Climate and Weather

16508023_1692865850724386_5233214351434513409_n.jpg
 
Irony: Environmentalists Protesting North Dakota Pipeline Left Behind Tons of Waste, Could Contaminate Waterways

In case you missed it, the legal and bureaucratic battle over the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines is finished. We won. President Donald J. Trump signed two executive orders to move forward with the projects. The Army Corp of Engineers signed off on the Dakota Access Pipeline’s final permit. And a judge refused to hear an appeal to block the project’s construction. After Trump won the 2016 election, it was only a matter of time before the incoming president would sign off on the projects. Hundreds of protestors flocked to Standing Rock Reservation in North Dakota to protest the pipeline’s construction, which activists say will desecrate their sacred burial grounds and would contaminate their drinking water along the 1,172-mile route.

There have been claims that Dakota Access LLC never consulted the local tribes about the pipeline. They were consulted 389 times. There are also archeologists on site just in case construction runs into a burial site.
 
Irony: Environmentalists Protesting North Dakota Pipeline Left Behind Tons of Waste, Could Contaminate Waterways

In case you missed it, the legal and bureaucratic battle over the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines is finished. We won. President Donald J. Trump signed two executive orders to move forward with the projects. The Army Corp of Engineers signed off on the Dakota Access Pipeline’s final permit. And a judge refused to hear an appeal to block the project’s construction. After Trump won the 2016 election, it was only a matter of time before the incoming president would sign off on the projects. Hundreds of protestors flocked to Standing Rock Reservation in North Dakota to protest the pipeline’s construction, which activists say will desecrate their sacred burial grounds and would contaminate their drinking water along the 1,172-mile route.

There have been claims that Dakota Access LLC never consulted the local tribes about the pipeline. They were consulted 389 times. There are also archeologists on site just in case construction runs into a burial site.
Spoiled, leftist, pigs.
They have no idea what reality looks like.
 
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2017/2/...st-feels-slighted-sets-world-afire-in-revenge

Each of the above scientists then proceeds to patiently and factually rebut Rose’s and Bates’ claims, point by point, graph by graph. I encourage you to check out the links to see what the debate is about.

You have posted crap...
The NOAA has been exposed, NASA and their cobbled data have been exposed.
Al Gore and his sack of dung have been exposed. Etc...
Of course the lying pieces of shit are going to circle the wagons, to protect the cash cow they've
created by falsifying data and bilking the countries/businesses that were coerced/manipulated into
this outrageous koolaid scheme.

You are a classic Johnny come lately to the table and slurping at the stale lies they have sold the lemming who'll
listen.
Weezy and the rest of the rodents are going to have egg on their faces when this fiasco is
finally exposed completely.
 
NASA GISS global average temperature anomaly for January 2017 has been posted as 92 (hundredths of a degree Celsius above the reference baseline). This is the second highest January in the GISS record, behind January 2016.

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt


100% Of US Warming Is Due To NOAA Data Tampering
Posted on December 28,2016 by Tony Heller
Climate Central just ran this piece, which the Washington Post picked up on. They claimed the US was “overwhelmingly hot” in 2016, and temperatures have risen 1,5°F since the 19th century.

Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.27.53-AM-down.gif

The U.S. Has Been Overwhelmingly Hot This Year | Climate Central

The first problem with their analysis is that the US had very little hot weather in 2016. The percentage of hot days was below average, and ranked 80th since 1895. Only 4.4% of days were over 95°F, compared with the long term average of 4.9%. Climate Central is conflating mild temperatures with hot ones.

Screen-Shot-2016-12-27-at-4.37.50-AM.gif


They also claim US temperatures rose 1.5°F since the 19th century, which is what NOAA shows.

Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.13.18-AM.gif


Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

The problem with the NOAA graph is that it is fake data. NOAA creates the warming trend by altering the data. The NOAA raw data shows no warming over the past century

Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-5.45.44-AM-1.gif

The adjustments being made are almost exactly 1.5°F, which is the claimed warming in the article.

Screen-Shot-2016-12-28-at-4.51.42-AM.gif


The adjustments correlate almost perfectly with atmospheric CO2. NOAA is adjusting the data to match global warming theory. This is known as PBEM (Policy Based Evidence Making.)
 
Back
Top