf Cup Olders in Del Mar and the Surf Cup Youngers in Oceanside later this summer. I wonder what the setup will be for outdoors. Subs for it aren't cheap (see below from here).
View attachment 17321
To clarify, it appears that it doesn't take sim cards. It looks like it takes data cards (that require a sim card in each of them).