Climate and Weather

Multi Sport said:
It's not my term. You appear to be lacking in your knowledge when it comes to the graph you posted. Maybe it shouldn't come as a surprise to me. Richard likes all your post, and like Richard, you are depending too much on Google.

You're doing your best to appear kmowlegable in a subject that you're not. Kinda like Richard claiming to be a Cryptographer... I threw him a basic term that any Crytographer worth his salt would know and he failed.

To your credit, you haven't claimed to be a climatologists, but that makes it even more puzzling. You talk about science and facts and yet you know no more then a eight grader doing a report and using Google as his source.

I threw you a big fat softball and you swung and missed. I know I know.. You'll do a quick online search to back up your facts. But do yourself a favor.. use a different search engine.

Enjoy your evening. Hope your team wins.
Click to expand...
He sure claimed to be a Maskologist. Dad is the nicer of the four and he will engage a debate and answer a few questions from time to time. Where's Husker?
 
From the Donald:
"We just sent $520,000,000 to Ukraine to “make their energy cleaner.”

"The Biden Administration wants to now make our Army Tanks all Electric so that, despite the fact that they will not be able to go very far, fewer pollutants will be released into the air."
 
espola said:
"Gases from Mauna Loa’s crater, which is 4 miles (6 kilometers) away from the observatory, can temporarily raise the amount of CO2 in the air. Prevailing winds generally prevent volcanic gases from reaching the observatory, but when the wind is light, it can happen. However, the influx of volcanic CO2 is immediately noticeable because the readings jump upward sharply, and by amounts far larger than normal seasonal fluctuations. These brief spikes are not included in the final data because they’re caused by short-term, local variations, and they don’t reflect the long-term average that the observatory strives to measure."

climate.nasa.gov

How Do We Know Mauna Loa Carbon Dioxide Measurements Don't Include Volcanic Gases? - NASA Science

In Brief: The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, and all around the world. NASA also measures CO2 from space. Data from around the planet all shows the same upward trend. The longest record of direct measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth’s...
climate.nasa.gov climate.nasa.gov
Click to expand...
Cool.

Mostly I was messing with him. That’s why I chose a useless response about active volcanos instead of actually answering his question.

He’s a lightweight pretending to know more than he does. People who actually have a scientific background don’t waste their time saying “Ha! You don’t even know what XXXXXXX is.”. They just define their term so they can talk about the science, because that’s what they find interesting.
 
dad4 said:
Cool.

Mostly I was messing with him. That’s why I chose a useless response about active volcanos instead of actually answering his question.

He’s a lightweight pretending to know more than he does. People who actually have a scientific background don’t waste their time saying “Ha! You don’t even know what XXXXXXX is.”. They just define their term so they can talk about the science, because that’s what they find interesting.
Click to expand...
You won’t get much if that in here. Maybe from E he seems to actually do some research beyond a quick Google. I’m the first to admit these numbers and studies are beyond my pay grade. I’ll just side with the experts, the 97% so to speak.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
You won’t get much if that in here. Maybe from E he seems to actually do some research beyond a quick Google. I’m the first to admit these numbers and studies are beyond my pay grade. I’ll just side with the experts, the 97% so to speak.
Click to expand...
And they all get paid to play. It's great to see you and Dad together. Now let's get Expola out here today so were all engaged. It's time to save America. I'll go let crush know your here. I'm so happy today. TGIFF. Cheers to you and thanks for coming out today.
 
dad4 said:
Cool.

Mostly I was messing with him. That’s why I chose a useless response about active volcanos instead of actually answering his question.

He’s a lightweight pretending to know more than he does. People who actually have a scientific background don’t waste their time saying “Ha! You don’t even know what XXXXXXX is.”. They just define their term so they can talk about the science, because that’s what they find interesting.
Click to expand...
Discussions like that have already been worked over one or more times in the past so it is usually easy to respond to them (again ).
 
@espola @Hüsker Dü and @dad4

Crush Nation is so proud of you three for coming out today. Climate and the weather are changing you guys. Anyway, I have to go back to Truth Social. Things are heating up. @Ellejustus, hey bro, thanks for all you do. I admire your convictions to end PAY-FOR-PLAY youth soccer. So expensive.
 
dad4 said:
If the volcano is releasing too much CO2, then the answer is no. That volcano is active. You and your equipment will stop functioning when it erupts. Next life, choose a more geologically stable site for your observatory.

What’s with the stupid gotcha questions? If you actually have a brain, engage it. You’re acting like a kid on a school bus who wants to prove he’s smart.

I have given you an argument: Glacial cycles take far more than 200 years to do anything. Therefore, the last 200 years of warming is not a normal glacial cycle.

Agree with it, or come up with a counterargument.
Click to expand...
Seems like you and Richard don't agree. Or it seems like you don't agree with the Dicks experts.

You provided a graph that you don't even understand. Oh, you can copy and paste all you want but fact that you posted THAT graph and neither you nor Richard know what LGM is just proves my point.

