2020...

tenacious said:
Events which Republican's investigated right?

Also aren't you just really making another "Obama said it was alright" arguments I've been pointing out? I.e. because Obama broke the rules advancing the countries goals, so everybody must by default agree that it's okay for Trump to break the rules to help his personal interests. That make me think... meh.
Click to expand...
No, just asking why you didn’t complain about it then.
 
The Outlaw said:
No... you must agree that liberals are hypocrites. If it wasn't a problem when Obama did it, it's not a problem now and libtards need to shut up.
Click to expand...

Huh? Again in a weird way you seem to be deeming on if Obama said it's okay or not.
Again, sure I'll agree Obama and the CIA got caught playing some real politick against our enemies, that franky going back to Regan and the Contras, every American knows our goverment plays. If you think this now means now all laws don't apply to Trump... I frankly disagree. Not only that but I get a chuckle out of the idea.

But at this point I think we both know where each other stand. Guess we won't know who voters agree with until Nov.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
No, just asking why you didn’t complain about it then.
Click to expand...

Why are we even talking about Obama? Trumps got a record... kind of funny that no one is running on that?
He went all in on the economy, and his one issue (I'll fairly admit) has been seemingly tanked.

Ya'll need to stop blaming and talking about solutions and why more of the same is going to be good for voters. Republican's have been in charge for a long time. There is massive unemployment, the stock market is down 30%+. Huffing and puffing about Obama, attacking mid-western Govenors who are in the middle of managing the pandemic, isn't going to win you Trump the midwest again. Just my two-cents.
 
Poconos said:
where is messy to correct your grammar? this can't stand!

joking aside, crony capitalism is more rampant on the left in the first place. but you are moving the goalposts of course. you equivocated chanting with a massive abuse of governmental power (3 branches to boot) in the name of smearing a POTUS that the dem's simply don't like because he has an "R" next to his name. you will recall nearly the same vitriol in full display when dubbya was POTUS. it really doesn't matter who the individual is, the hate is ceaseless and extreme. i suspect you are comfortable in that sort of environment.

the cat is out of the bag. your seats are flipping.
Click to expand...


Moving the goal posts? Show me where....
As for my grammar, well let me apologize in advance.
 
tenacious said:
Why are we even talking about Obama? Trumps got a record... kind of funny that no one is running on that?
He went all in on the economy, and his one issue (I'll fairly admit) has been seemingly tanked.

Ya'll need to stop blaming and talking about solutions and why more of the same is going to be good for voters. Republican's have been in charge for a long time. There is massive unemployment, the stock market is down 30%+. Huffing and puffing about Obama, attacking mid-western Govenors who are in the middle of managing the pandemic, isn't going to win you Trump the midwest again. Just my two-cents.
Click to expand...

*(I'll fairly admit because of The Corona)
 
tenacious said:
Why are we even talking about Obama? Trumps got a record... kind of funny that no one is running on that?
He went all in on the economy, and his one issue (I'll fairly admit) has been seemingly tanked.

Ya'll need to stop blaming and talking about solutions and why more of the same is going to be good for voters. Republican's have been in charge for a long time. There is massive unemployment, the stock market is down 30%+. Huffing and puffing about Obama, attacking mid-western Govenors who are in the middle of managing the pandemic, isn't going to win you Trump the midwest again. Just my two-cents.
Click to expand...
No answer.
Did you think Trump would win in 2016?
 
tenacious said:
Huh? Again in a weird way you seem to be deeming on if Obama said it's okay or not.
Again, sure I'll agree Obama and the CIA got caught playing some real politick against our enemies, that franky going back to Regan and the Contras, every American knows our goverment plays. If you think this now means now all laws don't apply to Trump... I frankly disagree. Not only that but I get a chuckle out of the idea.

But at this point I think we both know where each other stand. Guess we won't know who voters agree with until Nov.
Click to expand...

It goes back to Eisenhower at least, when he ignored the results of the Vietnamese elections that chose Ho Chi Minh as leader after the French were thrown out. And Kennedy and Johnson and Nixon made that worse (and Kennedy had his Cuba issues also).
 
tenacious said:
Truthfully I'm less concerned about the money wasted by the highly charged political atmosphere then the principle that America is a nation of laws. The president potentially using his office to arrest his political enemies is against our laws would be illegal. Therefore needed to be addressed imho.

That said, if you want to compare the cost of impeachments verse crony capitalism... I don't think our debate is going to end where you're thinking it will .
Click to expand...
Good point, and how much did "BENGHAZI!!!" cost us?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Good point, and how much did "BENGHAZI!!!" cost us?
Click to expand...

No......how much did it COST you Democrats.....

Looks like ..not only your reputation...but now your whole PARTY !

Enjoy the " Shit Fest " you have supported over the last 11 years...!

