Climate and Weather

Twice as many Senators? Wrong.
All states have two Senators per the Constitution
California has 53 Representatives in Congress per the Constitution and population of the State
Wyoming & North Dakota each have 1 Representative in Congress.

But you know all that....
If you weren't so lame, you wouldn't disagree with my statement that the Dakotas, with their 1.5m people, have twice as many senators as CA, with its 39m people.
 
I'm not narcissistic at all.
I'm actually quite humble.
But as your teacher, sometimes
I have to give you the benefit of
my wisdom, experience...and success.


tenor.gif
 
Pretty much. Nor Wyoming.
So for example, dummy, those three states have 2m people or so and 6 senators. California has close to 40m and 2 senators.
So when you want to learn about the real America and what most people think, y’all should listen to me.
Got it, chump? Nobody lives there.
Real America huh? How many real American states are sanctuary states again?
 
Sounds like they needed someone " a lot older.... but a lot younger in so many ways. "The U.S. hit a milestone this year (2018), producing more crude oil than any other country, and North Dakota is a big reason for that. After a lull when prices collapsed in 2014, the state is setting new production records and is the country's number two oil state, behind only Texas.

Fries U!! What a deal!!
Shhhhh! Let Wez keep investing here in So Cal where he NEVER loses money in real estate. Meanwhile, I'll look at these lesser states to find me some cheap land, on a lake, near the mountains.
 
If you weren't so lame, you wouldn't disagree with my statement that the Dakotas, with their 1.5m people, have twice as many senators as CA, with its 39m people.
Go back to spelling & punctuation.
North Dakota 2
South Dakota 2
Two separate states.
 
Last edited:
I'm not narcissistic at all. I'm actually quite humble. But as your teacher, sometimes I have to give you the benefit of my wisdom, experience...and success.
If you're not narcissistic, you're delusional.
If what you preach is wisdom, you don't want to share it...
 
North Dakota has 2, and South Dakota has 2. 2+2=4, twice as much as California has.

You can now join Izzy at the 3rd-grade remedial math seminar.
Playing GOTCHA Magoo? What else is new.
Do they share legislatures?
Two different states....just a clever bit of thinking to prove a meaningless statement.
The original post referenced North Dakota, some dick wad couldn't disagree with the reference, so they got "clever"....
 
Playing GOTCHA Magoo? What else is new.
Do they share legislatures?
Two different states....just a clever bit of thinking to prove a meaningless statement.
The original post referenced North Dakota, some dick wad couldn't disagree with the reference, so they got "clever"....

I figured it out right away. You had to be led by the nose.
 
You totally get it, dude. The place with no people houses Walmart distribution centers (for minimum wage jobs) and oil drilling with those dirty and dangerous jobs.
It's places like North Dakota that make America great, even when nobody lives there! No wonder the Dakotas with their 1.5m people have twice as many senators as CA.
Well done, Iz; I knew I could count on you for this.
Damn Russians split what should have been one state of Dakota.
 
Damn Russians split what should have been one state of Dakota.

At the time of those states' formation, the sizes of new states was limited to what was seen at the time of weaker transportation and communication as what could be handled by one state government. Look at the similar dimensions of ND, SD, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Washington. Texas was bigger because it came in as a preexisting entity (although chopped off at the Missouri Compromise slavery limit of 36° 30') and California because of its wealth. The newest states of Alaska and Hawaii really stretch out, but modern technology makes that doable.
 
Shhhhh! Let Wez keep investing here in So Cal where he NEVER loses money in real estate. Meanwhile, I'll look at these lesser states to find me some cheap land, on a lake, near the mountains.
NEVER. Maybe in Temecula or Lancaster you can lose...
Yup, you can find good, cheap land in the rockies still, for sure.
 
Back
Top