*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
Awww yes... You're all for killing the unborn which then doesn't allow the baby to grow into a school age kid, thus protecting them from a crazy fk with a gun... makes perfect sense.
An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America
- Thread starter Wez
- Start date
Awww yes... You're all for killing the unborn which then doesn't allow the baby to grow into a school age kid, thus protecting them from a crazy fk with a gun... makes perfect sense.
I am? I didn't know that.
Didn't read the article?
It's a small Christian school with a "unisex, one-toilet bathroom".
Wez
DA
Only a hypocritical asshole would bring abortion into a discussion of how to protect our schools.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Wez
DA
Right on que
Sheriff Joe
DA
Wez
DA
Russia approves of this comment.
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
You pro-life? I didn't know that.? Willing to go on record?
I have stated here many times before that I would never recommend an abortion for a woman unless there was a serious medical condition, or the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest, but I would never stand in her way if that is what she wanted.
Borrowed:
it seems that any mention of removing a particular style of weapon from commercial sales is interpreted as a violation of the 2nd Amendment which only states that we can own a weapon not define the type of weapon we can own. Modifying these military style weapons for commercial sales in such a way as to limit their round capacity to 3 - 5 shells vice allowing 30 round clips to be mounted would seem workable.
War has been instrumental to the introduction of era weapons into our hunting community since WWI. Why shouldn't these current military style weapons be any different? Would we as gun owners be willing to surrender our high capacity clips? I know I would.
As a hunter, who owns a military style weapon, a veteran and NRA Life member, I favor a single shot rifle for that activity because it actually takes some skill to harvest animals I put in the freezer.
Why do we have to continually link solutions to these issues as an effort to totally remove our rights to keep and bear arms?
When do we, as gun owners, step up and help guide the NRA and others to do more to saving our children, grandchildren and families?
it seems that any mention of removing a particular style of weapon from commercial sales is interpreted as a violation of the 2nd Amendment which only states that we can own a weapon not define the type of weapon we can own. Modifying these military style weapons for commercial sales in such a way as to limit their round capacity to 3 - 5 shells vice allowing 30 round clips to be mounted would seem workable.
War has been instrumental to the introduction of era weapons into our hunting community since WWI. Why shouldn't these current military style weapons be any different? Would we as gun owners be willing to surrender our high capacity clips? I know I would.
As a hunter, who owns a military style weapon, a veteran and NRA Life member, I favor a single shot rifle for that activity because it actually takes some skill to harvest animals I put in the freezer.
Why do we have to continually link solutions to these issues as an effort to totally remove our rights to keep and bear arms?
When do we, as gun owners, step up and help guide the NRA and others to do more to saving our children, grandchildren and families?
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
Recommend killing a baby? I would certainly hope not. But of course you do a wonderful job of talking out both sides of your ass. Well done.
Wez
DA
Was that supposed to make sense? Keep your abortion bullshit out of the discussions of guns idiot.
When Lawn Darts hit the market, the Consumer Product Safety Commission attempted to ban them after a 4-year-old girl was killed when she ran into the path of a game being played by her brothers. However, after a lawsuit by the manufacturer and interference from Congress, CPSC retrenched to a position that it not be marketed as a toy. Several years later, after thousands of children had been injured by the non-toys, CPSC found their balls again and banned them outright.
What could go wrong?
So based on YOUR premise, anything that could " Harm " someone should be banned....
Why then are KITCHEN utensils not BANNED ?
Answer that one..... MR SPOLA !
I'll tell you why.....PARENTING !
I guarantee YOUR parents taught you respect for weapons, growing up in the northeast as you
have professed so many times on this forum you hunted and brought the ( Tools ) guns to school
and put them in the boot/coat closet. After school you went home with it and the rabbits you
got. No one complained, no one was shot and food was brought home.
Parenting !
What we have now is the " Pussification " of society.....
Just as the " Media " are using/letting the students dictate
the narrative on this issue of " Guns ". Had Broward County
school district done their job as school administrators and run
the schools properly this instance quite possibly would NOT have
happened. But since the " Trevon Martin " incident they have
hidden, reduced and swept away any chance at turning the tide
in a way where the SCHOOLS have control. To patronize certain
groups they allowed this boil to fester and now we are once again
reacting instead of being proactive.
*GOBEARGO*
PREMIER
Show me.