An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

Ricky Fandango said:
Honest question.
If you see more nuts out there going ape shit and shooting randomly into crowds of people, does that make you more inclined or less inclined to surrender your second amendment rights?
Click to expand...

Are you carrying now when you go to Walmart?
 
It’s a mental health issue.
We have a lot of crazy American terrorists and delusional people who think we have semi-automatic guns to “fight tyranny.”
 
messy said:
I feel kinda bad for him.
His guns make him feel powerful.
It happens.
Click to expand...
messy said:
It’s a mental health issue.
We have a lot of crazy American terrorists and delusional people who think we have semi-automatic guns to “fight tyranny.”
Click to expand...
messy said:
These semi-automatics really permit the mowing down of a bunch of tyrants at once.
Great stuff!
Click to expand...
messy said:
Nono the fake news keeps saying those people who got shot in Dayton and El Paso were “innocent.”
Do have have the real truth here from your sources, nutjob?
Click to expand...
messy said:
We keep being attacked by terrorists under Trump.
He’s definitely not keeping America safe.
Click to expand...

Im not the guy who posted that he doesnt feel safe.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I have no issues about feeling safe.
Dont do it unless you have a CCP.
Click to expand...

Is that hard to get?

Where I grew up in Vermont, there are no restrictions on law-abiding sane adults carrying whatever they want, concealed or not, except where a business or institution bans them. There are very few mass shootings in Vermont, at least not since the Revolutionary War.

In neighboring New Hampshire, where I lived from 18 months to 4 years depending on how you measure it, there are similar laws. There have been a couple of mass shootings on record during and since that time - one an old man who started shooting up the neighborhood from his apartment above the general store one day, and one from a disgruntled resident who targeted town officials and police because he felt he was being harassed about building code issues.

So what's the deal with the rest of the country - banana clips and video games?
 
espola said:
Is that hard to get?

Where I grew up in Vermont, there are no restrictions on law-abiding sane adults carrying whatever they want, concealed or not, except where a business or institution bans them. There are very few mass shootings in Vermont, at least not since the Revolutionary War.

In neighboring New Hampshire, where I lived from 18 months to 4 years depending on how you measure it, there are similar laws. There have been a couple of mass shootings on record during and since that time - one an old man who started shooting up the neighborhood from his apartment above the general store one day, and one from a disgruntled resident who targeted town officials and police because he felt he was being harassed about building code issues.

So what's the deal with the rest of the country - banana clips and video games?
Click to expand...
I wouldnt recommend you carry weapons into WalMart.
Kinda crazy, especially after what just happened.
You turned yours in, right?
 
Ricky Fandango said:
The Cubans who set up Oswald.
You remember.

"us"? ..how many of you are there?
Click to expand...

The question has long been "which Cubans"? Was it Cubans who were retaliating for an attempted assassination of Castro? Or Cubans seeking revenge for JFK's failure to send US military help during the Bay of Pigs invasion? How much of it was CIA, and how much if it was Mafia? Jack Ruby, the man who silenced Oswald, had a long record as an enforcer and bag man for the Texas/Louisiana Mafia, and ran a mob-protected strip club where Texas cops could get in free just by showing their badges. That's how he knew his way around Dallas police headquarters and why the Dallas PD did not question his presence there - they all knew him and thought of him as the kind of friend cops make in their duties.

In any event, it was unlikely Oswald, who was rated as Sharpshooter by the Marine Corps (midway between Marksman and Expert) could have pulled off the miracle shots with a WWI surplus rifle and mismatched scope. The most direct criticisms of the Warren Commission Report point out the improbability of that shooting feat, even without getting into the "magic bullet" reconstruction to account for all the wounds inflicted on JFK and Connally. I saw one documentary about the controversy where it was demonstrated that a shooter hidden in a storm drain not far from the assassination site would have had clear shots at the Presidential car. The "grassy knoll" story has not been proven or disproven, but it is as believable as the story that Oswald pulled it off all by himself.

Now what's that about Tower 7?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top