Amazing that back in the 1920s someone was taking this data down...
So did this information surprise you? Did you think it's wrong?
Not reading the thread?
Amazing that back in the 1920s someone was taking this data down...
So did this information surprise you? Did you think it's wrong?
Now that's funny.Not reading the thread?
Around three inches.
Doesnt seem out of the ordinary to me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosquer_Cave
Not reading the questions?Not reading the thread?
Not reading the questions?
So measurements off of a manmade structure built in the ocean? I wonder if the pier has settled at all since it was built... hmmm.No, I was not surprised. SIO has been making daily (and in some cases continuous now) measurements since soon after their first pier was built. The data is more reliable than some bonehead comments attached to old photographs.
So measurements off of a manmade structure built in the ocean? I wonder if the pier has settled at all since it was built... hmmm.
No, I was not surprised. SIO has been making daily (and in some cases continuous now) measurements since soon after their first pier was built. The data is more reliable than some bonehead comments attached to old photographs.
You didn't answer the question.
Did you look at the map on the link you just provided? If this map is supposed to back you up well then once again you have failed.
The original pier opened in 1916, when the oceanographic institute was 13 years old and struggling to become a prominent center of science. Philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps put up $36,000 to build the 1,000-foot-long structure, where scientists studied the marine environment and routed water to laboratories onshore.No, I was not surprised. SIO has been making daily (and in some cases continuous now) measurements since soon after their first pier was built. The data is more reliable than some bonehead comments attached to old photographs.
So the measurements are off of two different piers? Hmmm
Did you look at the map on the link you just provided? If this map is supposed to back you up well then once again you have failed.
What... you didn't see I had already posted that? So the measurements are off of two different structures.The new pier was built in 1988, side by side with the old one, and then after all the gadgets had been moved, the old pier was torn down.
Ill give you a chance. What point are you trying to make with the information you have posted? Ill wait...Failed what?
Ill give you a chance. What point are you trying to make with the information you have posted? Ill wait...
Failed what?
So it appears that, based on the link you posted from NOAA, that the level has gone up in La Jolla. I don't find that alarming or surprising. What I do find surprising is that if you travel North on the map you will see that, according to your link, sea levels have gone down.My recent interest in this thread was sparked by the claim that the sea level at La Jolla Cove was exactly the same as in 1871. I know that Scripps Institute (a little over a mile up the coast from La Jolla Cove) measures sea level (among other things) so I looked to see what they had available as public data.
So it appears that, based on the link you posted from NOAA, that the level has gone up in La Jolla. I don't find that alarming or surprising. What I do find surprising is that if you travel North on the map you will see that, according to your link, sea levels have gone down.
Sounds like your hockey stick.The level measured at some coastal stations has gone down, and at some stations it has gone up more than at La Jolla. The point in question was La Jolla Cove.