An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

Ricky Fandango said:
I'm not going to do anything.
My job is to protect the health of the nation by installing top notch plumbing systems.
I protect my own home.
If someone tries to kill me or my family, they might wake up dead.
If you feel it was a terrorist threat, do what you think you need to do.
I'm sure any threat to an elected official is monitored.





Madaonna said she thought alot about blowing up the White House.
What happened there?
Click to expand...
Coward.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I'm asking the question to promote thought, in this case
deeper than simply passing another law.
More laws won't change what is wrong with many folks
in our country.
The fact that you don't get it is a surprise to no one.
Click to expand...

The " Rodent " is incapable of serious deep thought, that would
be contrary to the Lemming order he abides by....

Regurgitation is much easier on his " Frontal Lobe "..!
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Coward.
Click to expand...


Your comment is to be directed at your own mirror...

95546581-cartoon-framed-old-mirror.jpg
 
Ricky Fandango said:
You implied the law was a new one.
We dont need more laws.
Click to expand...

I implied nothing. I asked the previous poster if this is the type of law to which he was referring. As we have discovered, this law exists already in some form in some areas, but I'm not sure from LE's responses what his position about that law is,

Here is a position for you - we need just enough laws so that everyone can have what they want as long as they don't fail a numbnuts discovery procedure. Not being able to answer a simple question might mark one as a failing that process.
 
espola said:
I implied nothing. I asked the previous poster if this is the type of law to which he was referring. As we have discovered, this law exists already, but I'm not sure from LE's responses what his position is.

Here is a position for you - we need just enough laws so that everyone can have what they want as long as they don't fail a numbnuts discovery procedure. Not being able to answer a simple question might mark one as a failing that process.
Click to expand...
"Like this one" -when asked about new laws.
-espola-
 
espola said:
I implied nothing. I asked the previous poster if this is the type of law to which he was referring. As we have discovered, this law exists already in some form in some areas, but I'm not sure from LE's responses what his position about that law is,

Here is a position for you - we need just enough laws so that everyone can have what they want as long as they don't fail a numbnuts discovery procedure. Not being able to answer a simple question might mark one as a failing that process.
Click to expand...
The only new law we need is a national ID to vote law.
Other than that, we have enough laws for five or six countries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top