An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

xav10 said:
I'm saying only that the military will defeat the armed citizenry. When Trump was elected, i said to my wife "this guy is so disrespectful of congress and the judiciary, that it may come down to which side the military takes." the "armed citizenry" would be worthless against our military. Fortunately, the military has spoken on a few occasions through its leaders; making clear that it is on America's side and not Trump's.
Click to expand...
That's what the King of England said.
 
Buddhabman said:
It appears this is a police procedure mistake. But likely because police campus officers don't expect effin kids to be packing on a college campus. Why the fuck would they or should they. They don't even expect of kids at USC in the middle of the hood. Of course they do take the neighborhood kids more seriously. Guns + College Campus = Ludicrous
Click to expand...

What could go wrong with drunk frat boys all gunned up on campus...
 
Buddhabman said:
It appears this is a police procedure mistake. But likely because police campus officers don't expect effin kids to be packing on a college campus. Why the fuck would they or should they. They don't even expect of kids at USC in the middle of the hood. Of course they do take the neighborhood kids more seriously. Guns + College Campus = Ludicrous
Click to expand...


Listen....Everyone quiet now !

Hear that ?

It's a Poster tapping away an excuse for his retarded commentary.

Oh.....and it's procedure for police to inspect/search someone they've
detained/taken into custody AND TRANSPORTED TO THE STATION.

Go ahead......there's lot's of room on the Internet for Liberal excuses.
The Queen of them ( HRC ) is conjuring up a few more to divert attention today.


Bubba - Logic = Nonsensical
 
Lion Eyes said:
Really?
See Charles, Lord Cornwallis
Click to expand...

He is one of those people who came over on a sailing ship. Years later, he surrendered at Yorktown because the French were sinking or driving away the ships carrying his supplies and reinforcements. Is that the point you wanted to make?
 
espola said:
He is one of those people who came over on a sailing ship. Years later, he surrendered at Yorktown because the French were sinking or driving away the ships carrying his supplies and reinforcements. Is that the point you wanted to make?
Click to expand...
Yes, but he wasn't "picked off by the French" was he?
The French didn't allow British ships to arrive when needed for the evacuation of 8000 British troops...
Washington and Rochambeau cut off supply lines and Cornwallis had to surrender....
 
espola said:
Perhaps you should review the thread.
Click to expand...
The English almost won the war, if not for the armed colony civilians, they would have long before the French helped us out.

Thank God for Benjamin Franklin, the help of France & the arrogance of Cornwallis....
 
Nobody seriously makes an argument that guns keep us free from tyranny. Those that do should powder their wigs and clean their muskets and not pretend to debate current affairs. They are too stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top