Interesting letter from SoCal League, re referee issues

I watch the EPL constantly and there's no hesitation to call a foul in the middle of the field if there's a hard jersey grab and it's nowhere near a clear breakaway or shot on goal. Simply a player stopping a counter attack. It does get called and frequently earns a yellow. It's not what I would consider "serious" as in an injury risk but it's 101% deliberate.
“Hard” is doing a lot of work there.

In any case it’s likely a yellow for spa (if not red for dogso) which they do look out for, rather than reckless or serious foul play cards. You can’t have spa or dogso on a corner, nor on a corner can you call an ordinary non misconduct foul without the ball being in play.
 
Refs are illegal immigrants and getting exploited? LOL
If a business cant exist without illegal immigrant labor multiple groups are being exploited. Citizens wages are being exploited via lower rates paid to illegals. In general citizens social services networks are being exploited because taxes arent being paid on wages. Illegals are being exploited because they have no other options to make money. The exploitation part comes in because illegals wouldn't choose to make less money than citizens if they had other options.

This is just another example of soccer choosing to do something that enables poor business practices. Participants refuse to change in ways what would enable more ethical business practices. They then pretend things cant be changed yet I showed multiple ways to do this.

Read this book. It will open your eyes. It doesn't specifically call out the ethical issues around hiring illegals. But it does cover business ethics in a youth soccer club context and the writing is pretty good.

 
“Hard” is doing a lot of work there.

In any case it’s likely a yellow for spa (if not red for dogso) which they do look out for, rather than reckless or serious foul play cards. You can’t have spa or dogso on a corner, nor on a corner can you call an ordinary non misconduct foul without the ball being in play.
A lot of work? Grace, there are jersey grabs to slow and there are jersey grabs to stop. We all know them when we see them.

I would argue wrapping your arms around a forward, on a corner kick, is MORE than a SPA. Doesn't matter if the ball is in play or not.
 
A lot of work? Grace, there are jersey grabs to slow and there are jersey grabs to stop. We all know them when we see them.

I would argue wrapping your arms around a forward, on a corner kick, is MORE than a SPA. Doesn't matter if the ball is in play or not.
If a team knows that their opponent is going to grab players jerseys why let the jerseys be grab-able?

In American football lineman jerseys are skin tight specifically so opponents cant grab them.

I know the answer is skin tight jerseys wouldn't look cool in soccer. Which is why teams dont have them. Just pointing out another hypocrisy in soccer that keeps everyone complaining but nothing really changes.
 
If a team knows that their opponent is going to grab players jerseys why let the jerseys be grab-able?

In American football lineman jerseys are skin tight specifically so opponents cant grab them.

I know the answer is skin tight jerseys wouldn't look cool in soccer. Which is why teams dont have them. Just pointing out another hypocrisy in soccer that keeps everyone complaining but nothing really changes.
I would make jerseys very easy to rip and have a policy that parents are responsible to pay for a replacement. That will stop jersey grabbing very quickly.
 
If a business cant exist without illegal immigrant labor multiple groups are being exploited. Citizens wages are being exploited via lower rates paid to illegals. In general citizens social services networks are being exploited because taxes arent being paid on wages. Illegals are being exploited because they have no other options to make money. The exploitation part comes in because illegals wouldn't choose to make less money than citizens if they had other options.

This is just another example of soccer choosing to do something that enables poor business practices. Participants refuse to change in ways what would enable more ethical business practices. They then pretend things cant be changed yet I showed multiple ways to do this.

Read this book. It will open your eyes. It doesn't specifically call out the ethical issues around hiring illegals. But it does cover business ethics in a youth soccer club context and the writing is pretty good.

Maybe you should focus more on your kids development
 
If a team knows that their opponent is going to grab players jerseys why let the jerseys be grab-able?

In American football lineman jerseys are skin tight specifically so opponents cant grab them.

