Amazingcase for increasing gun ownership in America

Save me with your big gun, Lion. I know you can.

Hey " Messy " Financial ...Fried hands is having a midnight course on
stock trading....he mentioned something about " KEK-ing " all new comers
for $ 10.00 if you show up early with cash....
 
Oh, please shoot somebody with it. Please. Save me from the bad guys!
Chances are it won't b me to save your precious little ass...but there are millions of folks out there with a CWP that will...

"Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhs...uld-include-how-guns-save-lives/#2cfe0ea5edc5
 
Chances are it won't b me to save your precious little ass...but there are millions of folks out there with a CWP that will...

"Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhs...uld-include-how-guns-save-lives/#2cfe0ea5edc5
And I imagine plenty more go unreported.
 
French riot police now using semiautomatic weapons, live ammo against protesters. UPDATE: Full auto?
Jazz Shaw Jan 15, 2019 9:21 AM
YellowVest.jpg

Sire, the peasants are revolting
 
In regards to the issue of gun rights, all I can think of lately is the case of Jayme Closs. After her father was shot and killed with a bullet that came thru his front door, Jayne and her mother huddled in the locked bathroom until the nut job broke the door down, killed her mother and the poor girl was in hell for 88 days. Imagine how things might have been different if her mother had a gun.
 

More guns= more death, period.
Wrong again.
DOJ: Less than 3 Percent of Nation’s Prisoners Acquired Firearms at Retail Stores, Gun Shows
EmailTwitter

a637b3_united-nations-small-arms-46314-in-jan-19-2016-file-photo-handguns-are-displayed-640x421.jpg

AP Photo/John Locher
15 Jan 2019125

1:48
A January 2019 Department of Justice report shows fewer than three percent of prisoners who used guns in crime acquired those guns at retail stores or at a gun show.
The report, titled, “Source and Use of Firearms Involved in Crimes: Survey of Prison Inmates, 2016,” presents information ascertained via face-to-face interviews with some of the nearly 300,000 prisoners who used a gun in commission of a crime.


It shows that roughly “1.3 percent of prisoners obtained a gun from a retail source and used it during their offense.” Only 0.8 percent of prisoners acquired their guns at a gun show
 
In regards to the issue of gun rights, all I can think of lately is the case of Jayme Closs. After her father was shot and killed with a bullet that came thru his front door, Jayne and her mother huddled in the locked bathroom until the nut job broke the door down, killed her mother and the poor girl was in hell for 88 days. Imagine how things might have been different if her mother had a gun.
All I can think about is Europe, where the 21-year-old loser doesn't have a gun.
 
1. See the amount of guns in Europe and the amount of shooting deaths in Europe. 2. After that, look at those numbers for the US. The guy wouldn't have had a gun anywhere else...
How did the muslims get the guns used in the paris shooting?

Sorry, Despite Gun-Control Advocates' Claims, U.S. Isn't The Worst Country For Mass Shootings


  • 2/20/2018


Gun Deaths: It's become commonplace to hear after a U.S. shooting tragedy that, when it comes to guns, America is just more violent than other countries, especially those in Europe, where many countries have stiff gun control laws. It's a progressive shibboleth, but even some conservatives agree. The only problem is, it's not true.













Yes, America does have a lot of gun violence. But more than other countries, especially in Europe?

To listen to America's politicians, you'd think that was the case.




President Obama talked about it a lot, including in June of 2015, after a gunman shot nine people in a Charleston, North Carolina church: "Let's be clear: At some point, we as a country will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries," Obama said.

Days later, Sen. Harry Reid echoed his comments. "The United States is the only advanced country where this kind of mass violence occurs," he said.

More recently, the tragic, preventable slaying of 17 students by accused gunman Nikolas Cruz elicited similar sentiments from Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, speaking in the Senate just last Thursday: "This happens nowhere else other than the United States of America."

