Bruddah IZ
DA
He's so cute when he makes your point by not reading both what he post and you post.I am glad you do.
He's so cute when he makes your point by not reading both what he post and you post.I am glad you do.
Tree huggers good, oil companies bad.What argument?
Tree huggers good, oil companies bad.
You need better representation, Al Gore, Obama and Leo, what a bunch of douches.I have no problem with oil, I use it everyday. When fossil fuel funded junk science pollutes an honest discussion of AGW, then there is a problem.
You need better representation, Al Gore, Obama and Leo, what a bunch of douches.
Yes it does.Go ahead shoot the messengers, doesn't change the discussion.
What "limited budgets" are being spent on selling AGW?
Having a hard time figuring out the chart?What "limited budgets" are being spent on selling AGW?
Yes.Having a hard time figuring out the chart?
Yes.
There are no numbers.
I would like to know how much actual money from all sources, is being spent selling AGW, vs. how much exactly, is being spent to argue against it.
Your chart is more like a shart, then.Lol, good luck with that, sounds easily measureable.
Maybe Exxon reports that on form # "we-burntheearthup"
Your chart is more like a shart, then.
Its crap.Shocking you wouldn't like it...i would have never guessed.
Its crap.
What did you expect?
No.That's your response to reality in general.