2016-17 D1 Women's soccer thread!!!

CaliKlines said:
Gentlemen, let me break the news to you...there is a big, wide, wonderful world beyond the San Diego county line! Molson Canadian is packaged in a brown bottle, unlike Molson Golden, which is in a green bottle and does have a decidedly skunk flavor. Molson Canadian was created 57 years ago. Lets see how many of these SD microbreweries are still around 57 years from now! However, I will not disparage their product though...I have had some mighty delicious Legacy, Stone, and Ballast Point offerings. Just not quite as good as Canadian.
Click to expand...
Fair enough. Just yanking your chain. But along the lines of what Michael Jackson used to say (the beer hunter, not the gloved one), "If you see a beer, do it a favor and drink it." Beer is better fresh and usually does not travel well, especially the lighter beers like pilsners. For instance, Pilsner Urquell purchased in Europe in 1 liter bottles with freshness dates showing it was bottled two weeks ago tastes so much better than Pilsner Urquell here in the states. Then again, Pilsner Urquell is now part of SABMiller and Molson became Molson Coors. Who knows if the recipes are the same as back in the day? Now that the bean counters are in charge, I tend to stick to local, independent micros.
 
gkrent said:
^^^^outside! is the MAP of beer
Click to expand...

Okay if that is supposed to be an insult it isn't. If outside feels that beer should be good like I think that soccer should be then okay. No biggie. Like the avatar says haters gonna hate. As long as my player is doing well then I really don't care. I'm sure many who post on this forum would like their player's experience to mirror my players experience just like many would beers would like to mirror San Diego's finest (although Russian River has plenty with Pliny the Elder and Pliny the Younger).
 
MakeAPlay said:
Okay if that is supposed to be an insult it isn't. If outside feels that beer should be good like I think that soccer should be then okay. No biggie. Like the avatar says haters gonna hate. As long as my player is doing well then I really don't care. I'm sure many who post on this forum would like their player's experience to mirror my players experience just like many would beers would like to mirror San Diego's finest (although Russian River has plenty with Pliny the Elder and Pliny the Younger).
Click to expand...
MAP may be the MAP of soccer and beer...
 
CaliKlines said:
BS, no hunting necessary. Cold beer on draft and a Privateer pizza sounds like high enough stakes for me. Besides, the Wolfpack has to win a second game in the tournament. Definitely a big hurdle.
Click to expand...
You got it.
Beer and pizza to the victor.
Dont play the lowly east coast underdog card.
I saw how fired up the Wolfpack was when they advanced.
Its gonna be a battle.
 
MakeAPlay said:
Okay if that is supposed to be an insult it isn't. If outside feels that beer should be good like I think that soccer should be then okay. No biggie. Like the avatar says haters gonna hate. As long as my player is doing well then I really don't care. I'm sure many who post on this forum would like their player's experience to mirror my players experience just like many would beers would like to mirror San Diego's finest (although Russian River has plenty with Pliny the Elder and Pliny the Younger).
Click to expand...

Not an insult. Well done understanding my point. Sorry you thought it was negative.
 
Interesting numbers from the tournament.

Conference record W-L-T (a win or a loss in PK's)

ACC 6-0-2
Big Ten 5-0-3
Big 12 3-3
Pac 12 5-0-1
SEC 5-1-0
WCC 2-0-1
Big East 1-1-0
All Others 0-22-3

It's looking like the Pac 12, ACC and WCC did the best in the first round. These next two rounds will tell the story. Not much of an argument against the Power 5 conferences gobbling up the at large bids. All 3 of the Big 12's losses were at the hand of other Power 5 conference teams as was the one loss by the SEC. Every loss by a Power 5 team came at the hands of another Poser 5 team or in PK's. Very interesting.
 
MakeAPlay said:
Interesting numbers from the tournament.

Conference record W-L-T (a win or a loss in PK's)

ACC 6-0-2
Big Ten 5-0-3
Big 12 3-3
Pac 12 5-0-1
SEC 5-1-0
WCC 2-0-1
Big East 1-1-0
All Others 0-22-3

It's looking like the Pac 12, ACC and WCC did the best in the first round. These next two rounds will tell the story. Not much of an argument against the Power 5 conferences gobbling up the at large bids. All 3 of the Big 12's losses were at the hand of other Power 5 conference teams as was the one loss by the SEC. Every loss by a Power 5 team came at the hands of another Poser 5 team or in PK's. Very interesting.
Click to expand...

Correction Big Ten went 6-0-2
 
MakeAPlay said:
Interesting numbers from the tournament.

Conference record W-L-T (a win or a loss in PK's)

ACC 6-0-2
Big Ten 5-0-3
Big 12 3-3
Pac 12 5-0-1
SEC 5-1-0
WCC 2-0-1
Big East 1-1-0
All Others 0-22-3

It's looking like the Pac 12, ACC and WCC did the best in the first round. These next two rounds will tell the story. Not much of an argument against the Power 5 conferences gobbling up the at large bids. All 3 of the Big 12's losses were at the hand of other Power 5 conference teams as was the one loss by the SEC. Every loss by a Power 5 team came at the hands of another Poser 5 team or in PK's. Very interesting.
Click to expand...
Not a bad analysis, but I would keep it simple and just go with wins and losses, as there are no ties in the post season.
 
Bernie Sanders said:
Not a bad analysis, but I would keep it simple and just go with wins and losses, as there are no ties in the post season.
Click to expand...

All NCAA tournament games that go to kicks from the mark to select which team advances are considered to be ties for both teams, except for the final game, in which a winner and loser are designated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top