For example --Fox News has similar pictures and claims of crowd sizes. I'm surprised he didn't know.
Last edited:
For example --Fox News has similar pictures and claims of crowd sizes. I'm surprised he didn't know.
It’s the rabbit hole theory, when in danger of reaching a point where one can’t deny reality attempt to circumvent the immediate perception with a barrage of circular questions leading nowhere. He’s just not that good at it, so it didn’t go far.Fox News has similar pictures and claims of crowd sizes. I'm surprised he didn't know.
In general, I won't ask for a link unless I already know where the object came from, and I want to question the poster's reason for hiding the attribution.It’s the rabbit hole theory, when in danger of reaching a point where one can’t deny reality attempt to circumvent the immediate perception with a barrage of circular questions leading nowhere. He’s just not that good at it, so it didn’t go far.
Why would you need to question yourself and ask yourself for a link? Listen espola, it's been fun debating you the last 7 years and I loved winning every hot topic we debated, but I think it's time you seek some help pal. I know a good Doc at Scripps. PM me and I'll give you, his name.In general, I won't ask for a link unless I already know where the object came from, and I want to question the poster's reason for hiding the attribution.
I have a few cross country maga friends that I mostly communicate with via FB or text that when cornered often resort to asking obscure questions designed to derail the topic they can’t easily defend. That or they claim ignorance, “I’ve never heard of that before?” (Which of course is often due to their news source choices)In general, I won't ask for a link unless I already know where the object came from, and I want to question the poster's reason for hiding the attribution.
Of course not. I'm sure something happened down there. I'm just asking about the picture in question you posted.Are you saying it didn't happen?
<<chuckle>>Stage 1, denial.
Funniest part about all these "No Kings" protests..we still don't have a King..nor have we ever. Clown world.
Kings don’t comply with laws they make their own. With every challenge we draw closer.Funniest part about all these "No Kings" protests..we still don't have a King..nor have we ever. Clown world.![]()
![]()
Holy Jesus, that was funny for first 4 and half minutes and then I was sickened by the two takes on homosexuality and abortion. Of course you would post such vile things. The GOP Jesus is not my Jesus and that stuff was funny. That actress was clueless about the Bible Jesus. Very wrong indeed, twisting the scriptures to suit her itching ears and yours, pervert.The secret for the followers of gop jesus is knowing when Jesus (the one in the Bible) was being sarcastic.
I might be wrong about Fox News (at least the national broadcast). See the link below at about 4:00 --Fox News has similar pictures and claims of crowd sizes. I'm surprised he didn't know.
I stand corrected. Dodgers suck!Cheers for the Dodgers!
![]()
Dodgers block ICE agents from entering stadium in Los Angeles, team says
The team reportedly had plans to announce assistance for immigrant communities in L.A. on Thursday.www.nbcnews.com
Now I have to go lie down to recover from the shock.
<<chuckle>>Kings don’t comply with laws they make their own. With every challenge we draw closer.
Some Padres fans (I know many of them) are more upset at the targeting of Tatis Jr. Some Padres fans are pleased that Schildt stood up for his players. Some Padres fans are not surprised at the behavior of Roberts -- he had a similar confrontation with former Padres manager Andy Green a few years ago.You all upset because one manager pushed another?! I could see if he sucker-punched him. But a little nudge??
You really are spineless. Typical Liberal. All bark..no bite when push comes to shove. (No pun intended)