All things disgusting with and around dump

C8EB9282-8EC9-46E4-A46B-811C7F0E83D6.jpegI remember the SD paper being a classic conservative mouthpiece. Maybe times have changed.

So here’s the WSJ. Same reporting on the federal felony criminal conviction of Arpaio. I think Murdoch owns both the WSJ and Fox News. Fox News being the mouthpiece for “HANNITY!”

That should end any nincompoop from trying to dispute Arpaio’s actual criminal conviction of a federal felony statute.
 
Nonononono said:
View attachment 2559I remember the SD paper being a classic conservative mouthpiece. Maybe times have changed.

So here’s the WSJ. Same reporting on the federal felony criminal conviction of Arpaio. I think Murdoch owns both the WSJ and Fox News. Fox News being the mouthpiece for “HANNITY!”

That should end any nincompoop from trying to dispute Arpaio’s actual criminal conviction of a federal felony statute.
Click to expand...

The Copleys' morning San Diego Union used to be Nixon's favorite newspaper, and the afternoon Tribune, while never directly disagreeing with the Union, took a slightly more centrist (rational) outlook on things. The Copleys laid off half the staff and declared it to be one paper - Union-Tribune. Then the whole empire was bought by Doug Manchester, a local rich man who wanted to own a paper. It swallowed up the North County Times (itself already a merger of Oceanside and Escondido papers) plus a few local papers (like the Poway/RB/PQ paper that had a different front page and masthead name in each of those communities but was pretty much the same inside). Then the UT et al was merged in with the LA Times in some big conglomerate I don't really understand (tronc? - all lower case) that is supposedly trying to sell off the U-T part to some alleged high-tech gazillionaire if he can really raise some cash. Since they will no longer have their own printing plant if that happens, it is likely to become an online-only "paper" if that all happens.

I used to get the daily Tribune (since delivery was scheduled so that it would be in my driveway when I got home at night when I had time to read it) plus the Poway Chieftain weekly. I switched to the North County Times when the U-T "merger" happened and then a few years ago dropped all the paper editions in favor of online news. Meanwhile the Poway (and now RB) paper became a free paper everybody gets weekly, although it is much thinner than it used to be.
 
espola said:
The Copleys' morning San Diego Union used to be Nixon's favorite newspaper, and the afternoon Tribune, while never directly disagreeing with the Union, took a slightly more centrist (rational) outlook on things. The Copleys laid off half the staff and declared it to be one paper - Union-Tribune. Then the whole empire was bought by Doug Manchester, a local rich man who wanted to own a paper. It swallowed up the North County Times (itself already a merger of Oceanside and Escondido papers) plus a few local papers (like the Poway/RB/PQ paper that had a different front page and masthead name in each of those communities but was pretty much the same inside). Then the UT et al was merged in with the LA Times in some big conglomerate I don't really understand (tronc? - all lower case) that is supposedly trying to sell off the U-T part to some alleged high-tech gazillionaire if he can really raise some cash. Since they will no longer have their own printing plant if that happens, it is likely to become an online-only "paper" if that all happens.

I used to get the daily Tribune (since delivery was scheduled so that it would be in my driveway when I got home at night when I had time to read it) plus the Poway Chieftain weekly. I switched to the North County Times when the U-T "merger" happened and then a few years ago dropped all the paper editions in favor of online news. Meanwhile the Poway (and now RB) paper became a free paper everybody gets weekly, although it is much thinner than it used to be.
Click to expand...
Man you are old. You subscribed to an afternoon paper?

I delivered an afternoon paper on my Stingray. The handlebars held the two ends of the burlap newspaper and each paper strategically folded and rubber banded for maximum throwing distance. The smell of that bag of rubber bands is the smell of ‘70s youth.

I do remember the Copley’s as owners. Hedgecock was Mayor. One of a string of corrupt SD mayors. My favorite was the guy that felt up Queen Elizabeth. Can never remember his name. Good times!
 
Nonononono said:
Man you are old. You subscribed to an afternoon paper?

I delivered an afternoon paper on my Stingray. The handlebars held the two ends of the burlap newspaper and each paper strategically folded and rubber banded for maximum throwing distance. The smell of that bag of rubber bands is the smell of ‘70s youth.

I do remember the Copley’s as owners. Hedgecock was Mayor. One of a string of corrupt SD mayors. My favorite was the guy that felt up Queen Elizabeth. Can never remember his name. Good times!
Click to expand...

Acting Mayor Bill Cleator (who was "acting" because Pete Wilson had become a US Senator). If you call that brief touch "feeling up" the Queen, then I must confess similarly feeling up some school teachers, cops, and nuns.

