An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

Just as clear as your case for collusion.
Attacking teenagers as "soulless" after their school was shot up and their friends murdered. What is with you people? Why are you so afraid of everything and everybody?
 
It seems clear that when the righties and nutters like Ted Nugent start attacking teenage survivors of a mass murder in their school, the kids are onto something. The make America stupid crowd is scared. Who would attack kids like this?
Their on to mass murder, not gun control. Neither of you, as always, seem to be able to distinguish between the two issues
 
Their on to mass murder, not gun control. Neither of you, as always, seem to be able to distinguish between the two issues
I can never understand you and you don’t listen, so I don’t respond to you anymore. This is an exception. Your response here, for example, has nothing to do with my point about attacking the teens. Your response to my inquiry to Joe about whether you’re a “union boy” which he always denigrates Husker with was also a non-sequitur.
 
I can never understand you and you don’t listen, so I don’t respond to you anymore. This is an exception. Your response here, for example, has nothing to do with my point about attacking the teens. Your response to my inquiry to Joe about whether you’re a “union boy” which he always denigrates Husker with was also a non-sequitur.

Izzy is the king of non-sequiturs.
 
I can never understand you and you don’t listen, so I don’t respond to you anymore. This is an exception. Your response here, for example, has nothing to do with my point about attacking the teens.
You said "the kids are onto something."

It seems clear that when the righties and nutters like Ted Nugent start attacking teenage survivors of a mass murder in their school, the kids are onto something. The make America stupid crowd is scared. Who would attack kids like this?
I just told you what they are "onto". It would help if you people took heed of what you post. You cry non-sequitur because it renders your argument inert.
 
No, just trying to figure out the democrats strategy for the upcoming elections and hoping they are as dump as they seem.

Oh right... trying to figure out the democrats strategy. My read on the coming wave is that it has less to do with Democrats strategy so much as Republican's have been sucking at running the country so badly that the election is going to be about them and their track-record.
 
I only bothered to cut and paste the first part, but here's the best line in the whole article...

"Without Hillary Clinton to demonize, Trump now faces one opponent he can’t beat: Himself."

GOP fears anti-Trump wave
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/381201-juan-williams-gop-fears-anti-trump-wave

So far, 24 Republicans have announced their retirements from Congress this cycle. This number is the highest of any congressional cycle since 1973.

What was happening in 1973?

The Watergate scandal. It exposed the lies and cover-ups of Republican President Richard Nixon and forced his resignation.

In the 1974 midterm elections, 49 Democrats took House seats away from the Republicans, giving them more than a 2-1 majority in the lower chamber. Democrats also gained four Senate seats, bringing them up to a total of 60 seats.

Democrats are praying for history to repeat itself with President Trump in the Nixon role.


Incredibly, Republicans seem to agree that 2018 will be a lot like 1974.

In addition to all the other retirements by House Republicans, there is now talk of Speaker Paul Ryan (Wis.) possibly quitting, too.

Ryan’s spokesman has denied he is considering resigning. But Nevada Congressman Mark Amodei, a very vulnerable Republican in the coming midterms, is on the record telling reporters that is what he is hearing from party colleagues.

Talk of Ryan’s departure is significant because lesser-known House Republicans have no reason to think they will survive if Ryan isn’t inclined to try to hold on.

Take a moderate Republican congressman like Pennsylvania’s Ryan Costello. He told MSNBC he is not running for reelection because Trump is making it impossible for House Republicans to do their jobs.

“It’s very difficult for me to get [any] message out because we’re talking about Stormy Daniels, or it was [fired FBI deputy director Andrew] McCabe, before that it was [fired secretary of State] Rex Tillerson and where he heard the news that he was fired, and just one thing after another,” Costello, a two-term Congressman, complained.

And that’s not the only sign of dread among Republicans.
 
Last edited:
Oh right... trying to figure out the democrats strategy. My read on the coming wave is that it has less to do with Democrats strategy so much as Republican's have been sucking at running the country so badly that the election is going to be about them and their track-record.
I am not a big fan of Trump, but here you go,
Donald+Trump+Trump+Visits+Union+Training+Apprenticeship+nVrxvbKUSn8l.jpg

SPRING SHOCK: TRUMP HITS 50% APPROVAL
 
Back
Top