2020...

messy said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Buttigieg
Click to expand...
Buttplug has no chance, butt I see why he interests you.



Buttigieg: A Figure Like Trump 'Should Never Have Been Able to Come Within Cheating Distance of the Oval Office'

Q8RpiwD9-720.jpg

PAM KEY 24 Mar 2019
Sunday on MSNBC, 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg said “a figure like” President Donald Trump “should never have been able to come within cheating distance of the Oval Office.”





Addressing Attorney General William Barr’s letter summarizing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings, Buttigieg said, “The president is not being indicted at the moment and also has not been exonerated at the moment. From a political perspective, I think this is further evidence it would be a mistake for Democrats to think that the way for the Trump presidency to end is by way of investigation. That could, of course, happen. But we’ve got to be paying attention to the kinds of conditions that made it possible for somebody like him to get here in the first place. I would argue with—a figure like this president should never have been able to come within cheating distance of the Oval Office. And I fear if we’re not paying attention to the causes that he’s a symptom of, then not only is it possible for him to succeed in 2020, but we could also find ourselves with another figure like him or even worse in the future.”
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Buttplug has no chance, butt I see why he interests you.



Buttigieg: A Figure Like Trump 'Should Never Have Been Able to Come Within Cheating Distance of the Oval Office'

Q8RpiwD9-720.jpg

PAM KEY 24 Mar 2019
Sunday on MSNBC, 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg said “a figure like” President Donald Trump “should never have been able to come within cheating distance of the Oval Office.”





Addressing Attorney General William Barr’s letter summarizing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings, Buttigieg said, “The president is not being indicted at the moment and also has not been exonerated at the moment. From a political perspective, I think this is further evidence it would be a mistake for Democrats to think that the way for the Trump presidency to end is by way of investigation. That could, of course, happen. But we’ve got to be paying attention to the kinds of conditions that made it possible for somebody like him to get here in the first place. I would argue with—a figure like this president should never have been able to come within cheating distance of the Oval Office. And I fear if we’re not paying attention to the causes that he’s a symptom of, then not only is it possible for him to succeed in 2020, but we could also find ourselves with another figure like him or even worse in the future.”
Click to expand...
I understand your concern. Dumbshit, hate-filled, gullible idiots like you are the “conditions” he’s talking about, right?
 
messy said:
I understand your concern. Dumbshit, hate-filled, gullible idiots like you are the “conditions” he’s talking about, right?
Click to expand...
We've had a part black president and that didn't turn out well, we weren't ready for a woman, at least that woman and now you want a queer president?
Where do they get you people?
 
She'll fat right in.
stacey-abrams.jpg

Stacey Abrams’ nonprofit group’s spending may trip her up

JAZZ SHAW Posted at 4:01 pm on March 24, 2019

As Democrats around the nation rush to push failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams as The Next Great Hope for their party’s future, a possible glitch with the FEC may introduce a couple of bumps into that road. An FEC complaint has been filed against Abrams’ nonprofit group, Fair Fight Action. Ostensibly formed to “advance voting rights” in Georgia, the group has been dumping a lot of money into promoting Abrams herself, clearly with an eye toward her future electoral prospects. Whether this would represent an actual violation – either now or in the future – is an open question, but it certainly doesn’t look good. (Fox News)












Spending by Fair Fight Action, a nonprofit that former Georgia House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams founded to advance voting rights, and which is staffed by former Abrams campaign aides, is prompting questions about whether it’s inappropriately supporting her political ambitions.

In a matter of months, Abrams has gone from losing the Georgia governor’s race to being a heavily recruited Democratic star, urged to run for Senate and mentioned as a possible presidential contender.

On Wednesday, a GOP-affiliated group called the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, or FACT, filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service. The group pointed to roughly $100,000 worth of Facebook ads featuring Abrams, an advertisement for a “Stacey Abrams Fundraiser” that featured Fair Fight Action’s logo, travel for Abrams’ post-election “thank you” tour of Georgia and a professionally produced “highlight reel” of Abrams footage on the group’s website.

As I said above, the complaint filed by the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust may or may not hold water at this point. As of today, Abrams isn’t running for anything, so the money can’t be considered any sort of illegal campaign contribution as there is no campaign to contribute to. There is a portion of the applicable law that forbids nonprofits from creating a “private benefit” to a specific person or group, but that law is so vague that it might be tough to pursue a case here.






It’s obviously a stretch to say that paying for a “thank you tour” and producing “highlight reels” from her gubernatorial campaign constitutes spending money to advance voting rights. But she’s the chair of her own group’s board of directors, so if the people donating to that PAC don’t have an issue with it, she might be able to skate by.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
We've had a part black president and that didn't turn out well, we weren't ready for a woman, at least that woman and now you want a queer president?
Where do they get you people?
Click to expand...
When a president’s closest advisers go to jail for being crooked and the president himself obstructs justice (.Mueller said it was an open question that he wouldn’t decide), you need people like obama in charge who have integrity. Buttegieg clearly has what it takes, and your sexual obsession with him means you’re just like the gals were with JFK. It helps!
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Buttplug has no chance, butt I see why he interests you.



Buttigieg: A Figure Like Trump 'Should Never Have Been Able to Come Within Cheating Distance of the Oval Office'

Q8RpiwD9-720.jpg

PAM KEY 24 Mar 2019
Sunday on MSNBC, 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg said “a figure like” President Donald Trump “should never have been able to come within cheating distance of the Oval Office.”