Poor Pete - he believed it when they told him he could be President if he just did what he was told.

From wikipedia -- In April 2017, Hedgecock sued the city of San Diego for "the loss of support, service, love, companionship, society, affection, relations and solace from his wife" (according to court records) after his wife broke her fake breast implants when she tripped on a public street; the lawsuit alleges that the sidewalk was uneven due to a nearby tree, causing Hedgecock's wife to fall.
 
Nonononono said:
View attachment 2559I remember the SD paper being a classic conservative mouthpiece. Maybe times have changed.

So here’s the WSJ. Same reporting on the federal felony criminal conviction of Arpaio. I think Murdoch owns both the WSJ and Fox News. Fox News being the mouthpiece for “HANNITY!”

That should end any nincompoop from trying to dispute Arpaio’s actual criminal conviction of a federal felony statute.
Click to expand...
The saying use to be, "Everything is negotiable", now we have, "Everything is spin-able".
 
Nonononono said:
Man you are old. You subscribed to an afternoon paper?

I delivered an afternoon paper on my Stingray. The handlebars held the two ends of the burlap newspaper and each paper strategically folded and rubber banded for maximum throwing distance. The smell of that bag of rubber bands is the smell of ‘70s youth.

I do remember the Copley’s as owners. Hedgecock was Mayor. One of a string of corrupt SD mayors. My favorite was the guy that felt up Queen Elizabeth. Can never remember his name. Good times!
Click to expand...


How's it feel to be a Lying Fraud......

I'll bet you got " Kicks " every day for poor delivery....

Yes I looked it up !
 
Obama was not perfect, but few presidents are. However, what he was able to do was unite the country in a way that hadn’t been seen for decades. Since Trump isn’t anywhere near as beloved, he has devoted much of his time and energy to undoing everything Obama has put in place. From affordable birth control and health care for women to policies that combat global warming and welcome immigration, Trump wants it all gone.

Political analyst David Gergen told CNN host Don Lemmon that, Trump’s various deals and policies are, “more about blowing up the former president’s legacy than anybody wants to admit.”

If there is one thing that Trump despises, it’s being disliked, but with his racist, misogynistic, and ignorant views, he hasn’t been able to escape the wrath of the public or Hollywood. He’s so disturbed by his low approval ratings that he will try anything to combat them.


In fact, in summer 2017, Trump shared an unverified poll that said 61% of the public believed he was a better president than Obama. OK, sir.

Poor Trump couldn’t even let us all enjoy Thanksgiving without trying to make a dig at Obama. During the Presidential Turkey pardon in 2017, he quipped,”As many of you know, I have been very active in overturning a number of executive actions by my predecessor. However, I have been informed by the White House counsel’s office that Tater and Tot’s pardons cannot, under any circumstances, be revoked.”


This might be funny if it weren’t so sad.


Though Obama is a democrat and Trump claims to be a Republican, Trump can’t even seem to find a middle ground when dealing with the more liberal party. In fact, a European diplomat who spent a great of time with Trump in the White House noticed he only really cared about the Harvard Law graduate’s position on things.

The diplomat told Buzzfeed,“He will ask: ‘Did Obama approve this?’ And if the answer is affirmative, he will say: ‘We don’t.’ He won’t even want to listen to the arguments or have a debate. He is obsessed with Obama.”

The main reason why Trump is obsessed with Obama is that he adores praise. It’s Obama’s work and policies that have put the United States in the great economic position that it’s in currently. Trump, of course, can’t accept this as fact.


If (or when) the economy takes a nosedive, Trump is going to have to answer for that.

Well before Trump even began to speak of getting into politics seriously, he went after Obama, claiming that he was not actually born in the U.S. In fact, it was Trump’s repeated appearances on Fox News that helped push the birther movement along.


Since the birther movement failed to discredit Obama, Trump is trying to do so with his own presidency. How ironic that he’s the one who has been riddled with scandals and sexual assault allegations.
 
Nonononono said:
View attachment 2559I remember the SD paper being a classic conservative mouthpiece. Maybe times have changed.

So here’s the WSJ. Same reporting on the federal felony criminal conviction of Arpaio. I think Murdoch owns both the WSJ and Fox News. Fox News being the mouthpiece for “HANNITY!”

That should end any nincompoop from trying to dispute Arpaio’s actual criminal conviction of a federal felony statute.
Click to expand...
He was found in contempt of court.....read up, edgamagate yoself.

