Sheriff Joe
DA
Parlays always hit when you don't have money on them.You would have won a few bucks on a parlay card in Vegas.
Parlays always hit when you don't have money on them.You would have won a few bucks on a parlay card in Vegas.
Stanford is one of the few teams who can match up position by position with UCLA.Had the pleasure of watching the Stanford game yesterday. Stanford completely dominated a solid Wisconsin team. They are stacked at every position! IMO Wisconsin has only one game changer . . . their center mid . . . but Stanford has a bunch of them. Final score was 5-0, but it should have been 8-0.
The ones in purple I got right...although I still don't know the results of UCR and Idaho.
#Cal Poly vs. SIU Edwardsville
Cal St. Northridge vs. Pacific
California vs. (23) Santa Clara
Colorado vs. Colorado Col.
(12) Duke vs. Xavier
Fresno St. vs. Cal St. Fullerton
Long Beach St. vs. (8) UCLA
Michigan vs. Idaho St.
Michigan St. vs. Washington
North Texas vs. (17) Arkansas
Oregon vs. Kansas State
Penn St. vs. Hofstra
#Pepperdine vs. Virginia Tech (made no call on this one)
Portland vs. North Carolina St.
San Diego vs. Texas A&M
San Diego St. vs. UC Davis
#San Francisco vs. Texas Tech
San Jose St. vs. UC Santa Barbara
Seattle vs. Oregon St. (still playing as of this post)
St. Mary's (Cal.) vs. Fordham
UC Riverside vs. Idaho
(19) Utah vs. South Dakota St.
#Wisconsin vs. (2) Stanford
OK, so it was an easy day of picks, but That's enough calls to start a bookkeeping operation, right?![]()
Stanford is one of the few teams who can match up position by position with UCLA.
Stanford is one of the few teams who can match up position by position with UCLA.
New Poll out including votes. How the heck is $C still ranked in the top 5? Were they even watching any games?
http://www.ncaa.com/rankings/soccer-women/d1/united-soccer-coaches
New Poll out including votes. How the heck is $C still ranked in the top 5? Were they even watching any games?
http://www.ncaa.com/rankings/soccer-women/d1/united-soccer-coaches
The other "USC" at #3 is probably a bigger joke.
One might think they are just trying to get under your skin. My wife and my 12yr old watched both SC and UCLA play CSULB and could not stop talking about how much better UCLA was. Not trying to butter up to anyone, just passing along a little friendly feedback.
Still have SC over UCLA when they start slinging the pigskin, but that's about it.
No joke, #17 in gold is an athlete. She's the type of player that you know can ball just by her posture & walk. Sprinkle in a little bit of dazzle in front of the box to create space....dish out...run back for the thru pass. An athlete + field IQ = Dangerous.
That is completely laughable. The Southeast bias is evident. 3 of the last 6 national champions were from California....
I like her, but not that much, finishing skills need more refinement in my opinion, but has speed to kill. Kind of the opposite of Maria Sanchez for Santa Clara, excellent skills, but no explosive speed.
And while I'm at it, that game shoulda been a 1-0 win for Cal (on the pk). Both teams had the GK let a ball through that was literally 1 foot to the left of each GK. Both dove and the ball went through before they could get low enough to block the ball.
Those balls never get through an 8 year old softball/baseball player! Take an infielders stance, hands low, and simple slide step or shuffle step to the left. This is a very easy ground ball in baseball or softball. You'll never see a baseball player dive for a ball so close. How many times have we seen a GK dive for a close ball and have the ball bounce off the GK's feet or stomach to create a 2nd chance. The trainer who started this trend (dive for everything), never played other sports. It is so ingrained in the training that you see GK's diving when the ball is clearly 20 feet wide left or right. Just gotta laugh at that.
One might think they are just trying to get under your skin. My wife and my 12yr old watched both SC and UCLA play CSULB and could not stop talking about how much better UCLA was.