2020...

QUOTE="Imtired, post: 322837, member: 5643"
I asked if you would be ok with a frat boy grabbing your daughter’s “tit” at a party,
I said I wouldn’t be. You never answered but responded with a question to me
that was based on a false premise, so unanswerable.

As for Joe “hiding”, here ya’ go:

/QUOTE


Once again ....another poster bringing offspring/children into a post
where it has no place what so ever !!!!!

What a dick....
 
messy said:
Trump didn't get enough credit for his goal of a national infrastructure rehabilitation program. That would have been huge. McConnell told him no go on day 1 and instead of fighting, the bully folded immediately. Everything else he has done has been mean-spirited and ugly and childish and authoritarian. Lyin' Ted, Little Marco, Pocahontas...making fun of a handicapped journalist. That's the person you want as president? The absolute worst thing for our children. And I told my wife "if he gets elected, it may come down to which side the military takes when it's time for him to leave..." and everything he has done since validates my viewpoint.
Click to expand...

No, I'd rather have someone more politically correct because it would possibly shut the liberal party up for awhile... but I don't want Fauxahontas for President, either. I don't want Biden or Bernie, either. I don't want a mayor that can't handle a city like South Bend, who is popular because he's gay and speaks well publicly, anymore than I wanted a woman that chose to be a doormat rather than leave her husband. But when it comes to policy, I like all or most of what Trump has done.

As for him being "authoritarian", I want you to ask yourself a question. What would you like him to be? Because when he was "authoritarian" and being a leader of the country, you guys called him a "dictator". When he put most of the power in the hands of the governors, you guys said he "wasn't a leader and wanted to avoid culpability". That's what I call a no win situation and that's what Trump haters have done for 3-1/2 years.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
By "libtard" you mean fact based, cross referenced and researched as opposed to the geared to elict an emotional response tabloid 'journalism' you prefer?
Click to expand...

Fact checked by whom? Who checks CNN's facts? Certainly not CNN. This will be hard for your little libtard heart to accept, but CNN is no less one sided than any network on television.
 
Imtired said:
From what I read in the article, AP didn’t report on it because they couldn’t corroborate her story. That’s what news outlets have to do otherwise they could get sued for slander.

The Right says Democrats have a double-standard when it comes to how the react to sexual abuse accusations in their own party, but what about Al Franken, Anthony Weiner, and John Edwards?? If anything the left will fall all over themselves to prove they are “better than the other guys” even if it means eating one of there own. On some level you have to admire the Right’s party loyalty no matter what. The GOP circle their wagons, the Left forms a circular firing squad.
Click to expand...

So why did they report on Peabody Ballsy Ford when NOBODY could corroborate her story?
 
The Outlaw said:
No, I'd rather have someone more politically correct because it would possibly shut the liberal party up for awhile... but I don't want Fauxahontas for President, either. I don't want Biden or Bernie, either. I don't want a mayor that can't handle a city like South Bend, who is popular because he's gay and speaks well publicly, anymore than I wanted a woman that chose to be a doormat rather than leave her husband. But when it comes to policy, I like all or most of what Trump has done.

As for him being "authoritarian", I want you to ask yourself a question. What would you like him to be? Because when he was "authoritarian" and being a leader of the country, you guys called him a "dictator". When he put most of the power in the hands of the governors, you guys said he "wasn't a leader and wanted to avoid culpability". That's what I call a no win situation and that's what Trump haters have done for 3-1/2 years.
Click to expand...
Trump has only undone things. He hasn't "done" anything. He has told us that all of our international relations, environmental regulations, social programs, etc. are bad and should be cancelled. He has told us to "unbelieve" everything we hear. He has taken the lead in undoing.
When he needed a vision to prepare for this virus and do something and show leadership, he said "it's nothing, it will disappear." Then he punted.
So we have been about the worst country in the world on this. "We are at war," he said later on. So the states should defend themselves. He's terrible.
 
messy said:
Trump has only undone things. He hasn't "done" anything. He has told us that all of our international relations, environmental regulations, social programs, etc. are bad and should be cancelled. He has told us to "unbelieve" everything we hear. He has taken the lead in undoing.
When he needed a vision to prepare for this virus and do something and show leadership, he said "it's nothing, it will disappear." Then he punted.
So we have been about the worst country in the world on this. "We are at war," he said later on. So the states should defend themselves. He's terrible.
Click to expand...

You're 100% wrong. He undid a horrible climate accord deal, he undid a horrible WHO deal, he undid a NAFTA agreement that didn't suit us and he has attempted to undo a horrible border situation, North Korea problem, etc. Many things needed to be undone and REDONE. Like keeping military personnel in lifelong wars. Tried to "undone" that, too, and you liberals just complained.
 
The Outlaw said:
You're 100% wrong. He undid a horrible climate accord deal, he undid a horrible WHO deal, he undid a NAFTA agreement that didn't suit us and he has attempted to undo a horrible border situation, North Korea problem, etc. Many things needed to be undone and REDONE. Like keeping military personnel in lifelong wars. Tried to "undone" that, too, and you liberals just complained.
Click to expand...
Hey, we agree on the facts! Good job! That's a start.
 
espola said:
At least he's not Donald.
Click to expand...
What a great comeback. I never would have thought of that one, really. The problem is " Donald" is more articulate the Joe, smarter then Joe and because he was the best the Democrats can do you will have to deal with "Donald" for a second term. Sucks for you and Rat Patrol.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Reminds me of another "lawmaker" who pontificated about islands tipping over.
Click to expand...
I don't know, I think this one still tops the list:

Todd Akin, a member of the House of Representatives and recently appointed Senate nominee for Missouri, made the claim during an interview in which he attempted to explain his no-exceptions policy in regards to abortion.

In reference to pregnancy resulting from rape, Akin told KTVI-TV: "First of all, from what I understand from doctors, that is really rare.

"If it is a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try and shut that whole thing down."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top