2016-17 D1 Women's soccer thread!!!

Regardless of where my player plays I'm not too concerned with her playing time as she is absolutely indispensable on the soccer field and she is in school for an education first and foremost and is doing great at that. If you are truly concerned about her though there aren't more than 3 players in the entire country that are better than her at her position right now and next year there won't be any.

Thanks for the well wishes.

No shortage of confidence from Mom/Dad either!
 
Ha ha! Better late than never on the response I suppose. It carried more relevance at the time I sent it as the Bruins were down 0-1 to Cal at the time.

I cannot see Cal winning the Pac-12 title. How can a team that got beat by St. Mary's be expected to come up big in big games? I know they tied UCLA and beat SC but Cal is a perennial runner up. Not to mention their epic tear of early exits from the NCAA tourney. UCLA hasn't looked as dominant of late and neither has Stanford or SC. Maybe Colorado continues to get thoroughly dominated in every statistical category and keeps on winning? My money is definitely NOT on Cal.

Yes, next year UCLA should be a juggernaut. The USYWNT teams were also supposed to be juggernauts and we all know how those runs ended. Let's see what the chemistry looks like once all that talent is together and fighting one another for playing time. In fact, no disrespect, but how will your DD fair next year once all those studs arrive in Westwood? Hopefully, she will continue to see ample playing time.

Looking forward to the "bath".


Cal has the best 3 forward combo in the country and although everyone talks about how great Stanford's defense is they are vulnerable at right back were Onomonu plays for Cal. Add Ship in who is a defensive nightmare at the 9 with her technique and Kim on the right who is the fastest player in the Pac 12. In the midfield they have Fletcher who is very solid and a quick counter attacking mentality and they are problematic. If they win out and draw or beat Stanford the math says they win. Even if they lose to Stanford they get a piece depending upon the LA outcome. I'm not going out on a limb here. They have the most paths to victory. Basically Cal just has to beat the mountain schools and the Arizona schools and they get a piece of the title
 
Cal has the best 3 forward combo in the country and although everyone talks about how great Stanford's defense is they are vulnerable at right back were Onomonu plays for Cal. Add Ship in who is a defensive nightmare at the 9 with her technique and Kim on the right who is the fastest player in the Pac 12. In the midfield they have Fletcher who is very solid and a quick counter attacking mentality and they are problematic. If they win out and draw or beat Stanford the math says they win. Even if they lose to Stanford they get a piece depending upon the LA outcome. I'm not going out on a limb here. They have the most paths to victory. Basically Cal just has to beat the mountain schools and the Arizona schools and they get a piece of the title
Cal is the quiet assassin in the Pac-12 right now. I agree their three in front are as good as any, with BYU's.
 
I dont know if MAP's daughter plays for UCLA.
There seems to be a connection with Duke as well, but if MAP wishes to remain anonymous, which she or he obviously does, why play that game?
I know there's bad blood, as MAP has played that silly game before, and continues to, but I think it takes away from the thread.
How about anyone who wants to play identify the poster, first identify themselves with a picture and a short bio?
Great idea except some people on here like to take things a bit too far for my comfort level. As far as anyone knows, my kids are mathletes and I stumbled across this site by accident while searching for "SoCal Isosceles Forum".

I have nothing against MAP. She/he knows her/his stuff, has strong takes and runs some epic smack. She/he does speak highly of her/his DD and her skills so I am genuinely interested who she plays for. If she/he wishes to remain anonymous I respect that but it is a bit ironic that she has identified others (including their daughters) by name and completely eviscertate them from a position of relative anonymity.

I genuinely wish all parents & their DD's well regardless of where they play or at what level.
 
Great idea except some people on here like to take things a bit too far for my comfort level. As far as anyone knows, my kids are mathletes and I stumbled across this site by accident while searching for "SoCal Isosceles Forum".

I have nothing against MAP. She/he knows her/his stuff, has strong takes and runs some epic smack. She/he does speak highly of her/his DD and her skills so I am genuinely interested who she plays for. If she/he wishes to remain anonymous I respect that but it is a bit ironic that she has identified others (including their daughters) by name and completely eviscertate them from a position of relative anonymity.

