Cal outclassed tonight. Is Cal that bad or Santa Clara that good?
Both
Cal outclassed tonight. Is Cal that bad or Santa Clara that good?
I was really surprised by Cal's play. They weren't first to any balls and were getting torched on the flanks over and over. They looked slow and unskilled. Agreed Santa Clara looked great. Would the addition of Kim and Nild make up the 4 goal difference? Not sure when the defense couldn't hang... nor could the midfield.Cal outclassed tonight. Is Cal that bad or Santa Clara that good?
I am confused. Cal's website shows a win against Santa Clare 2-1 on Sunday, 8/20.Santa Clara is legit. Up 4-0 on Cal with 30 to play. Cal not playing Abi Kim and Miranda Nild
That was last yearI am confused. Cal's website shows a win against Santa Clare 2-1 on Sunday, 8/20.
https://calbears.com/schedule.aspx?schedule=532
Agreed. And to add, how in the heck do you allow 1 goal by header, let alone 4??? Cal defenders just stood there and watched the ball get sent into the box as Santa Clara players just walked in, untouched, unadulterated and perfectly placed their head on each ball. No physicality whatsoever; not a jump to contest the header, a bump of a Santa Clara player, a post up or blocking move to prevent the Santa Clara player from getting a clean look at the ball. Lame.I was really surprised by Cal's play. They weren't first to any balls and were getting torched on the flanks over and over. They looked slow and unskilled. Agreed Santa Clara looked great. Would the addition of Kim and Nild make up the 4 goal difference? Not sure when the defense couldn't hang... nor could the midfield.
Well, if you don't like the result, just use last years. Top Drawer Soccer probably won't notice and then Cal will get ranked in the top 25.That was last year
Totally. Each goal was scored in the exact same way. No pressure on the player serving the ball and nobody marking far post.... 4 times! That's a head scratcher. They clearly weren't ready to play and got boat raced. Then they proceeded to collect yellow cards like they were being dealt a poker hand. I honestly thought they had more quality, more ahleticsm and speed (which Kim and Nild would provide if they played). However, if they play like this in the PAC 12, it will be a long losing season.Agreed. And to add, how in the heck do you allow 1 goal by header, let alone 4??? Cal defenders just stood there and watched the ball get sent into the box as Santa Clara players just walked in, untouched, unadulterated and perfectly placed their head on each ball. No physicality whatsoever; not a jump to contest the header, a bump of a Santa Clara player, a post up or blocking move to prevent the Santa Clara player from getting a clean look at the ball. Lame.
Nothing's been mentioned publicly. But my understanding is there were 8 players out with injury or illness for the Davis game. So I'm hopeful it was only a minor/temporary health issue. Too bad Ratcliff got away without discussing Macario's situation at all. No way a Heisman Trophy candidate could miss a season opener without some discussion of it.What’s up with Macario?
Nothing's been mentioned publicly. But my understanding is there were 8 players out with injury or illness for the Davis game. So I'm hopeful it was only a minor/temporary health issue. Too bad Ratcliff got away without discussing Macario's situation at all. No way a Heisman Trophy candidate could miss a season opener without some discussion of it.
Jeez...what are they doing in training that 8 players miss the opener. I can see a rolled ankle or two but this wreaks of UNC a few years back with multiple ACLs in trainingNothing's been mentioned publicly. But my understanding is there were 8 players out with injury or illness for the Davis game. So I'm hopeful it was only a minor/temporary health issue. Too bad Ratcliff got away without discussing Macario's situation at all. No way a Heisman Trophy candidate could miss a season opener without some discussion of it.
AT@T owns Direct Tv.....AT@T is a major sponsor of Pac12. They still can’t get it done. MoronsI think someone said it earlier on this thread. The pac 12 network would do themselves wonders if they could actually figure out a contract with direct tv.
I think someone said it earlier on this thread. The pac 12 network would do themselves wonders if they could actually figure out a contract with direct tv.
You are asking way too much there.And get some decent announcers and referees!!
This wasn't a typo. I was commenting on the difference between how Mac Hermann candidates are treated vs Heisman candidates. A coach of a Heisman candidate would never get away with failing to address the player's absence, while the coach of our Mac Hermann candidate just did.She plays for Stanford’s Football team now? She would be the first female Heisman candidate. Bryce Love is going to get more carries IMHO though and might split the west coast vote.
AT@T owns Direct Tv.....AT@T is a major sponsor of Pac12. They still can’t get it done. Morons
This wasn't a typo. I was commenting on the difference between how Mac Hermann candidates are treated vs Heisman candidates. A coach of a Heisman candidate would never get away with failing to address the player's absence, while the coach of our Mac Hermann candidate just did.
Disclaimer, I have DirectTV and have been fairly happy with it. Having said that, the management at DirectTV have been hard to work with since before the satellites even launched.AT@T owns Direct Tv.....AT@T is a major sponsor of Pac12. They still can’t get it done. Morons