2020...

Are there any libs that aren't lying crooks?
You people are toast in 2020.

Sore Loser Stacey Abrams Just Got Hit with an Investigation Announcement, & a Subpoena’s Coming Soon

Posted at 9:28 am on April 12, 2019 by Alex Parker












Stacey Abrams is creating a very sour legacy for herself.

The Georgia gubernatorial contender…what’s that word? Oh, yeah — lost — in November, after making it clear she was in favor of confiscating rifles from the state’s citizenry. Leading up to the election, which she — what was it again? Oh yeah, lost — she made it equally clear she refused to be transparent about her firearm-seizing plans (here and here). That’s a recipe for…losing.

Yet, she can’t seem to remember that she lost. Or to accept it.

Hence, for months after the defeat, she raged against the unfair machine, crying corruption and dirty tricks (here, here, here, and here). And subsequently making herself look — in my opinion — substantially not good. She refused to accept that the Peach state didn’t wanna sample the sweet nectar of a gun-confiscatin’ governor.





Add absurd posturing from people like Hillary Clinton, and you had a real stinkfest (here).

Now the fruit’s grown more rotten with the advent of an investigation into Abrams by Georgia’s state ethics commission.


Stefan Ritter — who stepped down after being accused of watching porn at work — was alleged to have ordered staff to stall any probes into elections campaign impropriety.

But David Emadi ain’t stallin’.

Unsurprisingly, Stacey’s team is claiming any charges of wrongdoing is baloney. Former campaign manager Luren Groh-Wargo told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution the whole thing is an abuse of power:

“The Abrams campaign worked diligently to ensure compliance throughout the election and, had we been notified of any irregularities, would have immediately taken action to rectify them. The new ethics chief — a Kemp donor and former Republican Party leader — is using his power to threaten and lob baseless partisan accusations at the former Abrams campaign when they should be focused on real problems like the unethical ties between the governor’s office and voting machine lobbyists instead.”

An appearance of potential partisanship is there — David Emadi formerly served as an officer in the Douglas County Republican Party, and all the politicians he’s fingering for investigation (including Atlanta mayoral candidates) are Democrats.

Regardless, Emadi’s in charge, and the wheels are turning — moving distinctly toward Stacey Abrams:





“What I can say about the investigation into the Abrams campaign is, in the relatively near future, I expect we will be issuing subpoenas for bank and finance records of both Miss Abrams and various PACs and special-interest groups that were affiliated with her campaign.”

Scrutiny looms, for a lady who’s relentlessly cried foul since her crushing defeat. It’s brought all the wrong kind of attention to her, which only makes news of the probe resonate more loudly across the political arena. If the investigation moves far forward, its negative light upon the 2020 hopeful (here) will continue to be amplified by her blaming of others for her gubernatorial fail.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Are there any libs that aren't lying crooks?
You people are toast in 2020.

Sore Loser Stacey Abrams Just Got Hit with an Investigation Announcement, & a Subpoena’s Coming Soon

Posted at 9:28 am on April 12, 2019 by Alex Parker












Stacey Abrams is creating a very sour legacy for herself.

The Georgia gubernatorial contender…what’s that word? Oh, yeah — lost — in November, after making it clear she was in favor of confiscating rifles from the state’s citizenry. Leading up to the election, which she — what was it again? Oh yeah, lost — she made it equally clear she refused to be transparent about her firearm-seizing plans (here and here). That’s a recipe for…losing.

Yet, she can’t seem to remember that she lost. Or to accept it.

Hence, for months after the defeat, she raged against the unfair machine, crying corruption and dirty tricks (here, here, here, and here). And subsequently making herself look — in my opinion — substantially not good. She refused to accept that the Peach state didn’t wanna sample the sweet nectar of a gun-confiscatin’ governor.





Add absurd posturing from people like Hillary Clinton, and you had a real stinkfest (here).

Now the fruit’s grown more rotten with the advent of an investigation into Abrams by Georgia’s state ethics commission.


Stefan Ritter — who stepped down after being accused of watching porn at work — was alleged to have ordered staff to stall any probes into elections campaign impropriety.

