2020...

As I have always said, Trump is a tragic aberration in the history of American politics.
It’s good he will be gone, but the stupidity and hatred he has exposed and capitalized on here are very distressing revelations.
 
At the very least Trump stopped Hillary from appointing 3 supremes and will have himself put close to 300 federal judges on the bench.
Very true.
Last week those Supremes protected LGBTQ rights in the workplace and DACA rights.
I think we will survive Trump’s temporary regime.
 
As I have always said, Trump is a tragic aberration in the history of American politics.
It’s good he will be gone, but the stupidity and hatred he has exposed and capitalized on here are very distressing revelations.
As I have always said, Hillary and his wife Bill are a tragic aberration in the history of American politics.
It’s good she is gone, but the stupidity and hatred she has exposed and capitalized on here is not surprising nor a revelation. #ZZJoe
 
Trump’s appointees.

The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Trump administration's attempt to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that protects hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the US as children from deportation.

1592926146343.png

USCIS Statement on Supreme Court’s DACA Decision

Release Date: June 19, 2020
WASHINGTON — U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Deputy Director for Policy Joseph Edlow issued the following statement on today’s Supreme Court decision on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program:
Today’s court opinion has no basis in law and merely delays the President’s lawful ability to end the illegal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty program.
“DACA was created through an Executive Branch memorandum after President Obama said repeatedly that it was illegal for him to do so unilaterally and despite the fact that Congress affirmatively rejected the proposal on multiple occasions. The constitutionality of this de facto amnesty program created by the Obama administration has been widely questioned since its inception. The fact remains that under DACA, hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens continue to remain in our country in violation of the laws passed by Congress and to take jobs Americans need now more than ever. Ultimately, DACA is not a long-term solution for anyone, and if Congress wants to provide a permanent solution for these illegal aliens it needs to step in to reform our immigration laws and prove that the cornerstone of our democracy is that presidents cannot legislate with a ‘pen and a phone.”
For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow them on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook (/uscis) and LinkedIn (/uscis).
 
View attachment 7847

USCIS Statement on Supreme Court’s DACA Decision

Release Date: June 19, 2020
WASHINGTON — U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Deputy Director for Policy Joseph Edlow issued the following statement on today’s Supreme Court decision on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program:
Today’s court opinion has no basis in law and merely delays the President’s lawful ability to end the illegal Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty program.
“DACA was created through an Executive Branch memorandum after President Obama said repeatedly that it was illegal for him to do so unilaterally and despite the fact that Congress affirmatively rejected the proposal on multiple occasions. The constitutionality of this de facto amnesty program created by the Obama administration has been widely questioned since its inception. The fact remains that under DACA, hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens continue to remain in our country in violation of the laws passed by Congress and to take jobs Americans need now more than ever. Ultimately, DACA is not a long-term solution for anyone, and if Congress wants to provide a permanent solution for these illegal aliens it needs to step in to reform our immigration laws and prove that the cornerstone of our democracy is that presidents cannot legislate with a ‘pen and a phone.”
For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow them on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), Facebook (/uscis) and LinkedIn (/uscis).
Supreme Court already ruled, but thanks for the note.
Maybe you aren’t aware that they have more authority than a bureaucrat writing a memo.
 
Supreme Court already ruled, but thanks for the note.
Maybe you aren’t aware that they have more authority than a bureaucrat writing a memo.
Yes the memo was written after the decision ass wipe...do you even know what the decision says? Obviously you don't.

from the NYTimes:
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration may not immediately proceed with its plan to end a program protecting about 700,000 young immigrants known as Dreamers from deportation....
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the majority opinion, joined by the court’s four more liberal members in upholding the executive action by President Barack Obama that established the program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. But the chief justice made clear that the decision was based on procedural issues and that the Trump administration could try to redress them.

The court’s decision was provisional, and it did not remove the uncertainty that young immigrants have lived with — including the possibility of being forcibly returned to countries many of them cannot even remember — since they arrived in the United States as children. The DACA program itself provided only a renewable two-year deferral of possible deportation, with no pathway to citizenship.
“Today’s decision allows Dreamers to breathe a temporary sigh of relief,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a law professor at Cornell.

Mr. Trump announced in September 2017 that he would wind down the program, basing his decision on the argument that creating or maintaining it was beyond the legal power of any president.

But the justification the government gave, Chief Justice Roberts wrote, was insufficient or, in legal terms, “arbitrary and capricious.” He said the administration may try again to provide adequate reasons.

“Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision,” Justice Thomas wrote. “The court could have made clear that the solution respondents seek must come from the legislative branch.”

“It has given the green light,” he wrote of the court, “for future political battles to be fought in this court rather than where they rightfully belong — the political branches.”

 
Yes the memo was written after the decision ass wipe...do you even know what the decision says? Obviously you don't.

from the NYTimes:
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration may not immediately proceed with its plan to end a program protecting about 700,000 young immigrants known as Dreamers from deportation....
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the majority opinion, joined by the court’s four more liberal members in upholding the executive action by President Barack Obama that established the program, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. But the chief justice made clear that the decision was based on procedural issues and that the Trump administration could try to redress them.

The court’s decision was provisional, and it did not remove the uncertainty that young immigrants have lived with — including the possibility of being forcibly returned to countries many of them cannot even remember — since they arrived in the United States as children. The DACA program itself provided only a renewable two-year deferral of possible deportation, with no pathway to citizenship.
“Today’s decision allows Dreamers to breathe a temporary sigh of relief,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a law professor at Cornell.

Mr. Trump announced in September 2017 that he would wind down the program, basing his decision on the argument that creating or maintaining it was beyond the legal power of any president.

But the justification the government gave, Chief Justice Roberts wrote, was insufficient or, in legal terms, “arbitrary and capricious.” He said the administration may try again to provide adequate reasons.

“Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision,” Justice Thomas wrote. “The court could have made clear that the solution respondents seek must come from the legislative branch.”

“It has given the green light,” he wrote of the court, “for future political battles to be fought in this court rather than where they rightfully belong — the political branches.”

DACA stands, dunbass.
The Supremes have spoken.
Cry all you want.
 
DACA stands, dunbass.
The Supremes have spoken.
Cry all you want.
Once again your arrogance and ignorance guide your posts...the Supremes have spoken and you have only an idea what was said.
The fact is Presidents can not through executive order make immigration policy.
A permanent solution needs to be in place so the daca children can stay in the country LEGALLY...
 
Once again your arrogance and ignorance guide your posts...the Supremes have spoken and you have only an idea what was said.
The fact is Presidents can not through executive order make immigration policy.
A permanent solution needs to be in place so the daca children can stay in the country LEGALLY...
So DACA stands, per last week’s decision.
You’re talking in circles, but please keep sending government memos and newspaper articles with their opinions about what the FACT of the decision means.
 
As I have always said, Trump is a tragic aberration in the history of American politics.
It’s good he will be gone, but the stupidity and hatred he has exposed and capitalized on here are very distressing revelations.


Oh ignorant one, what kind of Crystal " Balls " are you handling....
 
So DACA stands, per last week’s decision.
You’re talking in circles, but please keep sending government memos and newspaper articles with their opinions about what the FACT of the decision means.
Trump said they will go at it again.
Something about red tape.
 
Back
Top