An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

Thank you for making the case for more action.

https://www.npr.org/2017/10/05/555580598/fact-check-is-chicago-proof-that-gun-laws-don-t-work

FACT CHECK: Is Chicago Proof That Gun Laws Don't Work?
The only time you care about the black community is during an election, who are youkidding.
Just ask your liberal hero, M Sanger.
12) “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” Sanger wrote. —Letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble on Dec., 10, 1939
 
12) “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” Sanger wrote. —Letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble on Dec., 10, 1939

Will you be spreading any other lies?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

"From 1939 to 1942 Sanger was an honorary delegate of the Birth Control Federation of America, which included a supervisory role—alongside Mary Lasker and Clarence Gamble—in the Negro Project, an effort to deliver birth control to poor black people.[82] Sanger, over the objections of other supervisors, wanted the Negro Project to hire black ministers in leadership roles. To emphasize the benefits of hiring black community leaders to act as spokesmen, she wrote to Gamble:

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

New York University's Margaret Sanger Papers Project says that though the letter would have been meant to avoid the mistaken notion that the Negro Project was a racist campaign, conspiracy theorists have fraudulently attempted to exploit the quotation "as evidence she led a calculated effort to reduce the black population against their will".[83][84][85]"
 
Remember, They’re Wrong About Everything, Especially On Firearms

3fff040c-db93-4a8d-8509-11951f92ab5f.jpg





In June, the Washington Free Beacon’s Editor-in-Chief, Matthew Continetti had a good column about how the elite media doesn’t know what it’s talking about in the Trump era.

They’re wrong about everything,” read the headline—and that is entirely applicable when it comes to news reports about guns and gun laws. It’s bad. We have media personalities not knowing the difference between semiautomatic and automatic—and not knowing that there have been laws regulating the latter since the 1930s. Again, liberal media folks, a semiautomatic system is one that discharges one round per trigger pull from a self-reloading system (aka virtually every firearm that’s sold on the market that isn’t a revolver or a bolt-action rifle). Second, every gun dealer with a federal firearms license has to perform background checks on all purchases. Third, and this relates to the Texas shooter, being convicted of domestic abuse prohibits you from owning guns. No debate here. If you’re found guilty of this offense, you should have your gun rights stripped.

On Sunday, Devin Patrick Kelley, 26, opened fire at a Baptist church, killing 26 people and wounding an additional 20 with a rifle. He was given a bad-conduct discharge in 2014 from the U.S. Air Force. Prior to that, however, he was convicted of domestic abuse against his wife and child in 2012, and given a yearlong jail sentence. That conviction should have barred him from owning guns, but he purchased a rifle in April of 2016 from Academy Sports & Outdoors. That’s the real question here. Instead, we have liberal mocking people for offering thoughts and prayers, even though they defended “Allahu Akbar” days before, and spouting off crap that is just untrue about firearms
 
I'm glad his 2A rights weren't infringed...

http://www.newsweek.com/texas-churc...arged-animal-cruelty-after-beating-dog-703960

TEXAS CHURCH SHOOTER DEVIN KELLEY WAS CHARGED WITH ANIMAL CRUELTY AFTER BEATING A DOG WITH HIS FISTS

"Kelley also has a history of spousal and child abuse, which is why he was discharged from the Air Force. He pleaded guilty to intentionally fracturing a toddler’s skull."
Those who advocate “gun control” are reluctant to admit what they are really pushing: gun monopolization by the state.
 
Those who advocate “gun control” are reluctant to admit what they are really pushing: gun monopolization by the state.
That's really funny. All you have to look at is the ratio of guns to people between us and the rest of the world, look at our relative amount of gun deaths compared to the rest of the world, and come to a conclusion.
It's to fight the government tyranny.
Do any of you people look around and use common sense at all?
 
That's really funny. All you have to look at is the ratio of guns to people between us and the rest of the world, look at our relative amount of gun deaths compared to the rest of the world, and come to a conclusion.
It's to fight the government tyranny.
Do any of you people look around and use common sense at all?


More Guns will solve the problem...
And Lasers, Knives, Chainsaws, Crossbows, Cars, Trucks, Buses, Pencils, Chemicals, Lighters, Airplanes, Rocks.....
Oh those pesky Rocks and the Fake Palestinians who throw them....
It will have You Democrats on edge forever !
 
Wiki is the greatest fact checker, which is why only righties hate it. It shows reality and destroys the lies they like to tell themselves, like you just did with Sanger.

Wait a Minute, you just invalidated the Spola Snopes source......Shame on you..Bailiff wack his Pee Pee..

No No No .....I forgot Wez likes that..Stop Oh for Goodness sake Stop !
 
That's really funny. All you have to look at is the ratio of guns to people between us and the rest of the world, look at our relative amount of gun deaths compared to the rest of the world, and come to a conclusion.
It's to fight the government tyranny.
Do any of you people look around and use common sense at all?
Common sense or science? Pick one.
 
It will be interesting to see which way this goes. Unless Republican voters start putting pressure on the leaders then plainly there isn't enough pressure to change our nations gun laws. Even though no one is saying it, you'd have to figure nut jobs shooting up country-western concerts and churches are the type of event that could very well act the catalyst that lights this fire under the life crowd- and turns them against republican's on the gun issue.

I can only imagine the republicans announcing the plan to protect society is to now start telling church goers to bring their revolvers to service and insisting priests install gun safe's behind the alter?
 
Back
Top