You can lead a fool to knowledge, but you can't make him think.
Climate and Weather
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
You can lead a fool to knowledge, but you can't make him think.
Dam, E. You have been listening to Coolio?
Hüsker Dü
DA
You really must be acting, no one is that dumb . . . and why do you hate working people so?
Sheriff Joe
DA
I guess you can't answer.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Say 'Green New Deal' three times to a mirror, and who shows up? Al Gore!
FEBRUARY 22, 2019
The former vice president was found rabble-rousing recently in Virginia for his pet cause: catastrophic global warming.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...mes_to_a_mirror_and_who_shows_up_al_gore.html
FEBRUARY 22, 2019
The former vice president was found rabble-rousing recently in Virginia for his pet cause: catastrophic global warming.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...mes_to_a_mirror_and_who_shows_up_al_gore.html
Sheriff Joe
DA
So you do have an opinion on global warming.
I don’t have an opinion on gravity.
I don’t have an opinion on whether 2 hydrogen molecules combined with 1 oxygen molecule make water.
I don’t have an opinion on man-made climate change.
I don’t have an opinion on whether smoking is harmful.
If I didn’t accept these facts, I would be an ignorant idiot.
Do you have an opinion on the existence of gravity? As a magnetic force? Seems silly, doesn’t it?
Or how about the one that says the moon causes the tide? Kooky, right? What’s your opinion?
So they move their money offshore instead of circulating it through the economy.
Now what?
You got a rotten apple in your bushel, and dont sell yourself short.
You're an incredibly ignorant idiot.
Sheriff Joe
DA
You said you didn't have an opinion global warming and I am just pointing out your lie.
His opinion is that it's "settled science", like gravity.
He doen't know why he believes that, other than he's been told by "experts".
Its a surprisingly common opinion.
Surprisingly?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Lemming's are that way.
I am guessing he isn't a 3%er.
I don’t. Did you not read my post? It’s not an opinion.
It’s not an opinion, numbskull. It’s a fact...just like water is 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen. Show us your graphs on that issue, idiot...
Hüsker Dü
DA
A rhetorical? . . . or do you seriously not see your hypocrisy? In that case I refer you back to my post you just responded to.
Let me get this perfectly straight. In no way do I want to misrepresent your opinion on this.
You believe anthropogenic global warming is on an equal scientific footing with the gravitational theory, and the composition of H2O, correct?
Hüsker Dü
DA
You are conversing with flat earth, the moon isn't real/so we never landed on it, Sandy Hook was a "red-flag"hoax performed by liberal operatives, the Parkland kids are all actors(and really horrible people), Clive Bundy is an American hero types. They see the likes of The National Enquired and Tucker Carlson as serious journalism.
Hüsker Dü
DA
You seriously bow to the wealthy don't ya?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Sounds like an opinion to me.
I know that question was not directed to me, but allow me to respond. That is the gist of the current scientific findings, based on work by Arrhenius over 100 years ago that was part of the work cited in his Nobel Prize award confirmed by careful observations made before and since then.
If you do not agree with any scientific finding or doctrine, the accepted way to change those is by some mathematical derivation or series of observations. Notable examples of such revolutions in scientific thought have been Newton's mathematical treatment of gravity, Einstein's special relativity mathematics (which explained why the Michelson-Morley experiments of a few years before had found no evidence of the "luminiferous ether"), and Wegener's compilation of geological observations that led to the modern theory of plate tectonics. If you don't have anything of that level of care and rigor, or you cannot cite someone who does, you are just displaying your ignorance and/or your willingness to be taken in by political hacks.