I know the answer is skin tight jerseys wouldn't look cool in soccer. Which is why teams dont have them. Just pointing out another hypocrisy in soccer that keeps everyone complaining but nothing really changes.
Skin tight jerseys on soccer players would look a helluva lot better than offensive lineman. But on things like corners, where you're allowing arms wrapped around a striker, that needs to stop and stop now.

They're a lot more snug than they used to be.

1758303198181.png 1758304004936.jpeg
 
It seems like a lot of people have taken time to complain about the ref protection policy and state the obvious. I am in complete agreement with everyone's frustration and anger at this as I have first hand experienced calls against player on our team that were egregious, fundamentally incorrect and also biased, both racially as well as against our team.

I took the time to file the complaints. Pursued them all the way through each SoCal Soccer body and get actual tangible results.

While the letter and the policies appear to state otherwise, the truth is that we have options as parents and coaches. It is up to hold them leagues and referees accountable for their actions. All the referees and leagues are governed under SafeSport and US Soccer. Their jurisdiction and policies supersede those set by the local league.

I am sharing links to both where they outline the steps to file a complaint as well as the protections in place for all. Instead of creating a scenario of aggression, violence, anger etc on the field, it is my suggestion that you look through these options and file the relevant complaints with supporting evidence as often as possible. This will force the local leagues and referee associations to be held to a higher standard.

SafeSport Code:

US Soccer SafeSport Complaints Procedure and Links:

Secondary Contact Info and Complaints Form:

Up to date database of Disciplined, Suspended or Ineligible Individuals (Coaches, referees, staff etc)
https://learning.ussoccer.com/directory/safesport-disciplinary-database

Hope this information helps us put pressure on the leagues and ref associations by attempting to address the shortcomings in a better manner.
 
Fwiw, I have seen no evidence that any of the nominal mechanisms for reporting or escalating complaints actually have any tangible effect, at the end of the day(s) (aside from your statement above).

What I have seen first and second hand, multiple times, is SoCal League in specific intentionally turning a blind eye toward obvious cases of abuse and misconduct (and not just by officials). See, for example, their refusal to even look at video evidence of misconduct, even if the parents or teams provide explicit, clear, indisputable video evidence of such, because they are that dead-set on ignoring the issues they falsely purport to take "very seriously". Maybe other organizations (US Soccer, other) are better about this, but my perception is that SoCal League at least is entirely disingenuous in their attempts to ensure parents that their ref abuse policy is not entirely one-sided and extremely ripe for abuse (as we have already seen first hand this season).
 
It seems like a lot of people have taken time to complain about the ref protection policy and state the obvious. I am in complete agreement with everyone's frustration and anger at this as I have first hand experienced calls against player on our team that were egregious, fundamentally incorrect and also biased, both racially as well as against our team.

I took the time to file the complaints. Pursued them all the way through each SoCal Soccer body and get actual tangible results.

While the letter and the policies appear to state otherwise, the truth is that we have options as parents and coaches. It is up to hold them leagues and referees accountable for their actions. All the referees and leagues are governed under SafeSport and US Soccer. Their jurisdiction and policies supersede those set by the local league.

I am sharing links to both where they outline the steps to file a complaint as well as the protections in place for all. Instead of creating a scenario of aggression, violence, anger etc on the field, it is my suggestion that you look through these options and file the relevant complaints with supporting evidence as often as possible. This will force the local leagues and referee associations to be held to a higher standard.

SafeSport Code:

US Soccer SafeSport Complaints Procedure and Links:

Secondary Contact Info and Complaints Form:

Up to date database of Disciplined, Suspended or Ineligible Individuals (Coaches, referees, staff etc)
https://learning.ussoccer.com/directory/safesport-disciplinary-database

Hope this information helps us put pressure on the leagues and ref associations by attempting to address the shortcomings in a better manner.

Curious - what tangible results did you get from your efforts?

I am not trying to pick a fight or discount your experience, at face value I believe you.

