2020...

Another candied ass libtard lady that wants to punish successful people for failed demotard leadership. He needs to go.


What Happens When Rich People Leave California?
By Andy Caldwell

Long before Phil Mickelson wondered out loud if higher taxes will force him to leave the State of California, Tiger Woods did just that! Moving to another desirable coastal state, in Tiger’s case, Florida, saved him millions of dollars per year, as he escaped California’s ridiculously high income tax. The fact that California has since raised the top tax rate again, this time to 13%, more top earners are leaving and they are taking their money and all it represents with them.
Mickelson’s example tells the story of somebody who was not only earning money in this state, but a man who wanted to reinvest his earnings here. People who make a lot of money invest their excess earnings in a number of ways in order to diversify and protect their assets. In the meantime, their investments morph into jobs for other people. So, the people leaving the state because of high taxes will now be investing elsewhere for the same reason.
We all spend money as consumers, buying cars, houses, and the like. But now these people fleeing California will also consume elsewhere because most states do not have our high sales tax rates either!
California’s once solid gold reputation is now just a cracked gold patina revealing a rust to the core of our former world-class economy. The industries who are still left here were started when taxes and regulations were more favorable. They are now referred to as legacy industries. The truth of the matter is there are no new industry clusters being created in California. Once a start up is ready to grow, they locate the manufacturing headquarters out of state or in another country altogether.
I personally know a half-dozen people here on the Central Coast who have already moved or are in the course of moving to avoid the government taking most all of their profit in the form of taxes. One friend has already moved to Washington. Another to Florida. They will be able to save tens of thousands of dollars each year, and at the same time, move into a bigger house for less money than what they have here. Higher quality of life at a lower cost, what is not to love?
The problem with tax and spend democrats, like the ones who now constitute a super-majority in Sacramento, is that they think they can make changes in the tax and regulatory codes and business will continue as usual. But, people make changes in their lifestyle to adapt to changes in their environment all the time. If it becomes too expensive to live here, well then, those that can will simply move elsewhere.
If you are one of the people whose class-envy has been stoked by President Obama and Governor Brown, well, what goes around comes around. You were part of the majority who decided to stick it to the rich guy, but the rich guy has other options! You will now not have as many job opportunities available for yourself, and the burdens of our high tax state and huge welfare class will now disproportionately fall on you!

The very rich know a trick that is not available to you! They can afford to maintain more than one residence. They will claim their main domicile in a State with no income tax, and only visit their California abode for a limited time each year. They avoid paying state income tax and now you will be paying their bill at the end of the year! They did not get rich by being stupid and they won’t stay rich by being timid.
Andy Caldwell is the Executive Director of COLAB and the host of The Andy Caldwell Show weekdays from 3-5 pm on AM1440 and AM1290.

 
‘Not the Golden State anymore’: Middle- and low-income people leaving California
BY KATE CIMINI
JANUARY 8, 2020


In 2017, Susanna Cardenas-Lopez left her home in Salinas to visit her brother in Idaho. Three days into her trip, she called her husband and told him they needed to move there.

Back in Salinas, Cardenas-Lopez and her husband were left out in the cold after their landlord decided to stop renting the home they lived in. They couldn’t afford anything else, so they had to move in with a family member, which was stressful.

Now in Idaho, she and her husband have free time and money left over at the end of each month. There’s a bonus — the area is significantly safer, she said.

“I feel like it’s a dream with the quality of life we now have,” Cardenas-Lopez said. “Yes, the pay is less, but that just doesn’t even seem to matter to me. At least we have enough to pay our rent and bills.”

Many of her family members face the same situation. Five months ago, her 35-year-old daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren left Salinas after their rent increased from $1,300 to $2,000 in just three years, she said.

“I love California, but it’s just not the Golden State in my eyes anymore,” she said.

Cardenas-Lopez isn’t alone. U.S. Census Bureau numbers show that the middle- and lower-classes are leaving California at a higher rate than the wealthy. Many who have left in recent years say they simply couldn’t afford to stay.

