Wez
DA
Or repeat them years later.
People are comfortable with a known falsehood as long as it supports their worldview.
Or repeat them years later.
Humans?
![]()
What do you mean you "could"?I could say North Atlantic Oscillation, but that just begs the question to "what drives the NAO?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_oscillation
What do you mean you "could"?
You just said North Atlantic Oscillation....
yes,97% comes to mind.People are comfortable with a known falsehood as long as it supports their worldview.
yes,97% comes to mind.
If they post facts, not if they are posting made up data to promote their/your agenda.It is nice when our scientific community can confirm each other's findings and experiments and post peer reviewed research on a topic, agreed.
If they post facts, not if they are posting made up data to promote their/your agenda.
Who is posting made up data to promote an agenda?
You mean beside Bernie?
When you say "Bernie" like that, please be more specific whether you are referring to the plumber or the politician.
I guess I could call our resident curmudgeon by a fuzzy derogatory name like he does everyone else...
THE 97% AKA lefty scientists AKA lying mother fuckers.Who is posting made up data to promote an agenda?
THE 97% AKA lefty scientists AKA lying mother fuckers.
THE 97% AKA lefty scientists AKA lying mother fuckers.
I see you are wising up. Finally, all my tutelage is paying off for you.That's what I thought you meant.
Please continue.
Yes, but who has a problem with my credibility?Can you be specific in what lies you are referring to? Posting sources always helps with credibility too.
Yes, but who has a problem with my credibility?
www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/.../97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wron...
Who is posting made up data to promote an agenda?
Since every anti-science AGW post here has been debunked so far, I was hoping for a better effort.
Show us a post that exposed the Truth about Global Warming/Climate Change that was later proven to be a Lie.