But I've been at this over 9 years and reffed ~ 1,700 matches. I can count the # of times I've seen a referee do something inappropriate on one hand (telling a 17 year to STFU accounts for two of those). Biased against a particular team? I suppose. Just don't hear a lot of conversations around the ref tent where people are conspiring to screw over FC whoever. To what end? Local club, out of town, big club, small club, this league, that league ... I just don't care who wins.

Racially biased? Again, I'm skeptical. In these parts the ethnic make up of the referee pool generally matches the teams. From the referee side - what's the point? Because my skin color is purple I'm out to get the green skinned teams? Really?

Calls that are fundamentally / egregiously wrong? Sure. In any given match I imagine you can find decisions that should have gone the other way. This happens at the highest level of the sport - calls get overturned by the Premier League review panel all the time. And that's with huge quantities of HD cameras to show every angle. Expecting the same from your average U13 match seems unrealistic.

Hold referees accountable? Like, for what? And how? A lot of referees are learning the game, just like the kids are. I appreciate it's frustrating to watch when you think a bad call has impacted your team. But the hard truth is most parents / coaches either aren't qualified to determine good/bad call or aren't in the right position to judge.

Does the referee crew for your game show up on time? Do they look professional (shirts tucked in, socks pulled up)? Do they appear to be making a effort to keep up with play (AR even w/ 2nd to last, center close to challenges)? When the center blows their whistle for a foul, how far away was the foul? 10-15 yards in optimal. If you answer yes to these 3 questions, my suggestion is to let the rest go. Will people get calls wrong? Yes. In the grand scheme, does it really matter? I suggest probably not. But this one time, this referee didn't give us a PK which meant we didn't win the uber silver bracket of the Grand Mega Super Cup. Right. Do a google search for the hand of god goal or T. Henry in WC qualifying.

Are there referees that don't meet the above criteria? Yes. Some of those are new and are learning. Hope is they are paired with more experienced people and they learn the ropes. Some could stand to work harder. In general those folks stay with the lower level leagues. That's another hard truth - the higher the league (ECNL / MLS Next / EA / DPL), the more experienced referees you get. Less so with our State & Open leagues. Doesn't mean all the alphabet league refs are perfect or the lower league refs are garbage.

Hope some of the above resonates.
 
But I've been at this over 9 years and reffed ~ 1,700 matches. I can count the # of times I've seen a referee do something inappropriate on one hand (telling a 17 year to STFU accounts for two of those). Biased against a particular team? I suppose. Just don't hear a lot of conversations around the ref tent where people are conspiring to screw over FC whoever. To what end? Local club, out of town, big club, small club, this league, that league ... I just don't care who wins.

Racially biased? Again, I'm skeptical. In these parts the ethnic make up of the referee pool generally matches the teams. From the referee side - what's the point? Because my skin color is purple I'm out to get the green skinned teams? Really?
It's probably a good thing that you haven't seen much of this or experienced it. In other areas, it is a much more significant issue and comes up all the time. Sometimes it may be as you describe, and people just looking for any excuse for why the match didn't go their way. But unfortunately, there are those times where this just can't be discounted - it's real, and it occurs more often than most all of us would prefer.
 
But I've been at this over 9 years and reffed ~ 1,700 matches. I can count the # of times I've seen a referee do something inappropriate on one hand (telling a 17 year to STFU accounts for two of those). Biased against a particular team? I suppose. Just don't hear a lot of conversations around the ref tent where people are conspiring to screw over FC whoever. To what end? Local club, out of town, big club, small club, this league, that league ... I just don't care who wins.
I know you aren't responding to me, but fwiw, I'll give you the top 3 instances which I would consider to be "bad", in terms of ref behavior and/or performance. I will also preface by saying I've officiated a lot of games also, I've watched a lot of games, and this is by no means a common occurrence, and I don't want to imply such. But, these are the refs which I would have reported, if I felt there was any path to getting any tangible results.

