2016-17 D1 Women's soccer thread!!!

Dang..... Lot of anger there deputy D. Don't let online personas trigger roid rage/cop inferiority complex (never good for public safety)

Perhaps ya need to take a few days off. A little road trip to the neighborly green friendly states and & chillax.✌

Hankuna Matata.:cool:
 
Zerodenero said:
Dang..... Lot of anger there deputy D. Don't let online personas trigger roid rage/cop inferiority complex (never good for public safety)

Perhaps ya need to take a few days off. A little road trip to the neighborly green friendly states and & chillax.✌

Hankuna Matata.:cool:
Click to expand...
Maybe your right, I am a little uptight after losing my election. Why would someone attack me so early in the morning about an issue between me and the seahag? None of Cals business. I did not start this. I was planning on a road tip up north to watch Cal in the tourney but they didn't make it out of the first round, maybe that is why Cal is in a foul mood.
Map and Cal, losers, misery loves company.
 
Legendary FC said:
You talk a big game for someone who's kid would be lucky to play at the level that MAP's kid plays at. You're like the armchair quarterback that never made it off the JV squad. You need to pick a better target for your angst because you are swinging out of your weight class.
Click to expand...

Thanks but I don't need any defending. The ignore feature is awesome.
 
Swoosh said:
Every team will possess at some point in a 90 minute game, but since overall they hardly had the ball and were thoroughly out-possessed, even by admission of their coach and by how he approached the game, are you saying their style is to have a goalkeeper that's "game"? 14 shots on goal is an enormous amount in our game. If the game was played 10 times I wouldn't expect the same result.
Click to expand...

What I am saying is they look to possess the ball. Not many teams are going to outpossess Stanford based upon the players that they have. When Santa Clara had the ball they weren't simply booting it forward. Of course Stanford would when the majority of the time if the game were replayed. It was an upset. You can't have it both ways Swoosh. Talk shit because it was an upset and then argue that Stanford was the better team. Duh of course they were. The only other team to get the better of them was super physical and played pretty direct.
 
Swoosh said:
Certainly that team would classify as a possession team that maybe needs to find better players for the final third.
Click to expand...

You are kidding yourself right? Sometimes teams bunker and it is hard to connect the final pass. You act like that is friggin news to you. Don't worry about Santa Clara they have some horses coming and I expect them to be a top 15 team for the next few years.
 
MakeAPlay said:
What I am saying is they look to possess the ball. Not many teams are going to outpossess Stanford based upon the players that they have. When Santa Clara had the ball they weren't simply booting it forward. Of course Stanford would when the majority of the time if the game were replayed. It was an upset. You can't have it both ways Swoosh. Talk shit because it was an upset and then argue that Stanford was the better team. Duh of course they were. The only other team to get the better of them was super physical and played pretty direct.
Click to expand...

Informative response.
 
Swoosh said:
I don't think Santa Clara is a poser of a possession team (assuming that's who may be referring to). He has flat out said he knew he would be without the possession and thus outshot.
Click to expand...

Getting outpossessed doesn't mean that you are not a possession team. There are only a handful of teams that can line up and go toe to toe with Stanford purely based upon talent. That is where tactics and good coaching come in. Who else could I be referring to?
 
KidGretzky25 said:
She's doing a really good job with the team. Their style of play is one of the best in the country. Karina coming in early and Pugh and Sanchez on the way will make for a very good 2017.
Click to expand...

Pugh, Sanchez, Canales, Athens, Faulknor and others will be fine additions. Gonna be tough for anybody looking for significant minutes with 9 starters returning and another 4 that played significant minutes. There are only going to be 18 players in the spring so the big class will help with depth. It's going to be tough to break into the top 18 but I could see them playing 20 this season with the fact that there are going to be quite a few blowouts. Cromwell is an excellent tactician and manager of personalities so they will be fine.
 
MakeAPlay said:
What I am saying is they look to possess the ball. Not many teams are going to outpossess Stanford based upon the players that they have. When Santa Clara had the ball they weren't simply booting it forward. Of course Stanford would when the majority of the time if the game were replayed. It was an upset. You can't have it both ways Swoosh. Talk shit because it was an upset and then argue that Stanford was the better team. Duh of course they were. The only other team to get the better of them was super physical and played pretty direct.
Click to expand...
You are funny with your kickball and pretty direct digs. You need to rewatch the game. We almost exclusively play out the back and thru the midfield. We do play more than I care with the 30 yard entry ball to a post up forward and play back then typically out wide. That will change next year. But the roofer that Andrews scored was hardly direct. The second goal was fortunate with the keeper way off her line and the lob over. The third goal was a 4 pass sequence that originated when my kid stole the ball and we had a walk in goal. Further, we out shot, out shot on goal and obviously scored 3 goals. Possession was probably 50 -50 but maybe when I am bored over the holidays I will put the machine on it. I will grant you that UCLA did out possess us handily at Stub Hub and kudos to a good game but you were still outshot 20 - 11 and SOG was 7 -2.
 
