An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

messy said:
That cop shot in MS today make you proud? Daily slaughter is a small price to pay.
Sheee-yit, we gots us some leeburtee, don’t we?!
Click to expand...
Laws were broken and people got killed.
How are my rights an issue here?

Your glee is misappropriated.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
QED
Click to expand...

What was demonstrated?
Ricky Fandango said:
The perp is dead.
A guy with a gun killed him before he could kill more innocent people.
Some solace, though not for those who lost their children.
Click to expand...

The festival had perimeter security and armed guards. The cops put the guy down within a minute or two. He killed at least 3 and injured a dozen others regardless. Security is not the issue - keeping guns away from nutballs would be a better focus.
 
espola said:
The festival had perimeter security and armed guards. The cops put the guy down within a minute or two. He killed at least 3 and injured a dozen others regardless. Security is not the issue - keeping guns away from nutballs would be a better focus.
Click to expand...
Well said.
 
espola said:
What was demonstrated?


The festival had perimeter security and armed guards. The cops put the guy down within a minute or two. He killed at least 3 and injured a dozen others regardless. Security is not the issue - keeping guns away from nutballs would be a better focus.
Click to expand...
Good thing the cops had guns.
Too bad the perp was able to get his hands on wire cutters without a background check.
How would you propose keeping guns out of the hands of nut cakes?
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Good thing the cops had guns.
Too bad the perp was able to get his hands on wire cutters without a background check.
How would you propose keeping guns out of the hands of nut cakes?
Click to expand...

Regular training, such as in the "original intent", would allow an opportunity for screening them out.
 
AAF4yO5.img
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Mandated, subsidized, chronyism.
Click to expand...
I think espola is advocating the development of more local militias.
Maybe every neighborhood?
I dont know if I'd go that far. I just support the right of every law abiding American to arm themselves.

He seems to be at odds with messy's call to eliminate the second amendment.
 
espola said:
What was demonstrated?
That the " perimeter " security " YOU are touting failed.

The festival had perimeter security and armed guards.
The cops put the guy down within a minute or two.
He killed at least 3 and injured a dozen others regardless.
Security is not the issue - keeping guns away from nutballs
would be a better focus. *
Click to expand...



* WRONG !

Parenting is to Blame....nothing else.

You can keep your head up there, it's reducing the
lingering smell you're accustom to...
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I think espola is advocating the development of more local militias.
Maybe every neighborhood?
I dont know if I'd go that far. I just support the right of every law abiding American to arm themselves.

He seems to be at odds with messy's call to eliminate the second amendment.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't eliminate the 2nd. I wouldn't even require it. Anybody can own any weapon they choose and can afford - unless they are too young, or a criminal, or too stupid. Filtering out that last group could be handled by requiring militia training for all who wish to possess or use anything more than a single-shot muzzle-loader.

However, if you are going to defend your gun ownership on 2nd Amendment grounds, spare me your "original intent" bullshit.
 
espola said:
I wouldn't eliminate the 2nd. I wouldn't even require it. Anybody can own any weapon they choose and can afford - unless they are too young, or a criminal, or too stupid. Filtering out that last group could be handled by requiring militia training for all who wish to possess or use anything more than a single-shot muzzle-loader.

However, if you are going to defend your gun ownership on 2nd Amendment grounds, spare me your "original intent" bullshit.
Click to expand...
I dont want to defend anything on 2nd amendment grounds.
Shouldn't have to.
Its supposed to be a free country.
The second amendment is there to keep the messys of the world from stepping on our toes.

"original intent" is for lawyers to fight about.
I can read plain english.
 
QUOTE="espola, post: 278334, member: 3"

I wouldn't eliminate the 2nd. I wouldn't even require it.
Anybody can own any weapon they choose and can afford -
unless they are too young, or a criminal, or too stupid.
Filtering out that last group could be handled by
requiring militia training for all who wish to possess *
or use anything more than a single-shot muzzle-loader.

However, if you are going to defend your gun ownership on
2nd Amendment grounds, spare me your "original intent" bullshit.

/QUOTE

* Really Spola......

How'd that principal work out for the two
Military members who were killed this week
by an Afgahan Soldier who was Trained by our
Service Members....

It's the " Mind " set that he was raised with that
facilitated his actions.....

Once AGAIN ...SPOLA...

It's Parenting ....
( And a subset called Religious Culture. )
 
Thoughts and prayers this week to the families of the latest NRA board members to lose their seats needlessly.

And thanks to the first amendment for my right to free expression.
 
Nonononono said:
Thoughts and prayers this week to the families of the latest NRA board members to lose their seats needlessly.

And thanks to the first amendment for my right to free expression.
Click to expand...

A thanks to the first amendment for "My " right to free expression !

Now go suck a Lemon ya fat slob....!

kzyd6socdn8y970uiddn.jpg

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top