Climate and Weather

Wikipedia is not a valid source.
I have changed wikipedia errors myself.
I did so while researching one of my ancestors.

What was wrong with the article you corrected? Have you gone back to see how your effort was recorded in the history file attached to that article?

It is interesting that you use your experience in correcting errors in Wikipedia as evidence of its invalidity. As I have stated many times, it is a good starting point.
 
What was wrong with the article you corrected? Have you gone back to see how your effort was recorded in the history file attached to that article?

It is interesting that you use your experience in correcting errors in Wikipedia as evidence of its invalidity. As I have stated many times, it is a good starting point.
The changes I made are still there.
Had I not changed them, my assumption is that the wiki "facts" would still be wrong.
 
Apparently the plumber is the self-appointed smartest man in the room. If there was a mistake he knew it right off and it needed correcting! Next he'll cross check Webster's.

I have made corrections, changes, and additions to some Wikipedia articles myself. Anyone can do it (which some people claim is a weakness), and all changes are subject to review and arbitration (one of its lesser-known strengths).
 
Back
Top