2020...

messy said:
Because you're a Trumpie, you are incapable of moral distinctions. Therefore, we should view Putin the same as we view ourselves. Again, I get it.

It serves you and your Orange Master to stick up for his master. As Pelosi recently said to him, "All roads with you lead to Putin, don't they?"

So you're just doing your job, dimwit.

The below quote is from your article...

"But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed
at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said."
Click to expand...

Really? Moral distinctions. So you're saying it's okay if we do it but "Bad Vladimir" if they do it, right? That actually makes sense, jock sniffer. You liberals do love your hypocrisy, don't you? Steven Hall... CNN analyst. Loch K. Johnson... advisor to Democrats Carter and Senator Church. So, dimwit, if you're going to do some homework... do ALL your homework.


Loch K. Johnson, Ph.D.

alumni.uga.edu alumni.uga.edu
 
espola said:
So far, the answer you have given to the question "what is t doing about Russian interference in our elections?" can be summarized as "Nothiing". I find that hard to be true. I am sure you will provide some facts to clear up the apparent misunderstanding.
Click to expand...

President Trump is busy fighting off our nation's 2 biggest enemies... the libtard media and the libtard politicians. But to answer your "Nothiing" summary, yet another link to prove your dumbass wrong.

www.reuters.com

Trump signs order to enable sanctions for U.S. election meddling

Under fire over his handling of Russian election meddling, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday meant to strengthen election security by slapping sanctions on foreign countries or people who try to interfere in the U.S. political process.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
 
messy said:
Because you're a Trumpie, you are incapable of moral distinctions. Therefore, we should view Putin the same as we view ourselves. Again, I get it.

It serves you and your Orange Master to stick up for his master. As Pelosi recently said to him, "All roads with you lead to Putin, don't they?"

So you're just doing your job, dimwit.

The below quote is from your article...

"But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said."
Click to expand...
We made a complete mess of Central and South America, and now pay the price in many ways. But saying because we have that history we should sit back and watch it happen to us is ludicrous. Only an anti-American trumpist would attempt to use that as an excuse for a lack of action.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
We made a complete mess of Central and South America, and now pay the price in many ways. But saying because we have that history we should sit back and watch it happen to us is ludicrous. Only an anti-American trumpist would attempt to use that as an excuse for a lack of action.
Click to expand...


You are reciting UNION gibberish......

Try to compose a worthwhile paragraph on your own once in a while...
 
The Outlaw said:
Really? Moral distinctions. So you're saying it's okay if we do it but "Bad Vladimir" if they do it, right? That actually makes sense, jock sniffer. You liberals do love your hypocrisy, don't you? Steven Hall... CNN analyst. Loch K. Johnson... advisor to Democrats Carter and Senator Church. So, dimwit, if you're going to do some homework... do ALL your homework.


Loch K. Johnson, Ph.D.

alumni.uga.edu alumni.uga.edu
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you got so emotional when citing Hall and Johnson's impressive cv's, that you failed to read what they said about the moral distinction.

Dumbshit.

Here it is again. They are making the moral distinctions. Learn how to read if you want to debate someone smart.

"But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said."
 
The Outlaw said:
President Trump is busy fighting off our nation's 2 biggest enemies... the libtard media and the libtard politicians. But to answer your "Nothiing" summary, yet another link to prove your dumbass wrong.

www.reuters.com

Trump signs order to enable sanctions for U.S. election meddling

Under fire over his handling of Russian election meddling, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday meant to strengthen election security by slapping sanctions on foreign countries or people who try to interfere in the U.S. political process.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
Click to expand...

He signed laws passed by veto-proof votes in Congress that gives him the power to impose sanctions. Who has he sanctioned?

An interesting note -- the article includes

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that entities backed by the Kremlin sought to boost Republican Trump’s chances of winning the White House in the 2016 election against his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. But Trump in July publicly accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denials at a joint press conference after they met for a summit in Helsinki.
 
messy said:
I'm sorry you got so emotional when citing Hall and Johnson's impressive cv's, that you failed to read what they said about the moral distinction.

Dumbshit.

Here it is again. They are making the moral distinctions. Learn how to read if you want to debate someone smart.

"But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said."
Click to expand...

I know what they said because I read it. I'm sorry you shit the bed because you didn't research their backgrounds to know they're both hardcore libtards.
 
espola said:
He signed laws passed by veto-proof votes in Congress that gives him the power to impose sanctions. Who has he sanctioned?

An interesting note -- the article includes

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that entities backed by the Kremlin sought to boost Republican Trump’s chances of winning the White House in the 2016 election against his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. But Trump in July publicly accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denials at a joint press conference after they met for a summit in Helsinki.
Click to expand...

You'd have to ask him who he's sanctioned. Maybe other countries have backed off because he's not a bowing pussy like Obama.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top