You have been.provided with many counter arguments and all you do is say deny them.. as if you're an expert. That's a very scientific approach. Kinda like your spearman theory..
 
espola said:
"Gases from Mauna Loa’s crater, which is 4 miles (6 kilometers) away from the observatory, can temporarily raise the amount of CO2 in the air. Prevailing winds generally prevent volcanic gases from reaching the observatory, but when the wind is light, it can happen. However, the influx of volcanic CO2 is immediately noticeable because the readings jump upward sharply, and by amounts far larger than normal seasonal fluctuations. These brief spikes are not included in the final data because they’re caused by short-term, local variations, and they don’t reflect the long-term average that the observatory strives to measure."

climate.nasa.gov

How Do We Know Mauna Loa Carbon Dioxide Measurements Don't Include Volcanic Gases? - NASA Science

In Brief: The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, and all around the world. NASA also measures CO2 from space. Data from around the planet all shows the same upward trend. The longest record of direct measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth’s...
climate.nasa.gov climate.nasa.gov
Click to expand...
Hi Richard... you know I can still see you're reading my post. Just because you have me on igmore don't think that you viewing my post as a guest hides you. I'm flattered that you would go to such lengths to read my post. I'm truly honored...
 
dad4 said:
He’s a lightweight pretending to know more than he does. People who actually have a scientific background don’t waste their time saying “Ha! You don’t even know what XXXXXXX is.”. They just define their term so they can talk about the science, because that’s what they find interesting.
Click to expand...

Added --

He acts like the bully in the 6th Grade schoolyard taunting the smart kids.
 
dad4 said:
Cool.

Mostly I was messing with him. That’s why I chose a useless response about active volcanos instead of actually answering his question.

He’s a lightweight pretending to know more than he does. People who actually have a scientific background don’t waste their time saying “Ha! You don’t even know what XXXXXXX is.”. They just define their term so they can talk about the science, because that’s what they find interesting.
Click to expand...




dad4 said:
Cool.

Mostly I was messing with him. That’s why I chose a useless response about active volcanos instead of actually answering his question.

He’s a lightweight pretending to know more than he does. People who actually have a scientific background don’t waste their time saying “Ha! You don’t even know what XXXXXXX is.”. They just define their term so they can talk about the science, because that’s what they find interesting.
Click to expand...
Mostly..

I'll do you and Richard one better.

People with a scientific background don’t waste their time posting over 4k and 15k messages on a forum about soccer.

You're easier to trip up then the Meat Beater or Ratboy because you just back yourself into it. And try to be more original if you're going to try to dis' me. Using the school bus after I already used an eighth grader to punk you is very unoriginal and in fact was very disappointing.

And here I thought you were the more intelligent of the three. My mistake... won't happen again.
 
Multi Sport said:
Mostly..

I'll do you and Richard one better.

People with a scientific background don’t waste their time posting over 4k and 15k messages on a forum about soccer.

You're easier to trip up then the Meat Beater or Ratboy because you just back yourself into it. And try to be more original if you're going to try to dis' me. Using the school bus after I already used an eighth grader to punk you is very unoriginal and in fact was very disappointing.

And here I thought you were the more intelligent of the three. My mistake... won't happen again.
Click to expand...
Meh. Time to kill.

Did you actually have a coherent thought about glacial maxima?

If not, keep going with the school bus debate tactics. It's kind of amusing to see an adult at that level.
 
dad4 said:
Meh. Time to kill.

Did you actually have a coherent thought about glacial maxima?

If not, keep going with the school bus debate tactics. It's kind of amusing to see an adult at that level.
Click to expand...
Yes. Of course. You don’t understand something so you try to, cough, inject witty sarcasm.

I get it, you're embarrassed for not knowing. Did you try using a different search engine yet? Maybe just try doing mutiple searches with different SEs and do a basic stare and compare? I know.. it's more effort then it's worth since you're just "killing time".

Hmm..maybe that explains your sloppiness?
 
Multi Sport said:
Yes. Of course. You don’t understand something so you try to, cough, inject witty sarcasm.

I get it, you're embarrassed for not knowing. Did you try using a different search engine yet? Maybe just try doing mutiple searches with different SEs and do a basic stare and compare? I know.. it's more effort then it's worth since you're just "killing time".

Hmm..maybe that explains your sloppiness?
Click to expand...
That would be a no. You don't have a coherent thought on glacial maxima. Nor do you seem to realize that I was referring to the GM from your favorite acronym.

Basic argument is there if you ever want to address it. Past warming cycles exist, but are far too slow to offer even a partial cause for the current warming trend.
 
dad4 said:
That would be a no. You don't have a coherent thought on glacial maxima. Nor do you seem to realize that I was referring to the GM from your favorite acronym.

Basic argument is there if you ever want to address it. Past warming cycles exist, but are far too slow to offer even a partial cause for the current warming trend.
Click to expand...
So.. did you change your search engine?

Did you figure out what's wrong with the graph you posted? Or are you just killing more time?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top