Cost of living: the defining issue
In the second quarter of 2019, the San Francisco Bay Area topped Los Angeles, Washington and Chicago when it came to people leaving major U.S. cities. It was second only to New York City. More than 28,190 people departed the Bay Area during those three months, close to double 2017’s rate, according to a regular migration report from real estate brokerage Redfin.

In 2018, according to the U.S. Census, about 190,000 more people left the Golden State than moved there. It was the second year in a row of the negative trend. However, the population is still rising due to the birth rate. California added 141,300 residents between July 2018 and July 2019, bringing its population to an estimated 39.96 million people, according to the California Department of Finance.

 
Dissent is a necessary ingredient for change. But in a system of government that provides for peaceful change there is no cause that justifies resort to violence.

Let us recognize that the first civil right is to be free from domestic violence. So I pledge to you, we shall have order.
 
What Happens When Rich People Leave California?
By Andy Caldwell

Long before Phil Mickelson wondered out loud if higher taxes will force him to leave the State of California, Tiger Woods did just that! Moving to another desirable coastal state, in Tiger’s case, Florida, saved him millions of dollars per year, as he escaped California’s ridiculously high income tax. The fact that California has since raised the top tax rate again, this time to 13%, more top earners are leaving and they are taking their money and all it represents with them.
Mickelson’s example tells the story of somebody who was not only earning money in this state, but a man who wanted to reinvest his earnings here. People who make a lot of money invest their excess earnings in a number of ways in order to diversify and protect their assets. In the meantime, their investments morph into jobs for other people. So, the people leaving the state because of high taxes will now be investing elsewhere for the same reason.
We all spend money as consumers, buying cars, houses, and the like. But now these people fleeing California will also consume elsewhere because most states do not have our high sales tax rates either!
California’s once solid gold reputation is now just a cracked gold patina revealing a rust to the core of our former world-class economy. The industries who are still left here were started when taxes and regulations were more favorable. They are now referred to as legacy industries. The truth of the matter is there are no new industry clusters being created in California. Once a start up is ready to grow, they locate the manufacturing headquarters out of state or in another country altogether.
I personally know a half-dozen people here on the Central Coast who have already moved or are in the course of moving to avoid the government taking most all of their profit in the form of taxes. One friend has already moved to Washington. Another to Florida. They will be able to save tens of thousands of dollars each year, and at the same time, move into a bigger house for less money than what they have here. Higher quality of life at a lower cost, what is not to love?
The problem with tax and spend democrats, like the ones who now constitute a super-majority in Sacramento, is that they think they can make changes in the tax and regulatory codes and business will continue as usual. But, people make changes in their lifestyle to adapt to changes in their environment all the time. If it becomes too expensive to live here, well then, those that can will simply move elsewhere.
If you are one of the people whose class-envy has been stoked by President Obama and Governor Brown, well, what goes around comes around. You were part of the majority who decided to stick it to the rich guy, but the rich guy has other options! You will now not have as many job opportunities available for yourself, and the burdens of our high tax state and huge welfare class will now disproportionately fall on you!

The very rich know a trick that is not available to you! They can afford to maintain more than one residence. They will claim their main domicile in a State with no income tax, and only visit their California abode for a limited time each year. They avoid paying state income tax and now you will be paying their bill at the end of the year! They did not get rich by being stupid and they won’t stay rich by being timid.
Andy Caldwell is the Executive Director of COLAB and the host of The Andy Caldwell Show weekdays from 3-5 pm on AM1440 and AM1290.

Florida is not a desirable area for anyone with any sense.
 
Tell it to Tiger and all those retired folks from New York and Jersey.....
Yeah...Florida is terrible.

Great weather
Low taxes
Superior biz environment vs places like CA, NY, NJ etc.
Etc.

I wonder what Husker is talking about? Don't answer. Even he has no idea what he is talking about.
 
It was a debate...it was a debate.

Never answered the question....because she cannot rationally explain how her positions towards Biden have changed other than the want for power.