1. In a recent game, a ref carded a coach for coming onto the field to check on his player, for a head injury, which the ref had stopped play already for. The ref was power-tripping all game, and seemingly felt slighted that the coach hadn't waited to be waived on.

2. An official witnessed repeated racial slurs from a player, and did nothing. The team with the player who was being denigrated eventually stopped playing the game and protested it, presenting video evidence to the league (SoCal League). The league did nothing: no change to the forfeit, no reprimand for the refs, no action against the other player, despite their clearly-stated "zero tolerance" policy and clear video evidence (apparently for SoCal League, this means "use whatever racial slurs you want, we could care less").

3. We had an official in a tournament who was so laughably corrupt that the coaches were literally laughing on the sideline at how ridiculous his calls were, by 20min into the game. There was a whole list of calls which were too bad to be anything but intentionally one-sided, but two I recall distinctly: in one instance he called a penalty kick on a tackle which he afterwards admitted to the player was entirely clean, but he just considered it subjectively dangerous, and one where he called a foul on a player who was thrown to the ground by the opposing player (and literally every player on the field from both teams was confused, but the call was not changed). This was at Silverlakes, and he was cheating to help Legends FC win, which a later came to understand was somewhat common there though, through word of mouth.

Those are the top instances which come to my mind, fwiw.
 
I know you aren't responding to me, but fwiw, I'll give you the top 3 instances which I would consider to be "bad", in terms of ref behavior and/or performance. I will also preface by saying I've officiated a lot of games also, I've watched a lot of games, and this is by no means a common occurrence, and I don't want to imply such. But, these are the refs which I would have reported, if I felt there was any path to getting any tangible results.

1. In a recent game, a ref carded a coach for coming onto the field to check on his player, for a head injury, which the ref had stopped play already for. The ref was power-tripping all game, and seemingly felt slighted that the coach hadn't waited to be waived on.

2. An official witnessed repeated racial slurs from a player, and did nothing. The team with the player who was being denigrated eventually stopped playing the game and protested it, presenting video evidence to the league (SoCal League). The league did nothing: no change to the forfeit, no reprimand for the refs, no action against the other player, despite their clearly-stated "zero tolerance" policy and clear video evidence (apparently for SoCal League, this means "use whatever racial slurs you want, we could care less").

3. We had an official in a tournament who was so laughably corrupt that the coaches were literally laughing on the sideline at how ridiculous his calls were, by 20min into the game. There was a whole list of calls which were too bad to be anything but intentionally one-sided, but two I recall distinctly: in one instance he called a penalty kick on a tackle which he afterwards admitted to the player was entirely clean, but he just considered it subjectively dangerous, and one where he called a foul on a player who was thrown to the ground by the opposing player (and literally every player on the field from both teams was confused, but the call was not changed). This was at Silverlakes, and he was cheating to help Legends FC win, which a later came to understand was somewhat common there though, through word of mouth.

Those are the top instances which come to my mind, fwiw.
You had me until the part about a ref cheating to help Legends FC.

We all know that Legends FC cheats on their own and doesnt need any help in that regard from the refs.
 
Curious - what tangible results did you get from your efforts?

I am not trying to pick a fight or discount your experience, at face value I believe you.

But I've been at this over 9 years and reffed ~ 1,700 matches. I can count the # of times I've seen a referee do something inappropriate on one hand (telling a 17 year to STFU accounts for two of those). Biased against a particular team? I suppose. Just don't hear a lot of conversations around the ref tent where people are conspiring to screw over FC whoever. To what end? Local club, out of town, big club, small club, this league, that league ... I just don't care who wins.

Racially biased? Again, I'm skeptical. In these parts the ethnic make up of the referee pool generally matches the teams. From the referee side - what's the point? Because my skin color is purple I'm out to get the green skinned teams? Really?

