Climate and Weather

Hüsker Dü said:
"anthropogenic co2"? Is that what you have been told to say? Yes, "concerned" is a gentler way of saying scared, does it make you feel better? . . . and does taking comments like E's way overboard help you right your ship?
Click to expand...

You don't know what it means or you would have responded differently......

How's it feel to be the " Monkey Butt " of 2017....!

Anthropogenic CO2 Sources.
Anthropogenic CO2 sources include fossil fuel
burning and the use of limestone to make cement. ...
Misconception: Carbon dioxide comes only from
anthropogenic sources, especially from the burning of fossil fuels.

anthropogenic. (ān'thrə-pə-jěn'ĭk) Caused or influenced by humans.
Anthropogenic carbon dioxide is that portion of carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere that is produced directly by human activities, such
as the burning of fossil fuels, rather than by such processes as
respiration and decay.


Yes....You deserve another picture !!!!
 
Multi Sport said:
Good to know how you deduce information.
Click to expand...

This meme's for you Science boy...

15697811_1331053803613832_9104777733295136923_n.jpg
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Clean Coal Is Surging
Click to expand...

You're gettin played chump...

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a4947/4339171/

The Myth of Clean Coal: Analysis
Will coal become the clean, green fuel of the future? Not so fast.

The focus on mythical clean coal is particularly frustrating because practical, cost-effective alternatives do exist--and I don't mean just wind and solar power. Natural gas is plentiful in the U.S., and gas-fired power plants produce only about half as much CO2 as coal. Not only that, but once it's ready, the CCS technology envisioned for coal plants would be even more effective if used with natural gas.
 
Wez said:
You're gettin played chump...

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a4947/4339171/

The Myth of Clean Coal: Analysis
Will coal become the clean, green fuel of the future? Not so fast.

The focus on mythical clean coal is particularly frustrating because practical, cost-effective alternatives do exist--and I don't mean just wind and solar power. Natural gas is plentiful in the U.S., and gas-fired power plants produce only about half as much CO2 as coal. Not only that, but once it's ready, the CCS technology envisioned for coal plants would be even more effective if used with natural gas.
Click to expand...
OBVI
 
Wez said:
It's only Science if it's actually Science you idiot.
Click to expand...
I forgot... only liberals, progressives and Democrats believe in Science. Well, just as long as it doesn't conflict with your agenda. Then it can't be Science. You go ahead and run with that but don't forget to pull your head out of that hole you have it buried in before you start running...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top