But David Emadi ain’t stallin’.

Unsurprisingly, Stacey’s team is claiming any charges of wrongdoing is baloney. Former campaign manager Luren Groh-Wargo told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution the whole thing is an abuse of power:

“The Abrams campaign worked diligently to ensure compliance throughout the election and, had we been notified of any irregularities, would have immediately taken action to rectify them. The new ethics chief — a Kemp donor and former Republican Party leader — is using his power to threaten and lob baseless partisan accusations at the former Abrams campaign when they should be focused on real problems like the unethical ties between the governor’s office and voting machine lobbyists instead.”

An appearance of potential partisanship is there — David Emadi formerly served as an officer in the Douglas County Republican Party, and all the politicians he’s fingering for investigation (including Atlanta mayoral candidates) are Democrats.

Regardless, Emadi’s in charge, and the wheels are turning — moving distinctly toward Stacey Abrams:





“What I can say about the investigation into the Abrams campaign is, in the relatively near future, I expect we will be issuing subpoenas for bank and finance records of both Miss Abrams and various PACs and special-interest groups that were affiliated with her campaign.”

Scrutiny looms, for a lady who’s relentlessly cried foul since her crushing defeat. It’s brought all the wrong kind of attention to her, which only makes news of the probe resonate more loudly across the political arena. If the investigation moves far forward, its negative light upon the 2020 hopeful (here) will continue to be amplified by her blaming of others for her gubernatorial fail.
Click to expand...


Melanin content/Racism in 3.....2.....1

The color card is beyond old.

A crime is a crime any and all times....
 
Ohio Democrat Advocates Race-Based Extermination? Pushes to Exempt Black Babies From the State’s Pro-Life Law

Posted at 8:50 pm on April 15, 2019 by Alex Parker












Does the Left hope to abort black babies in particular?

They’ve made some moves toward doing so.

The WNBA ran a campaign last May to promote Planned Parenthood (here). In August, a Texas abortion clinic sponsored a billboard telling minority mothers to #TrustBlackWomen and abort their babies because “abortion is self-care” (here).

And now, a Democratic politician in Ohio wants to except black babies from the state’s fetal heartbeat bill.

State Rep. Janine Boyd evidently wants as many specifically-black babies as possible to be aborted, as reported by LifeNews:

On Tuesday during a state House Health Committee meeting, [Janine] proposed Amendment 0291 to add the exemption.

Boyd likened restrictions on abortion to slavery as she urged her fellow lawmakers to support the measure.

…

“Black slaves were once treated like cattle and put out to stud in order to create generations of more slaves,” she said. “Our country is not far enough beyond our history to legislate as if it is.”

Mark Harrington — president of the pro-life Created Equal — called out Janine’s apparent desire for race-based extermination:

“Referencing abortion to avoid consigning children to slavery, she seems to suggest black children today should likewise not be born—which is exactly the purpose of her amendment. Every human being is valuable regardless of the color of his or her skin. To suggest that only black babies should be killed in Ohio is shocking racism not befitting of a representative of the Ohio House.”

Yep.

Ohio’s bill is significant:





The heartbeat bill passed the state legislature Thursday. It would prohibit abortions after an unborn baby’s heartbeat is detectable, about six weeks of pregnancy, in Ohio. Because many women do not even know they are pregnant at this early stage, the legislation could protect almost all unborn babies in Ohio if it goes into effect.

But it won’t protect black babies, if Democrat Janine Boyd can help it.

What would happen if a Republican tried to exempt black children from an abortion law? I think we all know it wouldn’t be nothing.
 
messy said:
It's browning either way...and fast!
Click to expand...

Who frickin cares.....

Character or lack there of is what's destroying the heart and soul of America....

What's very sad is you have NO idea of what I am pointing out....thus your unintelligent posts.
 
nononono said:
Who frickin cares.....

Character or lack there of is what's destroying the heart and soul of America....

What's very sad is you have NO idea of what I am pointing out....thus your unintelligent posts.
Click to expand...
You prove your complete lack of character daily on this board with your hate-mothering conspiracy theories and your rants against “criminal” democrats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top