An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

Universal background checks to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous people-
Safe and secure storage of firearms to prevent access by children or any unauthorized person.

Both are good things...although back ground checks only works when law abiding citizens are buying or selling weapons.
Cars are stolen from locked & secure storage meant to prevent unauthorized use of the vehicle....nothing is full proof.
 
Lion Eyes said:
Universal background checks to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous people-
Safe and secure storage of firearms to prevent access by children or any unauthorized person.

Both are good things...although back ground checks only works when law abiding citizens are buying or selling weapons.
Cars are stolen from locked & secure storage meant to prevent unauthorized use of the vehicle....nothing is full proof.
Click to expand...

Or fool proof, either. You know, you pass laws, and people still commit the same old crimes. Why bother, right?
 
espola said:
Or fool proof, either. You know, you pass laws, and people still commit the same old crimes. Why bother, right?
Click to expand...
Brilliant. Fascinating bit of reasoning there Magoo.
You agree that writing new laws does nothing to stop people bent on killing others, burglarizing your home or illegally entering the country
I'm all for back ground checks, no problem.
One should always be security conscious, be it locking guns up, locking your house up or securing the borders.
None of those things insure our safety. Let's enforce existing laws. More laws will only affect the law abiding.
Can't wait for more brilliance from you...
 
Lion Eyes said:
Brilliant. Fascinating bit of reasoning there Magoo.
You agree that writing new laws does nothing to stop people bent on killing others, burglarizing your home or illegally entering the country
I'm all for back ground checks, no problem.
One should always be security conscious, be it locking guns up, locking your house up or securing the borders.
None of those things insure our safety. Let's enforce existing laws. More laws will only affect the law abiding.
Can't wait for more brilliance from you...
Click to expand...

Whoosh.
 
Lion Eyes said:
Brilliant. Fascinating bit of reasoning there Magoo.
You agree that writing new laws does nothing to stop people bent on killing others, burglarizing your home or illegally entering the country
I'm all for back ground checks, no problem.
One should always be security conscious, be it locking guns up, locking your house up or securing the borders.
None of those things insure our safety. Let's enforce existing laws. More laws will only affect the law abiding.
Can't wait for more brilliance from you...
Click to expand...
Those 2 things are only common sense, no gun owner I know would be against those 2 thoughts, but I am sure that isn't all they want to get done.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
View attachment 2491
Click to expand...

upload_2018-4-30_15-39-37.jpeg

During a meeting with Vice President Pence and senior senators . . .

  • Trump endorsed the Assault Weapons Ban.
  • Trump endorsed background checks for private sales at gun shows.
  • Trump endorsed raising the age to purchase firearms to 21.
  • Trump declared the top priority of the NRA since Trump’s election, concealed-carry reciprocity, “will never pass.” (This bill would ensure that if you have a valid concealed-carry permit in your home state, you are allowed to carry a concealed weapon in any state.)
  • Trump contended members of Congress were “petrified of the NRA” and that he was not. “They have great power over you people. They have less power over me.”
Finally, Trump contradicted his own vice president’s assurances about due process and basically contended that the government should seize firearms from people it deems dangerous and go back and get legal justification later.

“Take the firearms first, and then go to court,” Trump said. “Because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due-process procedures — I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms. They saw everything — to go to court would have taken a long time. So you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.”

This is the sort of comment that might have started armed standoffs with law enforcement had it been uttered by President Obama. Had a Democratic president proposed this — literally grabbing guns without legal cause! — the fury from the NRA would have been hotter than a thousand suns going supernova.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/trumps-sudden-love-of-gun-control-isnt-that-sudden/
 
Booter said:
View attachment 2499

During a meeting with Vice President Pence and senior senators . . .

  • Trump endorsed the Assault Weapons Ban.
  • Trump endorsed background checks for private sales at gun shows.
  • Trump endorsed raising the age to purchase firearms to 21.
  • Trump declared the top priority of the NRA since Trump’s election, concealed-carry reciprocity, “will never pass.” (This bill would ensure that if you have a valid concealed-carry permit in your home state, you are allowed to carry a concealed weapon in any state.)
  • Trump contended members of Congress were “petrified of the NRA” and that he was not. “They have great power over you people. They have less power over me.”
Finally, Trump contradicted his own vice president’s assurances about due process and basically contended that the government should seize firearms from people it deems dangerous and go back and get legal justification later.

“Take the firearms first, and then go to court,” Trump said. “Because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due-process procedures — I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms. They saw everything — to go to court would have taken a long time. So you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.”

This is the sort of comment that might have started armed standoffs with law enforcement had it been uttered by President Obama. Had a Democratic president proposed this — literally grabbing guns without legal cause! — the fury from the NRA would have been hotter than a thousand suns going supernova.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/trumps-sudden-love-of-gun-control-isnt-that-sudden/
Click to expand...
Everyone knows that Trump is a joke and not to be taken seriously.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Everyone knows that Trump is a joke and not to be taken seriously.
Click to expand...

Everyone here knows you've been black balled from the " Disneyland " project and
other job sites due to a very poor work ethic and attitude....

Lurking here will NOT fill the void in your self esteem........

Go hang out at the Standard Hotel with your " Buddy " Adam Schiff.....
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Nothing shooters like more than a "Gun-Free Zone", right?
Click to expand...

On my recent trip to Arizona, I spent a morning at the Titan Missile Museum near Tucson. Down in the Control Room, the docent told a tale of when the VP of the time came to visit the new site, and the Secret Service requested that the on-duty officers put away their sidearms. They refused and the SS relented, letting them stay armed throughout the visit.
 
espola said:
On my recent trip to Arizona, I spent a morning at the Titan Missile Museum near Tucson. Down in the Control Room, the docent told a tale of when the VP of the time came to visit the new site, and the Secret Service requested that the on-duty officers put away their sidearms. They refused and the SS relented, letting them stay armed throughout the visit.
Click to expand...
You fucking liar. No cop will refuse the secret service, you dick.
Get back to your ward.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top