Contempt of court, often referred to simply as "contempt", is the offense of being disobedient to or discourteous toward a court of law and its officers in the form of behavior that opposes or defies the authority, justice and dignity of the court.[1][2] It manifests itself in willful disregard of or disrespect for the authority of a court of law, which is often behavior that is illegal because it does not obey or respect the rules of a law court.[3][4]

There are broadly two categories of contempt: being rude or disrespectful to legal authorities in the courtroom, or willfully failing to obey a court order.[5] Contempt proceedings are especially used to enforce equitable remedies, such as injunctions.[6] In some jurisdictions, the refusal to respond to subpoena, to testify, to fulfill the obligations of a juror, or to provide certain information (with the exception of Fifth Amendment rights and legitimate concerns for personal safety following testimony[citation needed] in the United States) can constitute contempt of the court.

When a court decides that an action constitutes contempt of court, it can issue a court order that in the context of a court trial or hearing declares a person or organization to have disobeyed or been disrespectful of the court's authority, called "found" or "held" in contempt. That is the judge's strongest power to impose sanctions for acts that disrupt the court's normal process.

A finding of being in contempt of court may result from a failure to obey a lawful order of a court, showing disrespect for the judge, disruption of the proceedings through poor behavior, or publication of material or non-disclosure of material, which in doing so is deemed likely to jeopardize a fair trial. A judge may impose sanctions such as a fine or jail for someone found guilty of contempt of court. Judges in common law systems usually have more extensive power to declare someone in contempt than judges in civil law systems. The client or person must be proven guilty before being punished.
 
Lion Eyes said:
When Pete Wilson was mayor of San San Diego, I recall seeing a bumper sticker that read : OUR MAYOR IS A PETER
Click to expand...
His step son was an English teacher of mine in 9th grade.
Dude was fast. He chased and caught me when I took off running from his class one day.
Grabbed me by the scruff of the neck and shook me around some.

Later that year I saw him out surfing, just me and him on a day when there were big brush fires blowing around in what is now Santa Luz and Carmel Valley west of Penesquitos.
I was all by myself in the lineup, waves were overhead, and the Santa Anas were howling, I see this guy walking down the bluff with his board.
He paddles out, and its him.
We were both supposed to be in HIS class.

Turned out to be a pretty cool cat.
 
“When I started doing this kind of work 20 years ago, we were losing 70 kids a year at work, and now we are losing usually 20 or less. We’ve made substantial progress, and I think that the tightened hazardous occupations rules have played a role in the lowered death tolls for teenage workers. So I would not be in favor of relaxing any of these standards; I think it would be a tragic mistake and would lead to the death of teenage workers,” Reid Maki, coordinator of the Child Labor Coalition, told Bloomberg Law.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trump-administration-wants-unwind-child-labor-laws-194638209.html
 
Hüsker Dü said:
“When I started doing this kind of work 20 years ago, we were losing 70 kids a year at work, and now we are losing usually 20 or less. We’ve made substantial progress, and I think that the tightened hazardous occupations rules have played a role in the lowered death tolls for teenage workers. So I would not be in favor of relaxing any of these standards; I think it would be a tragic mistake and would lead to the death of teenage workers,” Reid Maki, coordinator of the Child Labor Coalition, told Bloomberg Law.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trump-administration-wants-unwind-child-labor-laws-194638209.html
Click to expand...
Fake News.
 
Ya gain one you lose one . . .

When Guns N’ Roses releases its “Appetite for Destruction: Locked N’ Loaded” box set next month, one notable — and notorious — track will be missing: “One In A Million.” Written by Axl Rose, the band’s mercurial lead singer, that 1988 song denounced African-Americans, immigrants, and gay men in derogatory terms. At the time, Rose defended the song, saying his beliefs about these maligned groups justified his excoriation of them. Now that song, practically a Trump supporter’s anthem, will remain an ugly relic from the era of Reaganomics and Jheri curls. Does this mean Axl Rose is woke?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Ya gain one you lose one . . .

When Guns N’ Roses releases its “Appetite for Destruction: Locked N’ Loaded” box set next month, one notable — and notorious — track will be missing: “One In A Million.” Written by Axl Rose, the band’s mercurial lead singer, that 1988 song denounced African-Americans, immigrants, and gay men in derogatory terms. At the time, Rose defended the song, saying his beliefs about these maligned groups justified his excoriation of them. Now that song, practically a Trump supporter’s anthem, will remain an ugly relic from the era of Reaganomics and Jheri curls. Does this mean Axl Rose is woke?
Click to expand...
Rose is Anti Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top