Because it's all coming to a screeching halt .......You're all CRIMINALS...!
 
tenacious said:
You did say dems had acted like upset girlfriends after Trump had lost. Pretty obvious you're saying we're not with the program to me...

In regard to the impeachment, my feeling was after he got caught blackmailing foreigners into trying to arrest his political enemies that an impeachment was justifiable. I understand the Senate acquitted him, but I thought a point had to be made. Obviously we are in a politically divisive time where Republicans chant lock her up and Democrats are impeaching the President... but that whole thing crossed the line to me.

As to half the country not liking Hillary, I would simply point out it's not much different then half the country not liking Trump. You and I can't be the only two who are tired of all this pettiness out of our leaders. Which is why I would encourage you to take another look at voting for Joe Biden. He's not talking about locking people up, any more then he's some crazy left-wing socialist. Biden's a hold out from a time when both parties acted like adults.
Click to expand...
Biden supporters are crazy people.

"I would vote for Joe Biden if he boiled babies and ate them. He wasn’t my candidate, but taking back the White House is that important."
 
Torros said:
Biden supporters are crazy people.

"I would vote for Joe Biden if he boiled babies and ate them. He wasn’t my candidate, but taking back the White House is that important."
Click to expand...


Who said that.....?

Couldn't be Hillary Rotten Clinton now could it ....?

From:hit-reply@linkedin.com
To:
john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2016-01-19 18:17

Subject: Hillary Clinton - Inquiry

Hillary Clinton - Inquiry Dear Ms. Alcantara<br> <br>

I am the Editor in Chief of Thought Economics (http://www.thoughteconomics.com) - a journal now read in over 120 countries.
I am working on a major piece looking at gender equality, and the rights of women & girls, and it would be a real honour to
interview Hillary Clinton.<br> <br>
The other interviewees for the piece are<br> Layman Gbowee (Nobel Peace Prize Winner)<br>
Dubravka Simonovic (UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women)<br>
Cheryl WuDunn (Half the Sky)<br> Leslee Udwin (India’s Daughter).<br> <br>
The interview would take no more than around 20 minutes of her time on the phone, or
can be done via email too as she would prefer.
Happy to compare dates through February or March. <br> <br>
Thought Economics was founded by me in 2007, and has been recognised globally for the quality
of our editorial content, having been named as an Official Honoree at the 2012, 2013 and 2015 Webby
Awards (run by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences) for Best Writing (Editorial) alongside
the New York Times, the BBC, The Paris Review, Vanity Fair, The Financial Times and National Geographic. <br> <br>
By way of reference, some of my interviews with many of the world's most prominent leaders and thinkers
include: Buzz Aldrin (Lunar Astronaut), Sir Richard Branson (Founder, Virgin Group), Dr. Jane Goodall, DBE
(Founder of the Jane Goodall Institute and UN Messenger of Peace), Nobel Laureates
(including President F. W. de Klerk, President Maarti Ahtisaari,
Prof. Jody Williams, Dr. Shirin Ebadi, Prof Michael Spence,
Prof. Edmund Phelps, Prof. Daniel Kahneman),
Vint Cerf (Co-Founder of the Internet),
Admiral James Stavridis (Former Supreme Allied Commmander, NATO),
Moises Naim (Global Intellectual),
Celso Amorim (Minister of Defence, Brazil),
Maya Angelou (Freedom Fighter and Writer),
Sir Ratan Tata (Chairman, TATA Group),
Jimmy Wales (Founder, Wikipedia),
Moby, Hans Zimmer, Marina Abramovic,
H.E Anote Tong (President of the Republic of Kiribati).<br> <br> Yours,<br> <br>
Vikas Shah<br>
Go here to reply: https://www.linkedin.com/e/v2?e=71g...095307795563900928_500&itemAction=inmailReply
Go here if not interested: https://www.linkedin.com/e/v2?e=71g...095307795563900928_500&itemAction=inmailReply
 
messy said:
Whoa. Did you see that? His handler informed the newscaster that “this will be our last question.” Which handlers of all celebrities and politicians have told interviewers for about 100 years.
But Red State can really break a story.
Click to expand...

yes, but those other celebrities and politicians didn't need their diapers changed
 
Poconos said:
yes, but those other celebrities and politicians didn't need their diapers changed
Click to expand...
Good one, jackoff.
Here’s the good news for you. You are just as angry and wrong, but you aren’t quite as hopelessly dumb as Outlaw and MSK, so they remain the winners.
You could reach their status soon, though, asshole.
 
messy said:
Good one, jackoff.
Here’s the good news for you. You are just as angry and wrong, but you aren’t quite as hopelessly dumb as Outlaw and MSK, so they remain the winners.
You could reach their status soon, though, asshole.
Click to expand...

Awe, you getting hurt, jock sniffer? You miss your precious Lionel? Will he be there to comfort you when Pap Smear Joe begins frothing at the mouth on his podium? Wait... does he get a podium if he's only running for the senate on Super Thursday?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top