The Dem Party. Fighting against racism and misogyny by picking a VP candidate based and race and sex.
Somebody sounds very scared.
She’s very popular.
A great choice.
The racists and misogynists definitely don’t like her, as we’ve noticed.
 
Somebody sounds very scared.
She’s very popular.
A great choice.
The racists and misogynists definitely don’t like her, as we’ve noticed.

That would be your party......!
And by the way......I suggested you stop while posting !
It's obvious as hell what's going on in that slushy grey matter of yours.
She's now married to a " White " guy.

And " Willie " already got her...!

https://s.hdnux.com/photos/01/00/14/37/16828358/11/420x0.jpg
 
Kamala is definitely damaged goods.
Her poor husband is gonna have to hear about her past forever.
Snatch ain’t worth that.
FOX NEWS FLASHPublished August 13, 2020 Last Update 4 days ago
Author claims Harris 'deep-sixed' release of documents ID'ing clergy accused of sex abuse as city DA
'It's a massive cover-up,' Peter Schweizer tells 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'

By Charles Creitz | Fox News

Presumptive Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris' handling of cases involving alleged child sex abuse by Catholic priests while she was San Francisco District Attorney should receive more scrutiny, investigative journalist and author Peter Schweizer told "Tucker Carlson Tonight" Wednesday.

Schweizer told host Tucker Carlson that when Harris took office in 2004, her predecessor, Democrat Terence Hallinan, left her with "hundreds of pages" of internal Catholic Church documents that included names of 40 accused clergy.


"Hallinan was using those documents to build criminal cases and he was also planning to release them after redacting the names of victims," he said. "Kamala Harris actually deep-sixed ... those documents, and those documents disappeared, much to the chagrin of victims' groups.


"So it’s a massive cover-up and a lot of the people that financed her campaign to beat Hallinan were law firms and lawyers and people connected to the church hierarchy who did not want those documents to come out."

CHRIS WALLACE SAYS KAMALA HARRIS 'DOESN'T DO ANY HARM' TO BIDEN'S CHANCES

In June 2019, the Associated Press published a report headlined, "Victims' question Kamala Harris' record on clergy abuse" in which survivors of clergy abuse and their attorneys claimed Harris was consistently silent on the Catholic Church’s abuse scandal — first as district attorney in San Francisco and later as California’s attorney general.
 
Kamala is definitely damaged goods.
Her poor husband is gonna have to hear about her past forever.
Snatch ain’t worth that.
FOX NEWS FLASHPublished August 13, 2020 Last Update 4 days ago
Author claims Harris 'deep-sixed' release of documents ID'ing clergy accused of sex abuse as city DA
'It's a massive cover-up,' Peter Schweizer tells 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'

By Charles Creitz | Fox News

Presumptive Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris' handling of cases involving alleged child sex abuse by Catholic priests while she was San Francisco District Attorney should receive more scrutiny, investigative journalist and author Peter Schweizer told "Tucker Carlson Tonight" Wednesday.

Schweizer told host Tucker Carlson that when Harris took office in 2004, her predecessor, Democrat Terence Hallinan, left her with "hundreds of pages" of internal Catholic Church documents that included names of 40 accused clergy.


"Hallinan was using those documents to build criminal cases and he was also planning to release them after redacting the names of victims," he said. "Kamala Harris actually deep-sixed ... those documents, and those documents disappeared, much to the chagrin of victims' groups.


"So it’s a massive cover-up and a lot of the people that financed her campaign to beat Hallinan were law firms and lawyers and people connected to the church hierarchy who did not want those documents to come out."

CHRIS WALLACE SAYS KAMALA HARRIS 'DOESN'T DO ANY HARM' TO BIDEN'S CHANCES

In June 2019, the Associated Press published a report headlined, "Victims' question Kamala Harris' record on clergy abuse" in which survivors of clergy abuse and their attorneys claimed Harris was consistently silent on the Catholic Church’s abuse scandal — first as district attorney in San Francisco and later as California’s attorney general.

It’s interesting how she’s such a powerful VP candidate.
She receives so much attention.
Really invigorates the ticket...
 
Back
Top