Calls that are fundamentally / egregiously wrong? Sure. In any given match I imagine you can find decisions that should have gone the other way. This happens at the highest level of the sport - calls get overturned by the Premier League review panel all the time. And that's with huge quantities of HD cameras to show every angle. Expecting the same from your average U13 match seems unrealistic.

Hold referees accountable? Like, for what? And how? A lot of referees are learning the game, just like the kids are. I appreciate it's frustrating to watch when you think a bad call has impacted your team. But the hard truth is most parents / coaches either aren't qualified to determine good/bad call or aren't in the right position to judge.

Does the referee crew for your game show up on time? Do they look professional (shirts tucked in, socks pulled up)? Do they appear to be making a effort to keep up with play (AR even w/ 2nd to last, center close to challenges)? When the center blows their whistle for a foul, how far away was the foul? 10-15 yards in optimal. If you answer yes to these 3 questions, my suggestion is to let the rest go. Will people get calls wrong? Yes. In the grand scheme, does it really matter? I suggest probably not. But this one time, this referee didn't give us a PK which meant we didn't win the uber silver bracket of the Grand Mega Super Cup. Right. Do a google search for the hand of god goal or T. Henry in WC qualifying.

Are there referees that don't meet the above criteria? Yes. Some of those are new and are learning. Hope is they are paired with more experienced people and they learn the ropes. Some could stand to work harder. In general those folks stay with the lower level leagues. That's another hard truth - the higher the league (ECNL / MLS Next / EA / DPL), the more experienced referees you get. Less so with our State & Open leagues. Doesn't mean all the alphabet league refs are perfect or the lower league refs are garbage.

Hope some of the above resonates.
Two of the major other complaints are referees who are afraid to game manage (or who don't believe in it because we ought to "let em play") by using their cards and the game gets away from them....that's a safety issue for which there should be instruction to improve. It's not just that a call should be overturned, but the refs probably need some feed back to improve and that system just isn't in place because there aren't enough instructors and that would cost $$$$$.

The other is referees who are not in shape enough for the game which they are doing and for some it's time to hang it up (like the ones who just stay glued to the center circle).

The reality, though, is there's a shortage (because we don't pay refs enough so you get what you pay for) and there isn't a fix for this with current numbers. Refs who are not ready or who are not fit will be thrown into games for which they cannot manage.
 
Two of the major other complaints are referees who are afraid to game manage (or who don't believe in it because we ought to "let em play") by using their cards and the game gets away from them....that's a safety issue for which there should be instruction to improve. It's not just that a call should be overturned, but the refs probably need some feed back to improve and that system just isn't in place because there aren't enough instructors and that would cost $$$$$.

The other is referees who are not in shape enough for the game which they are doing and for some it's time to hang it up (like the ones who just stay glued to the center circle).

The reality, though, is there's a shortage (because we don't pay refs enough so you get what you pay for) and there isn't a fix for this with current numbers. Refs who are not ready or who are not fit will be thrown into games for which they cannot manage.
Agreed. I cringe when I see people not keeping up with play (we call those folks sprinklers ... they just stand in the center circle and rotate). To be fair, sometimes on the 5th or 6th game of the day in 100 degree heat it's tough to move. I do my best to limit myself to 3 a day (1 center, 2 lines is pretty standard) but here in AZ we get constant requests for more and more games ("these games will be canceled if we don't have at least a center, please help"). You can work yourself to death if you're not careful.

As mentioned more monitoring and feedback would be a huge help. Impossible to do without more $$$.
 
Agreed. I cringe when I see people not keeping up with play (we call those folks sprinklers ... they just stand in the center circle and rotate). To be fair, sometimes on the 5th or 6th game of the day in 100 degree heat it's tough to move. I do my best to limit myself to 3 a day (1 center, 2 lines is pretty standard) but here in AZ we get constant requests for more and more games ("these games will be canceled if we don't have at least a center, please help"). You can work yourself to death if you're not careful.