pulguita said:
You are funny with your kickball and pretty direct digs. You need to rewatch the game. We almost exclusively play out the back and thru the midfield. We do play more than I care with the 30 yard entry ball to a post up forward and play back then typically out wide. That will change next year. But the roofer that Andrews scored was hardly direct. The second goal was fortunate with the keeper way off her line and the lob over. The third goal was a 4 pass sequence that originated when my kid stole the ball and we had a walk in goal. Further, we out shot, out shot on goal and obviously scored 3 goals. Possession was probably 50 -50 but maybe when I am bored over the holidays I will put the machine on it. I will grant you that UCLA did out possess us handily at Stub Hub and kudos to a good game but you were still outshot 20 - 11 and SOG was 7 -2.
Click to expand...

Hey I'm cheering for your kiddo this weekend. A rising tide raises all the ships. They thoroughly beat Stanford without a doubt. Good luck to you and yours and Happy Thanksgiving!
 
MakeAPlay said:
Hey I'm cheering for your kiddo this weekend. A rising tide raises all the ships. They thoroughly beat Stanford without a doubt. Good luck to you and yours and Happy Thanksgiving!
Click to expand...
WOE. Humility? I wasn't ready for that. Better kiss your loved ones because the world could be coming to an end.
 
pulguita said:
I will grant you that UCLA did out possess us handily at Stub Hub and kudos to a good game but you were still outshot 20 - 11 and SOG was 7 -2.
Click to expand...

Regarding the game at Stub Hub. 13 of those 20 shots came down the stretch and most were from way outside the 18. There were only about 2 shots that tested the keeper and UCLA almost walked in 2 other goals. UCLA forced the Trojans to chase and they were very direct in that game. Not to mention how physical the Trojans are. I am curious as to what they are going to do on defense next year. They will have plenty of attacking pieces but what about in the back? If I was a Bruin supporter I would be feeling pretty good with 9 returning starters and 13 players that played significant minutes as well as 3 U20 WNT players and a full Canadian WNT player coming in not to mention 2 U18 WNT players and a U17 WNT player and who knows what foreign players are going to pop up on or after signing day.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Maybe your right, I am a little uptight after losing my election. Why would someone attack me so early in the morning about an issue between me and the seahag? None of Cals business. I did not start this. I was planning on a road tip up north to watch Cal in the tourney but they didn't make it out of the first round, maybe that is why Cal is in a foul mood.
Map and Cal, losers, misery loves company.
Click to expand...

Who's the loser here. Your daughter is still chasing her college scholarship. Mine is going to a top 25 academic institution paid for mostly by a game that she loves. You are railing on somebody who's kid is doing what yours dreams about and at the same time getting straight A's at a top 25 academic institution. You are also calling a woman a hag because she is making you look silly. You look like a complete idiot to most intelligent people. What do you add to the conversation? Your kid plays for a second rate club run by someone in it for the money not the girls.

I'm completely shocked that someone living in such an obviously glass house would want to start throwing stones.

You are pathetic and quite honestly beneath me.
 
Legendary FC said:
Who's the loser here. Your daughter is still chasing her college scholarship. Mine is going to a top 25 academic institution paid for mostly by a game that she loves. You are railing on somebody who's kid is doing what yours dreams about and at the same time getting straight A's at a top 25 academic institution. You are also calling a woman a hag because she is making you look silly. You look like a complete idiot to most intelligent people. What do you add to the conversation? Your kid plays for a second rate club run by someone in it for the money not the girls.

I'm completely shocked that someone living in such an obviously glass house would want to start throwing stones.

You are pathetic and quite honestly beneath me.
Click to expand...
Why do you feel it is any of your business?
 
Legendary FC said:
Who's the loser here. Your daughter is still chasing her college scholarship. Mine is going to a top 25 academic institution paid for mostly by a game that she loves. You are railing on somebody who's kid is doing what yours dreams about and at the same time getting straight A's at a top 25 academic institution. You are also calling a woman a hag because she is making you look silly. You look like a complete idiot to most intelligent people. What do you add to the conversation? Your kid plays for a second rate club run by someone in it for the money not the girls.

I'm completely shocked that someone living in such an obviously glass house would want to start throwing stones.

You are pathetic and quite honestly beneath me.
Click to expand...
Do you know me?
Are you dating MAP?
What club is my daughter with?
What scholarship/college is she chasing?
Why do you think you are better than I am?
Typical LIB, POS, ELITIST.
BTW The Donald Won.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top