An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

You probably know way better than I why that is unfeasible in many ways. Do people pulled away from their livelyhoods receive full compensation for their efforts? Will we simply surround every school with National Guardsmen or just deploy a limited number? Who gives them their directions and who will give the order to use force, deadly or otherwise? Will these National Guardsmen also intervene in other school disturbances such as fights, practical jokes from rival schools or student protests?

Kent State.
 
Seems not to be a good idea, it is an idea, it just seems disruptive (to too many in too many ways), without congruity and with so many variables . . . amount of training, how recent that training was, threat recognition, etc.
Seems ripe for another, They didn't enter the building until it was too late" scenario. I'm not sure the National Guard is filled with ready, willing, able and discretionary enough individuals? We always had what we referred to as "Narc's" that patrolled the high school I attended, they were "Teacher's Aides", college students who always tried to keep me from leaving school to go surf, but even though unarmed, manned with cell phones at least they could sound the alarm. Not a great idea either, but again, an idea.
The National Guardsman take an oath to serve and to protect against all enemies foreign and domestic. They are also less disruptive then a shooter. The funding for their training and commitments are already in place. Have you ever served?
 
The National Guardsman take an oath to serve and to protect against all enemies foreign and domestic. They are also less disruptive then a shooter. The funding for their training and commitments are already in place. Have you ever served?
How many times will you ask me that question but not the plumber, nono, Lion or lil joe (the bots way in) or even The Donald and family?
 
The National Guardsman take an oath to serve and to protect against all enemies foreign and domestic. They are also less disruptive then a shooter. The funding for their training and commitments are already in place. Have you ever served?
The National Guard does seem like a good option for those in need of continued structure in their lives, a way to pay for an education and to continue playing soldier.
 
The National Guard does seem like a good option for those in need of continued structure in their lives, a way to pay for an education and to continue playing soldier.
Seems like a good way to fullfill their solemn oath to protect our school children from enemies foreign and domestic. Have you ever served in the military?
 
I have. But I am always confused by your subsequent post that seem to suggest that you have some experience based knowledge about military service and structure.
I live in a military town surrounded by military personnel, my pops drove a tank, I have family military memorabilia going back to the Civil War, I know several Vietnam vets who are basically family. It's fairly easy to get a grasp of a pretty basic situation.
 
I live in a military town surrounded by military personnel, my pops drove a tank, I have family military memorabilia going back to the Civil War, I know several Vietnam vets who are basically family. It's fairly easy to get a grasp of a pretty basic situation.
What side were they on?
 
In the 2016 election, the NRA spent $11,438,118 to support Donald Trump’s campaign and donated $19,756,346 to groups opposing Hillary Clinton’s. However, the bulk of the contributions have gone to House and Senate members. Here is a look at the top 10 recipients of NRA contributions.

http://myconnection.cox.com/article/trending/1b1639ce-1cd4-11e8-9713-5580a036bb74/
What are you trying to say?
Trump the Gun Grabber: Cedes Dems’ Wish List— Bump Stocks, Buying Age, ‘Assault Weapons,’ Background Checks…

…Tells Scalise to Take a Hike — After Surviving Assassination Attempt
 
Back
Top