Sheriff Joe
DA
Who Cares?How many of Trump’s close associates are in jail?
At least he's not Hillary.
Who Cares?How many of Trump’s close associates are in jail?
Paul Manafort, charged with nothing to do with Russian Collusion. Facts. Dates back to 2006 to 2014. Long before Trump.
"What are the charges?
The 32-count indictment charged Mr. Manafort with disguising more than $30 million in overseas income by moving it through offshore accounts, lying to banks and evading taxes.
Prosecutors claim that beginning in 2006, Mr. Manafort hid millions of dollars in income that he received from the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian oligarchs to promote a pro-Russian leader, Viktor Yanukovych. When Mr. Yanukovych fled to Russia after a popular uprising in 2014, prosecutors say, the spigot of funds from Ukraine dried up. They charge that Mr. Manafort then resorted to bank fraud to maintain his lifestyle."
In 2006 jackass. Are you retarded or something?"...he received from the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian oligarchs to promote a pro-Russian leader..."
How many of Trump’s close associates are in jail?
And also, you need to let black people know that Dems are racist. Oh wait, you mean racist against whites? LOL.
In 2006 jackass. Are you retarded or something?
Please continue. You're doing great. No one is laughing at you.
Nope, I'm done. Debating Dems is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon does not follow the rules/facts, walks around, knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board, and then claims victory.
That's the problem with this world today. Your feelings are more important than actual facts.
Nope, I'm done. Debating Dems is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon does not follow the rules/facts, walks around, knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board, and then claims victory.
That's the problem with this world today. Your feelings are more important than actual facts.
bothIn 2006 jackass. Are you retarded or something?
UrinidiotObviously pretty much all of Joe's responses to this post are trash. That said, I am curious on your take on racism? Like if I heard, through the paper thin wall of my office, a mixed group of white / asian homosexual / straight women talking about how they don't like working with white straight men... would you consider that racist/sexist? Or what if it was a group of black women... does that make it okay?
I only ask because I've always said I'm against racism period. But it seems like that's not really politically in vogue anymore as your post seems to allude to... or is talk of not agreeing with any type of racism at all just me speaking from a position of privilege?
Howard Schultz laments 'character assassination' as he mulls 2020 White House run
https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...er-assassination-as-he-mulls-2020-white-house
Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz reportedly said Monday he "never thought" he would get so much criticism for his potential 2020 White House bid.
During a book event in Alabama, Schultz expressed surprise at what he called "character assassination" he says he's faced from Democrats since expressing interest in a third-party run, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
“I’ve never thought I’d be criticized as much. I didn’t think this would be a character assassination [from Democrats]," Schultz said. "I think the concerns the American people have are greater than the threat to the two-party system.”
Schultz went on to tell CNN's Van Jones, as he has said before, that he does not intend to "jeopardize" the chances of removing President Trump from the Oval Office.
“I don’t think that answer can be answered in March of 2019. We’re 18 months away and a lot could happen,” he reportedly added. “I won’t do anything to jeopardize the critical importance of removing this president from the Oval Office.”
Schultz's comments come as he has faced weeks of criticism from prominent 2020 Democrats including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for hinting at a third-party bid. They have accused him of using his substantial wealth to "buy" political influence and raise clout around his announcement, fearing he could split the liberal vote.
OMG, MSM, OBVI, WTF?It is true though... can't really think of any coverage on Schultz that has been positive. Only negative hit pieces...
You must be just playing dumb with your posts this morning.lol
As always I welcome your hate JoJo.
Because the dossier isn't fake, dumbshit. American Justice. You don't like it, crawl back under your rock.George Papadopoulos, business as usual. If below is true, then why has no one from the FAKE Dossier been charged yet? Double standard.
George Papadopoulos, 31, pleaded guilty in October to lying to the FBI about key details of his conversations with a London-based professor who had told him the Russians held “dirt,” in the form of thousands of emails, on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Listen, you butt-hurt little punk...of course you're chickening out. You're the one who doesn't like facts. Your boys are all going to jail. Isn't that a fact?Nope, I'm done. Debating Dems is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon does not follow the rules/facts, walks around, knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board, and then claims victory.
That's the problem with this world today. Your feelings are more important than actual facts.
"Democrats can't get past her Indian heritage fakery" (said no democrat ever)
lol where do you find these article Joe?