Climate and Weather

I dont know of anyone who disagrees with this. We measure c02 in parts per million, and methane in parts per billion.
If, in fact, c02 is the climate temp control mechanism, I could understand espola's hysterical claim that a large portion of the earth's population will be wiped out by its increase.
I tend to believe c02 is a bit player, like one of the pumpkins off the stage in the school halloween play, and the net effect is negligible, if measurable at all.

The atmosphere doesn't care what you believe.
 
14774205458970.jpg
If man-made global warming produced by rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels poses a significant problem, then most economists think that a revenue-neutral carbon tax imposed at the minehead and the well-head is the cheapest and most efficient solution. So too should most environmental activists who are concerned about climate change. However, many environmentalist groups are surprisingly opposed to just such a proposal in Washington State.


http://reason.com/blog/2016/10/26/greens-against-a-carbon-tax-in-washingto
 
14774205458970.jpg
If man-made global warming produced by rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels poses a significant problem, then most economists think that a revenue-neutral carbon tax imposed at the minehead and the well-head is the cheapest and most efficient solution. So too should most environmental activists who are concerned about climate change. However, many environmentalist groups are surprisingly opposed to just such a proposal in Washington State.


http://reason.com/blog/2016/10/26/greens-against-a-carbon-tax-in-washingto
I would have never guessed, a money grab by the green lib brigade. Thanks
 
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what is not true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” – Soren Kierkegaard
 
Back
Top