Primetime
SILVER ELITE
Totally disagree. The "no-punt" rule means that no team ever has to defend against a long ball. Very few players at the youngest ages - especially girls - can throw the ball more than about 15 yards in the air. So coaches just push their players up to the restriction line, have them track the keeper left and right, and then swarm the first player to get the ball. I would say that most goals I've seen under the new rule come as a result of a team's inability to get the ball out of the back when swarmed.
When keepers could punt, it forced the opposition to hold players in the back and midfield. Teams who worked on building out had a fair chance of doing it because opponents were more equally distributed over the entire field.
Who has benefits from the restriction line? Coaches who have fast, aggressive player who will swarm.
Who is punished? Coaches who have always trained kids to build-out, because their inability to punt means that they can no longer keep the opposition honest.
The part your missing is its not about winning or losing games at 9 years old. Because teams are forced to play out of the back it makes kids learn that option as part of their development. If they were allowed to just continue punting that would forever be their only and or main option. You can already see the difference when after league was over and they were allowed to punt again. Keepers give a few punts to start, gets everyone honest and spread out then can start to mix it up with playing out of the backfield. Which at the end of the day is the better option at any level. Thats the real intent of the rule. Not for the games today but for the games tomorrow. Sorry, It's not even a close argument.