This issue concerns me a bit.
We have four kids. 2 play rec, 2 play club. We’ve not yet had to travel for a tournament.
Our 12 year old just signed on with a MLSn team. In his mind, I’m sure some of that was driven by the patch, and perceived prestige. First in his mind though, is the fact that this particular team for his age is the best team within a 45-60 min drive, and we’ve ruled out traveling. A few kids from this team have been scouted into academies, and he still wants to be a pro. The team he left is going e64, and I think it would have been a fine squad to play with this year, but the costs seemed similar, and this is what he wanted. We have friends on the team that can all share carpool duties, and the Phx/LV travel isn’t a problem for us personally. At this age, he’s not at all yet interested in HS soccer, and maybe he never becomes interested. For us, it seems workable and he choose the path. I’ll report back once we’re through the first season.
The main point is, this team will provide him the most competitive training environment this year, maybe by a lot. Tournaments and league aside, isn’t the training the kids actually run through just as important for development as anything else, if not most? If the best team you can play for is a ‘travel team’, it’s hard to choose, all else equal, a team that you perceive as weaker, isn’t it?
My youngest, turning 8, we’re strongly considering pulling from club after this coming season. We figure for what we pay, we can do flag football, futsal, private sessions, and AYSO for the same or less. If he stays in love with soccer, we’ll put him back in around 11. I think he’ll be a better athlete and player for it.
AYSO is great for my other two. They love it.