Addressing Attorney General William Barr’s letter summarizing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings, Buttigieg said, “The president is not being indicted at the moment and also has not been exonerated at the moment. From a political perspective, I think this is further evidence it would be a mistake for Democrats to think that the way for the Trump presidency to end is by way of investigation. That could, of course, happen. But we’ve got to be paying attention to the kinds of conditions that made it possible for somebody like him to get here in the first place. I would argue with—a figure like this president should never have been able to come within cheating distance of the Oval Office. And I fear if we’re not paying attention to the causes that he’s a symptom of, then not only is it possible for him to succeed in 2020, but we could also find ourselves with another figure like him or even worse in the future.”
Click to expand...

I don't understand this post in the slightest. Why does it matter to you who he sleeps with? Why would you think it effects his ability to do his job? More importantly why would you think it matters to my vote? (Unless of course we're talking about a Roy Moore type who takes advantage of non-consenting adults. Then I say let's hang the bastard.)
 
messy said:
When a president’s closest advisers go to jail for being crooked and the president himself obstructs justice (.Mueller said it was an open question that he wouldn’t decide), you need people like obama in charge who have integrity. Buttegieg clearly has what it takes, and your sexual obsession with him means you’re just like the gals were with JFK. It helps!
Click to expand...

I saw Buttegieg is up to #3 in the polls. Sounds like I might have been hasty on my no-charisma assessment.
 
tenacious said:
I don't understand this post in the slightest. Why does it matter to you who he sleeps with? Why would you think it effects his ability to do his job? More importantly why would you think it matters to my vote? (Unless of course we're talking about a Roy Moore type who takes advantage of non-consenting adults. Then I say let's hang the bastard.)
Click to expand...
The country is not ready for him/her.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
The country is not ready for him/her.
Click to expand...

Says the guy who spends all day reading right wing news and spewing hate on a youth soccer forum with a bunch of fake screen names...
Forgive me if I don't buy into the idea that you are in a position to speak for America.
 
Last edited:
tenacious said:
Says the guy who spends all day reading right wing news and spewing hate on a youth soccer forum with a bunch of fake screen names...
Forgive me if I don't buy into the idea that you are in a position to speak for America.
Click to expand...
Can you please tell me my other names?
 
I think most reasonable dem's agree with Sharpton on this. But of course what subject to move onto. Heath care is one I keep hearing brought up, although given that at it's heart what health care reform really comes down to is putting more costs on they young to pay for the aging baby-boomers... I question if this is really winning topic for dems.

How long do the boomers believe they can keep piling their expenses on future generations before the future generations start saying we're getting screwed?


MSNBC's Sharpton: Democrats have to 'move on' after 'clear victory' for Trump
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/...have-to-move-on-after-clear-victory-for-trump

MSNBC host Al Sharpton advised Democrats to "move on and really deal with hard issues" following special counsel Robert Mueller concluded that President Trump and his campaign associates did not collude or conspire with Russian officials leading up to the 2016 election.

"Democrats also now have to move on and really deal with hard issues," Sharpton said on the network during special programming late Sunday. "I think the politics is that we're now going to have to start talking about tax reform and climate change and other things because the Mueller situation, I think, has ended up a clear victory for the president."

"Reverend Al, listen, you have said this all along," said fellow MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, who joined Sharpton after Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein provided Congress with a summary of the Mueller report, which sent shockwaves through Washington and the country.

"A lot of Democrats haven't figured this out over the past couple of years," Scarborough also said. "They have been distracted by the Mueller investigation, but you have understood and I think the smarter people in the Democratic Party have understood, that they were never going to win elections talking about Russia. They were never going to win elections talking about Robert Mueller.

"They're going to win elections talking about — and by the way, check the tape. This isn't Monday morning quarterbacking again. We have said it on the air together and you've said it and I've said it. It's health care that people are concerned about. It's wages that people are concerned about," Scarborough added.

Democrats are demanding that the complete Mueller report be made public, with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) saying the Barr letter “raises as many questions as it answers," particularly around obstruction of justice.

The Trump campaign is already on the offensive in the wake of the summary release of Mueller's findings. The president has a campaign event later this week, when it's almost certain he'll make the Mueller report a central theme.
Click to expand...
 
tenacious said:
I think most reasonable dem's agree with Sharpton on this. But of course what subject to move onto. Heath care is one I keep hearing brought up, although given that at it's heart what health care reform really comes down to is putting more costs on they young to pay for the aging baby-boomers... I question if this is really winning topic for dems.

How long do the boomers believe they can keep piling their expenses on future generations before the future generations start saying we're getting screwed?
Click to expand...
Not too many reasonable dems these days, just look at the crop of 2018 congressmen.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Can you please tell me my other names?
Click to expand...

nono and any of the other wack-a-doodles that have come and gone...
It's just statistics. There really aren't that many rightwing nutjobs out there. So the probability that there could be more then just you on this site is near impossible.
 
tenacious said:
nono and any of the other wack-a-doodles that have come and gone...
It's just statistics. There really aren't that many rightwing nutjobs out there. So the probability that there could be more then just you on this site is near impossible.
Click to expand...
And here I thought you were just stupid, how did that Hillary vote work out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top