Powerful remarks, and no doubt heartfelt. But a study of global mass-shooting incidents from 2009 to 2015 by the Crime Prevention Research Center, headed by economist John Lott, shows the U.S. doesn't lead the world in mass shootings. In fact, it doesn't even make the top 10, when measured by death rate per million population from mass public shootings.

So who's tops? Surprisingly, Norway is, with an outlier mass shooting death rate of 1.888 per million (high no doubt because of the rifle assault by political extremist Anders Brevik that claimed 77 lives in 2011). No. 2 is Serbia, at just 0.381, followed by France at 0.347, Macedonia at 0.337, and Albania at 0.206. Slovakia, Finland, Belgium, and Czech Republic all follow. Then comes the U.S., at No. 11, with a death rate of 0.089.

That's not all. There were also 27% more casualties from 2009 to 2015 per mass shooting incident in the European Union than in the U.S.

"There were 16 cases where at least 15 people were killed," the study said. "Out of those cases, four were in the United States, two in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom."

"But the U.S. has a population four times greater than Germany's and five times the U.K.'s, so on a per-capita basis the U.S. ranks low in comparison — actually, those two countries would have had a frequency of attacks 1.96 (Germany) and 2.46 (UK) times higher."

Yes, the U.S. rate is still high, and nothing to be proud of. But it's not the highest in the developed world. Not by a long shot.

Yet, some today propose banning rifles, in particular AR-15s, because they've been used in a number of mass killings. It's important to note however that, according to FBI crime data cited this week by the Daily Caller, deaths by knives in the U.S. outnumber deaths by rifles by five to 1: In 2016, 1,604 people were killed by knives and other cutting instruments, while 374 were killed by rifles.

So is it not fair to ask: If we're banning rifles, why not knives, too?

The point is, guns aren't the problem; deranged killers that grow up in broken families often without positive male role models in their lives are the problem. So are political and religious extremists, in particular Islamists. If these people didn't have guns, they would find some other means to do the job.

Bombs are illegal in both the U.S. and Europe. Yet Europe loses far more people to bombings than the U.S. Doesn't that make them more violent?

In the most recent mass killing here in the U.S., what's upsetting is that Nikolas Cruz, as is usually the case, showed all the signs of a potential killer. He had been expelled from school. He made repeated violent threats. Deputies had made no fewer than 39 visits to his home. He left comments on a web video saying "I'm going to be a professional school shooter." After being notified about the disturbing message, the FBI looked into it, but did nothing.

In this, Cruz is typical. As columnist SE Cupp notes, "the stunning commonality in all these mass shootings ... is that the men who perpetrate them are sick — Las Vegas, Pulse nightclub, Newtown, Columbine, Charleston, Virginia Tech, Tucson, Aurora — on and on, these killers were mentally ill and in almost every case, someone knew it."

Sweeping gun control laws may sound good, but they won't keep handguns and rifles out of the hands of criminals. They will make it even harder for honest Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights, however.

Rather than politicizing the deaths of 17 people, Democrats and others should instead be pushing for better school security, and for our law enforcement agencies to respond more aggressively to clear threats. Those who are severely mentally ill or psychotic or potentially violent need help. And those that kill for political or religious reasons often show clear signs of being violent. No amount of gun control can stop that.
 
In regards to the issue of gun rights, all I can think of lately is the case of Jayme Closs. After her father was shot and killed with a bullet that came thru his front door, Jayne and her mother huddled in the locked bathroom until the nut job broke the door down, killed her mother and the poor girl was in hell for 88 days. Imagine how things might have been different if her mother had a gun.

Imagine if his mother had just aborted him and moved onto another......
Imagine.....

" I say....I say..... I say....sumptin weren't right with that boy.


b5c938be131cf8842c17bca6874a1962.jpg
 
1. See the amount of guns in Europe and the amount of shooting deaths in Europe. 2. After that, look at those numbers for the US. The guy wouldn't have had a gun anywhere else...
Please explain how he would not have a gun in Europe? Let's take Germany which I am familiar with hunting. There are 5.5 million legal guns in Germany. Saying that he would not have had a gun in Europe is wishful thinking.
 
Back
Top