As mentioned more monitoring and feedback would be a huge help. Impossible to do without more $$$.
The reality is there's a shortage. It shouldn't be happening, period. Those experienced refs should be paid the $$$ to then go supervise and instruct new refs for $$$$, not running 5 games a day. The reality is that it creates a safety concern because if a ref is too tired or too unhealthy to be in position its going to create potentially a danger for players because the ref can't see the whole field. But raising ref fees would mean soccer fees would go up and people are already complaining about how the less well off can't afford soccer so it's a rich person's sport.

my son has recently taken up CR as a youth ref for AYSO and he has the benefit of me sitting their as his supervisor keeping the parents/coaches in line and helping keep his eye in the correct place which I personally think is the hardest thing about centering: you got to watch the players around the ball, the linesman for the flag, the watch, the players off the ball, and think about where the ball is going without putting yourself in the awkward position of getting hit by it. Despite my count now up to 50+ games as a CR, I still don't 100% have the hang of it and I consider myself a barely competent ref worthy of free AYSO but not yet "good" though I'm pretty close to getting there. There have, for example, been some calls over the years that went against my GK kid that just had me thinking God the refs are all really prejudiced against GKs (like egregious stuff like my kid having control of the ball under the laws but the striker slides studs up into him). I've come to realize that it is more often than not because the ref (not wanting to get hit by the ball and having to trail young fast male strikers) are often viewing it from the back of the head of the strikers and the ARs are so focused on watching the offside (God forbid the ball goes wide and they can't tell if the keeper touches it for a goalkick or corner) which they are still learning that they don't look for it.
 
Curious - what tangible results did you get from your efforts?

I am not trying to pick a fight or discount your experience, at face value I believe you.

But I've been at this over 9 years and reffed ~ 1,700 matches. I can count the # of times I've seen a referee do something inappropriate on one hand (telling a 17 year to STFU accounts for two of those). Biased against a particular team? I suppose. Just don't hear a lot of conversations around the ref tent where people are conspiring to screw over FC whoever. To what end? Local club, out of town, big club, small club, this league, that league ... I just don't care who wins.

Racially biased? Again, I'm skeptical. In these parts the ethnic make up of the referee pool generally matches the teams. From the referee side - what's the point? Because my skin color is purple I'm out to get the green skinned teams? Really?

Calls that are fundamentally / egregiously wrong? Sure. In any given match I imagine you can find decisions that should have gone the other way. This happens at the highest level of the sport - calls get overturned by the Premier League review panel all the time. And that's with huge quantities of HD cameras to show every angle. Expecting the same from your average U13 match seems unrealistic.

Hold referees accountable? Like, for what? And how? A lot of referees are learning the game, just like the kids are. I appreciate it's frustrating to watch when you think a bad call has impacted your team. But the hard truth is most parents / coaches either aren't qualified to determine good/bad call or aren't in the right position to judge.

Does the referee crew for your game show up on time? Do they look professional (shirts tucked in, socks pulled up)? Do they appear to be making a effort to keep up with play (AR even w/ 2nd to last, center close to challenges)? When the center blows their whistle for a foul, how far away was the foul? 10-15 yards in optimal. If you answer yes to these 3 questions, my suggestion is to let the rest go. Will people get calls wrong? Yes. In the grand scheme, does it really matter? I suggest probably not. But this one time, this referee didn't give us a PK which meant we didn't win the uber silver bracket of the Grand Mega Super Cup. Right. Do a google search for the hand of god goal or T. Henry in WC qualifying.

Are there referees that don't meet the above criteria? Yes. Some of those are new and are learning. Hope is they are paired with more experienced people and they learn the ropes. Some could stand to work harder. In general those folks stay with the lower level leagues. That's another hard truth - the higher the league (ECNL / MLS Next / EA / DPL), the more experienced referees you get. Less so with our State & Open leagues. Doesn't mean all the alphabet league refs are perfect or the lower league refs are garbage.