I genuinely wish all parents & their DD's well raegradless of where they play or at what level.
Agreed.
My take is that someone has to be the bigger man.
If MAP wants to continue to play that game, there will be an inevitable backlash .
I personally could give a crap that people know who I am. I think its really low to disparage or show people's kids in a bad light, or use them by name as tools to attack their parents.
It seems like we are coming to a point, at least at the college level thread, where we can get past that and talk positively about the few years we have left to enjoy and watch our kids play.
I think MAP and NoGoal are on board, so lets not get off track.
If this thing works out, Ill next be heading to the middle east to broker a peace agreement.
 
Nothing wrong with smack talking, as long as we can take it back, and understand where it ends.
The old kitchen, and the new "off topic" forum has always been contentious, even downright, nasty, but there has always been discretion where family is involved.
 
As for smack talking, posters need to know....if you engage in it. Don't count on your cloke of invisibility, because there are many posters who figure you are are.

Example: Speed I haven't paid any attention to your posts, but it seems like your DD is in the recruitng phase and you have been following Pepperdine and Pac12 games.
 
As for smack talking, posters need to know....if you engage in it. Don't count on your cloke of invisibility, because there are many posters who figure you are are.

Example: Speed I haven't paid any attention to your posts, but it seems like your DD is in the recruitng phase and you have been following Pepperdine and Pac12 games.
It's always been like that.
But, there was an understanding that talking smack about players and identifying them was off limits.
Now their are some that seemingly find joy in stalking players & their parents.....
 
Cal?
The same St. Mary's beat 2-0 earlier this year?
That Cal?
The same St. Mary's that lost to Pepperdine 2-0?
Interesting.
 
It's always been like that.
But, there was an understanding that talking smack about players and identifying them was off limits.
Now their are some that seemingly find joy in stalking players & their parents.....

The unwritten rule has been don't name underage kids in a negative light. If under age it has to be in a postitive light like, ODP, YNT, etc!
 
Cal?
The same St. Mary's beat 2-0 earlier this year?
That Cal?
The same St. Mary's that lost to Pepperdine 2-0?
Interesting.
This is poor deductive reasoning and is a proven fallacy.

A beats B, C beats A doesn't = C beats B. Example: UHC Rousey beats Tate, Holms beats Rousey, but Tate beats Holms.
 
You said that, not me.
It was inferred in your post though and why you posted it. You just didn't post directly, how can CAL win the Pac12 when they lost to St Mary's and Pepperdine beat St Mary's.

Similiar to Trump inferring that 2nd amendment people need to do somehing to HRC to keep their guns or something in that manner.
 
It was inferred in your post though and why you posted it. You just didn't post directly, how can CAL win the Pac12 when they lost to St Mary's and Pepperdine beat St Mary's.

Similiar to Trump inferring that 2nd amendment people need to do somehing to HRC to keep their guns or something in that manner.


Granted, I have been known to post things to encourage thought and discussion.
Funny what some folks think...whatever you're thinking is not anything I was thinking or inferring.
Interesting......
Wondering... what's with you and the dumb icon?
 
Granted, I have been known to post things to encourage thought and discussion.
Funny what some folks think...whatever you're thinking is not anything I was thinking or inferring.
Interesting......
Wondering... what's with you and the dumb icon?
If you haven't figured it out yet, maybe you suffer from PCS.
 
Nothing wrong with smack talking, as long as we can take it back, and understand where it ends.
The old kitchen, and the new "off topic" forum has always been contentious, even downright, nasty, but there has always been discretion where family is involved.

I'm not talking smack. I think Pepperdine is good. I think Bernie's daughter is good. The only person that I get personal with is he with the multiple personalities. I like it when SoCal kids do well regardless of what team they play for or club that they came from.
 
I'm not talking smack. I think Pepperdine is good. I think Bernie's daughter is good. The only person that I get personal with is he with the multiple personalities. I like it when SoCal kids do well regardless of what team they play for or club that they came from.
My kid is better than good.
Pepperdine is going to make waves.
She can play any position on the field, except goalie.
She seems to be settling in at holding, which I think suits her.
I get it.
Like I said, smack talk is good, as long as we're all adults who can take it as well as we give it.

Two puns and a brag for extra credit.
 
Back
Top