let’s not take anything away from the defending World Champs here.
No they don't lose a game unless Heat can pull off another upset like they did in Vegas cup but Slammers have recently beat Heat in Regionals and Surf cup. I don't see any other competitive match for them in ECNL. Maybe they should play upBit of a topic shift- but with the 05 Slammers team that made it to Hawaii and just won Surf Cup pretty much owning So Cal and most others over the past 2 years- Have they considered playing up a year?
Or having some players play up? (Maybe they already have/do).
With Slammers going all in with ECNL- does this team lose a game over the next 12 months?
This data is from Youth Soccer Rankings. Far West Regional record is not listed there. Might be a few other things missing or incorrect. But damn impressive!No they don't lose a game unless Heat can pull off another upset like they did in Vegas cup but Slammers have recently beat Heat in Regionals and Surf cup. I don't see any other competitive match for them in ECNL. Maybe they should play up
Egos.U15s lost today (2-0) vs Portugal in the U15 Concacaf tourney. 17 of the 18 on the roster are from DA. Only one ECNL. As long as we have this kind of bias, our national teams are in trouble. Not saying the girls aren't talented on the roster, but are we really getting the best? I'm not sure with this model.
U15s lost today (2-0) vs Portugal in the U15 Concacaf tourney. 17 of the 18 on the roster are from DA. Only one ECNL. As long as we have this kind of bias, our national teams are in trouble. Not saying the girls aren't talented on the roster, but are we really getting the best? I'm not sure with this model.
Honestly, I'm not trying to make a big deal of the loss.., but it is a sympton of a larger problem which is selectivty based on what league you play in. This you cannot deny. I'm not blaming the league itself but I am blaming the folks running it and making decisions based on ego as Sheriff Joe mentions above.The US team has many 2004's and 2005's while most teams are consistent mostly of 2003's. Also I heard they lost on two pks. Pretty difficult to draw any conclusions with just one game lost.
People how is this dumb? Look at the numbers... they're not right. It's biased. Again, I'm not bagging on the kids that are there, but the selection process is super flawed because of league bias.U15s lost today (2-0) vs Portugal in the U15 Concacaf tourney. 17 of the 18 on the roster are from DA. Only one ECNL. As long as we have this kind of bias, our national teams are in trouble. Not saying the girls aren't talented on the roster, but are we really getting the best? I'm not sure with this model.
I find it hard to 100% blame DA for losses. Aren't the people that are coaching the DA teams the same people that were coaching ECNL 18 months ago?
And if our current US Womens National Team (Senior team and U23/20) are struggling because the rest of the world has caught up and is playing a more technical game than we are- Isn't ECNL partially to blame for that? ECNL was the "best league" around for the past 8 years, right?
The US team has many 2004's and 2005's while most teams are consistent mostly of 2003's. Also I heard they lost on two pks. Pretty difficult to draw any conclusions with just one game lost.
People how is this dumb? Look at the numbers... they're not right. It's biased. Again, I'm not bagging on the kids that are there, but the selection process is super flawed because of league bias.
I find it hard to 100% blame DA for losses. Aren't the people that are coaching the DA teams the same people that were coaching ECNL 18 months ago?
And if our current US Womens National Team (Senior team and U23/20) are struggling because the rest of the world has caught up and is playing a more technical game than we are- Isn't ECNL partially to blame for that? ECNL was the "best league" around for the past 8 years, right?
The US team has many 2004's and 2005's while most teams are consistent mostly of 2003's.
I “think” US Soccer cares most about the full senior team. So maybe by sacrificing a loss in a youth national team game, USSF feels that playing younger players gives us a better chance at remaining on top when these players are adults.So this incompetence by US Soccer for not taking more 03’s right? That’s your excuse for the loss, so they f’d up by not taking more 03’s, whose fault is that?
So this incompetence by US Soccer for not taking more 03’s right? That’s your excuse for the loss, so they f’d up by not taking more 03’s, whose fault is that?
I “think” US Soccer cares most about the full senior team. So maybe by sacrificing a loss in a youth national team game, USSF feels that playing younger players gives us a better chance at remaining on top when these players are adults.
But probably not. They probably just took players they knew would be loyal to DA or that had a connection with USSF or were willing to give up time at the mall or going on a family vacation to play a silly tournament.
Dude it’s just one loss. Take a chill pill.
Just calling you out on being so quick to make an excuse. Your knee-jerk excuse actually put you in a “logical” hole because either what Dubs said is right or US Soccer is incompetent for not taking more 03’s.
If you would have omitted the “excuse” I would agree with you that one game doesn’t tell the whole story. In fact I watched most of the 1st half of the Jamaica game and they looked damn good! Crisp, clean passing, nice midfield play, and very creative in the final 3rd. They looked 1000x better than the U-20’s. But again, I only watched one half and it was against Jamaica.