Hope some of the above resonates.
In the case where the referee calls were racially biased he was initially given a temporary suspension and then deemed permanently ineligible.

Subsequent to the final ruling by US Soccer we were able to successfully have DA press charges against the referee for a hate crime.

In another instance the referee was given probation and required to go through additional training prior to being allowed to ref again. This was in relation to our complaints that the referees calls were based on laws that were changed and they were officiating the game based on the wrong interpretation of the law.

Lastly, we had a referee suspended for failure to make calls during a tournament and referee the game to benefit the host clubs team.

To me these were all tangible and effective results.
 
The reality is there's a shortage. It shouldn't be happening, period. Those experienced refs should be paid the $$$ to then go supervise and instruct new refs for $$$$, not running 5 games a day. The reality is that it creates a safety concern because if a ref is too tired or too unhealthy to be in position its going to create potentially a danger for players because the ref can't see the whole field. But raising ref fees would mean soccer fees would go up and people are already complaining about how the less well off can't afford soccer so it's a rich person's sport.

my son has recently taken up CR as a youth ref for AYSO and he has the benefit of me sitting their as his supervisor keeping the parents/coaches in line and helping keep his eye in the correct place which I personally think is the hardest thing about centering: you got to watch the players around the ball, the linesman for the flag, the watch, the players off the ball, and think about where the ball is going without putting yourself in the awkward position of getting hit by it. Despite my count now up to 50+ games as a CR, I still don't 100% have the hang of it and I consider myself a barely competent ref worthy of free AYSO but not yet "good" though I'm pretty close to getting there. There have, for example, been some calls over the years that went against my GK kid that just had me thinking God the refs are all really prejudiced against GKs (like egregious stuff like my kid having control of the ball under the laws but the striker slides studs up into him). I've come to realize that it is more often than not because the ref (not wanting to get hit by the ball and having to trail young fast male strikers) are often viewing it from the back of the head of the strikers and the ARs are so focused on watching the offside (God forbid the ball goes wide and they can't tell if the keeper touches it for a goalkick or corner) which they are still learning that they don't look for it.
Referee's are actually well paid in SoCal soccer, especially given that most of their income is tax free. SoCal soccer league referees make approximately $60 an hour in cash. What you can do is make sure your club requests tax documents from the ref organization at the end of the season to keep this in check.

AYSO is volunteer but the rest of SoCal club/academy scene is paid.

Also dont forget SoCal has a huge adult league to where these referees have the opportunity to earn a very healthy living. To put it into perspective, working weekends and 1 night a week a CR is capable of earning upwards $1000 a week tax free. This is over 50k a year in cash or put in another way the equivalent of 70k a year but only working 2.5 days a week.

And to quantify this i am not just throwing random numbers out but refereed through college working some evenings and nights a week and was able to make close to 35k a year, 20 years ago, when i was just paid $27 to 40 as a solo CR as opposed to $66 now.
 
Fwiw, I have seen no evidence that any of the nominal mechanisms for reporting or escalating complaints actually have any tangible effect, at the end of the day(s) (aside from your statement above).

What I have seen first and second hand, multiple times, is SoCal League in specific intentionally turning a blind eye toward obvious cases of abuse and misconduct (and not just by officials). See, for example, their refusal to even look at video evidence of misconduct, even if the parents or teams provide explicit, clear, indisputable video evidence of such, because they are that dead-set on ignoring the issues they falsely purport to take "very seriously". Maybe other organizations (US Soccer, other) are better about this, but my perception is that SoCal League at least is entirely disingenuous in their attempts to ensure parents that their ref abuse policy is not entirely one-sided and extremely ripe for abuse (as we have already seen first hand this season).
We didnt see any tangible results or any results at all when we reached out to SoCal soccer or CalSouth ref body. That was the point at which i did some digging and made my way up the food chain. Involving SafeSport and US Soccer forces the regional bodies to get in line and actually do their due diligence in an investigation rather than just turning a blind eye.
 
Back
Top