2020...

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Great group. They speak to the concerns of the everyday American. None of them worth less than $100m.

Are they any worse than Nancy Bacardi's nephew Gavin? He's wealthy, fucked his best friend's wife and spent today's news conference talking about his framework plan to re-open California.

 

[espola]

Why? Is it any less important than all the other sexual assaults he's been accused of? Turn off CNN and try google. You'll be amazed at how many news agencies are tracking this sexual predator.

Links?

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Kinda feels like you're cracking a bit. Ricky too. Don't worry, it'll be ok.

The good news is that you're feeling something other than Biden's hand around your waste or Gavin Newsom in your wallet.

 

[espola]

Oh, I don't fault Demotards for trying to keep Trump to a single term. That's what both parties try to do. But Obama never received the type of personal attacks for 3+ years like Trump has. You morons still think Russia is trying to help him win. Do you read the daily bullshit from your Huffington Posts... CNNs... yahoos... MSNBCs... etc? Talk about TRYING TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION! They don't offer news anymore; everything is a fucking opinion piece. Disgraceful. And let's be honest... when the best you can offer is Biden and Sanders, you deserve to get your asses handed to you.

Coocoo.

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Links?

Oh for fuck's sake! I'm so tired of posting links to shit for you and you just ignoring them. Do I have your word you'll at least read them?

 

[espola]

Are they any worse than Nancy Bacardi's nephew Gavin? He's wealthy, fucked his best friend's wife and spent today's news conference talking about his framework plan to re-open California.

Did you intend that to mean something?

 

[espola]

Oh for fuck's sake! I'm so tired of posting links to shit for you and you just ignoring them. Do I have your word you'll at least read them?

Have you not noticed the many times that I have pointed out problems with the articles you cite? Or their authors? Do you think I do that without reading them?

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Did you intend that to mean something?

Just your hypocrisy. Then again, I'm not sure liberals know the definition of the word. They think it's a song The Beatles did in the 60's.

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Have you not noticed the many times that I have pointed out problems with the articles you cite? Or their authors? Do you think I do that without reading them?

Considering you use "Wikipedia" as a source for all your drivel, there is ZERO problems with any of my posts. But since I like to entertain the intellectually challenged, here's the first one that popped up.

All the Women Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden

A running list.

www.thecut.com

 

[espola]

Considering you use "Wikipedia" as a source for all your drivel

No, I don't.

, there is ZERO problems with any of my posts.

Nice try, but no one believes that.

But since I like to entertain the intellectually challenged, here's the first one that popped up.

All the Women Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden

A running list.

www.thecut.com

Now that wasn't so hard, was it?

I noticed that a lot of those women were complaining about "violation of personal space" and things like that - things that are usually of concern to soft-hearted libtards (don't you agree?). Are you showing your true nature now?

I'm still spinning my wheels on your accusation of "hypocrisy" a few posts above - maybe you can help me out there.

 

[espola]

Considering you use "Wikipedia" as a source for all your drivel, there is ZERO problems with any of my posts. But since I like to entertain the intellectually challenged, here's the first one that popped up.

All the Women Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden

A running list.

www.thecut.com

Here's another contemporary article from The Cut (not found with any help from Wikipedia, if that matters)

The Absolute Best Highlighters for Looking Less Tired

After rigorous testing, here are our favorites.

www.thecut.com

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

No, I don't.



Nice try, but no one believes that.



Now that wasn't so hard, was it?

I noticed that a lot of those women were complaining about "violation of personal space" and things like that - things that are usually of concern to soft-hearted libtards (don't you agree?). Are you showing your true nature now?

I'm still spinning my wheels on your accusation of "hypocrisy" a few posts above - maybe you can help me out there.

Yes... Hypocrisy. Bagging on a list of wealthy Republicans talking about opening things back up. Doing the exact same thing your wealthy, libtard Governor talked about doing today. The only difference is that those Republicans didn't fuck their best friend's wife and ruin their marriage. Does that slow your spinning down now?

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Here's another contemporary article from The Cut (not found with any help from Wikipedia, if that matters)

The Absolute Best Highlighters for Looking Less Tired

After rigorous testing, here are our favorites.

www.thecut.com

And? Do you see Rolling Stone, GQ and Esquire contributing hit pieces on Trump or are you wearing your horsey blinders again?

Here's another. You want more?

All the Women Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden

A running list.

nymag.com

 

[Hüsker Dü]

I don't remember anyone trying to impeach Obama for doing something a Vice President did a year before, do you? Maybe libtards could have a Hannity or Limbaugh of their own if that many mongoloids could afford a radio.

Limbaugh and Co. know their audience and they know the rest of see through it.

 

[Hüsker Dü]

"We are your overlords, praise us or feel our wrath!"

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

Limbaugh and Co. know their audience and they know the rest of see through it.

See through what? The fact that both are multimillionaires because of their fan base? Hmm... can you see through Trump, too? Because he's about to win a 2nd term and it won't even be close, Husky.

 

[Lion Eyes]

Have you not noticed the many times that I have pointed out problems with the articles you cite? Or their authors? Do you think I do that without reading them?

You question any article, statistics, graphs or facts that you disagree with.
You take umbrage with stats posted by the CDC then use the same stats to try to make a point.
Reading and comprehension are not the same. Just ask your boy ratman.
Please wash you hands and remain isolated...

 

[The Outlaw *BANNED*]

"We are your overlords, praise us or feel our wrath!"
View attachment 6813

Reminds me of Bath House Barry forcing a healthcare plan down our throats without following proper procedure.

 

[Lion Eyes]

"We are your overlords, praise us or feel our wrath!"

Bless your little heart.

 

[espola]

And? Do you see Rolling Stone, GQ and Esquire contributing hit pieces on Trump or are you wearing your horsey blinders again?

Here's another. You want more?

All the Women Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden

A running list.

nymag.com

Did you know that The Cut and Intelligencer are both parts of the New York Magazine web machine? So that's essentially the same article, with at least one shared author.

There's a legitimate argument in place that you don't read the articles that you accuse me of not reading.