Wez
DA
Maybe someone should just ask what University did you get your Phd. from?
I'm not claiming Scientific knowledge. Unlike the right, that prefers notions that feel right, I prefer to listen to what experts have to say.
Maybe someone should just ask what University did you get your Phd. from?
You prefer to be told what to think.I'm not claiming Scientific knowledge. Unlike the right, that prefers notions that feel right, I prefer to listen to what experts have to say.
You prefer to be told what to think.
Feels right?I'm not claiming Scientific knowledge. Unlike the right, that prefers notions that feel right, I prefer to listen to what experts have to say.
How much did it cost to put those ten letters after your name?Ironic you say that about me, in light of Climate Science deniers being wholly funded by fossil fuel interests...
Feels right?
What are you talking about?
Tell us Wez, what are going to do today to stop climate change?
Ignoramus.I'm not claiming Scientific knowledge. Unlike the right, that prefers notions that feel right, I prefer to listen to what experts have to say.
How much did it cost to put those ten letters after your name?
Id ask for my money back.
Ignoramus.
please continue.ad hominem +2
I believe the climate changes and always has and always will.http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/...on-was-emphasizing-feelings-over-facts/211865
Accept the fact that ACC could be real to start with. Listen to what our experts are saying and weigh that against policy proposals presented to us and decide which ones make the most sense.
I gotta million of em...!
I believe the climate changes and always has and always will.
I don't accept that we can control climate change any more that we can control earthquakes, tidal waves or volcanos.
So, shall we have one big final bar-b-que and then start eating soy burgers?
I gotta million of em...!
Im just repeating my alter ego's littany of ad hominem retorts.Perhaps you'd be willing to truncate that list a bit. Or just not share them all.
If I were to guess, I may deduce that large, warm blooded, "reptiles", may have gone bye bye, due to a lack of food. I know, duh..Why's you switch out Gilligan? Since the baseline is a running average, what's above it and below it will change. So what's minus and what's plus in your subsequent post only tells you which way the baseline is trending. But you're right that the absolute amplitude between the high and low points over a time period is indeed a fixed fluctuation value that you can look at. The magnitude of metemperature change has certainly been larger over earth history. But the rate of change right now is what draws attention. Fastest rate of change over the entire Holocene according to the models and proxies. JMO we'll ride out whatever may or may not be in store and muddle along. It's what we do. But if we keep talking like this Iz is going to come charging in here with alarm this and alarm that like there's a herd of badgers digging up his kalo patch and trying to scratch their way into his chicken coop. So we need to find a way to cast a long cold eye. If you're the type to mull over a good paper, consider the last stand of the ichthyosaurs about a 100 million years ago. You can read all about it here, and its a freebie (PMC link upper right).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26953824
Increasingly genetically bottlenecked, climate changing faster than they could adapt, what's a lizard-like fish to do? Old Charlie stole the handle and the train it won't stop going no way to slow down.