Climate and Weather

Speculation vs. What is true or what can be observed. Alarmist are in denial about the environment.
 
VennGMOs-1.png
 
Seriously? Did you even watch the video? He's a scientist not just a businessman. And didn't just own the Weather Channel.. he founded it.

He has no formal science training. He has a degree in journalism, and he learned meteorology standing in front of a TV weather map cracking corny jokes.
 
He has no formal science training. He has a degree in journalism, and he learned meteorology standing in front of a TV weather map cracking corny jokes.
And was a Weatherman for how many years? Yea, he doesn't know anything about the Weather or Climate. He has no credentials..
 
The ideologues love to parade the 3% up and down the runway.

"See, see, I knew it!!"
They seem to have just a few examples of each issue that go in their favor that they parade around as if that makes up for the overwhelming majority that don't. They line them all up in the corner with Thomas Sowell and Ben Carson . . . that's why Sarah Palin was such a hit with them, the token female.
 
I forgot.. your drinking. Watch again when you've sobered up.

It's okay to say "well I didn't know that, but I still think he made good points."

I'll just be honest, global warming is to complex for me to understand so I have to rely on the opinion of scientists. And pretty much all of them, across the world and across all political stripes- believe humans are effecting the Earths atmosphere in a way that is going to have harmful and costly effects. Moreover I grew up watching the country's air and water get cleaned up under Nixon's environmental laws. So I'm very receptive to the idea that we can still make money and be successful- while having clean air and water. I've lived it-

No matter what the founder of the Weather Channel says... he's probably not going to change my mind.
 
It's okay to say "well I didn't know that, but I still think he made good points."

I'll just be honest, global warming is to complex for me to understand so I have to rely on the opinion of scientists. And pretty much all of them, across the world and across all political stripes- believe humans are effecting the Earths atmosphere in a way that is going to have harmful and costly effects. Moreover I grew up watching the country's air and water get cleaned up under Nixon's environmental laws. So I'm very receptive to the idea that we can still make money and be successful- while having clean air and water. I've lived it-

No matter what the founder of the Weather Channel says... he's probably not going to change my mind.
Of course he wonʻt change your mind. YOUR job and YOUR Ohana is more important than the environment as they should be.
 
It's okay to say "well I didn't know that, but I still think he made good points."

I'll just be honest, global warming is to complex for me to understand so I have to rely on the opinion of scientists. And pretty much all of them, across the world and across all political stripes- believe humans are effecting the Earths atmosphere in a way that is going to have harmful and costly effects. Moreover I grew up watching the country's air and water get cleaned up under Nixon's environmental laws. So I'm very receptive to the idea that we can still make money and be successful- while having clean air and water. I've lived it-

No matter what the founder of the Weather Channel says... he's probably not going to change my mind.
I agree with most of what you posted. The point he makes on the video about following the $$ is a real problem. If the supporters of the Global Warming Theory are getting paid to support the theory then there is a good chance their data is flawed. He also mention 30k climate scientist who don't support GWT and surprisingly they don't get government funding.

Back in my racing days we would joke about the product of the month. These companies would pay to have their supplements certified that they produce results and keep doing it until they got the results they wanted.

Go look at historic temp charts that go back more then just 300 years. Really makes you wonder what other motivation might be driving this.
 
He also mention 30k climate scientist who don't support GWT and surprisingly they don't get government funding.

http://www.snopes.com/30000-scientists-reject-climate-change/

Not All Climatologists
More than 30,000 people may have signed a petition challenging the veracity of anthropogenic global warming, but you don’t have to be a climate scientist, or even a practicing scientist, to sign that document.

The petition was created by individuals and groups with political motivations, was distributed using misleading tactics, is presented with almost no accountability regarding the authenticity of its signatures, and asks only that you have received an undergraduate degree in any science to sign.
 
Back
Top