T 2.0

The proof attention to detail is important or was he set up by his staff?


Let's be honest, dipshit: Biden invited 15,000,000 ILLEGAL ALIENS here because he knew they were destitute, don't speak English, don't have employment and would be as dependent as ANYONE on government assistance. That's how libtards planned to buy more votes. Goes very nicely with, "it's racist to ask for I.D. when someone votes" and "we only let illegal immigrants vote in local elections now", doesn't it? And as someone that grew up with Mexican field workers in Central California, NOTHING says, "keep them working and living like starving dogs" better than continuing to bring them here illegally. Fucking disgraceful.

Stop insulting our intelligence. You TRIED, you LOST and now it's time you MOVE ON.
 
now it's time you MOVE ON.
For his own personal sanity, Yes (although it appears that ship has sailed). To insure continued defeat of progressives, No. Let them continue to side with 20% of the population and see how that works for them. I'm pretty good with math and I'm confident that 20% doesn't win elections.

Let's be honest, the Dems did something that was unimaginable and unprecedented...they made Trump look Presidential at the Joint Session of Congress.
 
For his own personal sanity, Yes (although it appears that ship has sailed). To insure continued defeat of progressives, No. Let them continue to side with 20% of the population and see how that works for them. I'm pretty good with math and I'm confident that 20% doesn't win elections.

Let's be honest, the Dems did something that was unimaginable and unprecedented...they made Trump look Presidential at the Joint Session of Congress.
Biden did it better.
 
When Stephen A. punches your ticket, it's time to grab a knife, some rope and join Brooks in the afterlife.
Did Rooster and Bogs ever get out like Andy? Those two caused so much harm to the prisoners at Shawshank. Now for family enjoyment, you can watch Shawshank live show on Broadway.


1741295666341.png
 
For his own personal sanity, Yes (although it appears that ship has sailed). To insure continued defeat of progressives, No. Let them continue to side with 20% of the population and see how that works for them. I'm pretty good with math and I'm confident that 20% doesn't win elections.

Let's be honest, the Dems did something that was unimaginable and unprecedented...they made Trump look Presidential at the Joint Session of Congress.
I give them credit for consistency.

1741299493680.png

 
I give them credit for consistency.

View attachment 26034

They need an Extreme Party Makeover. I have no idea who they're trying to appeal to. Complete lack of self awareness seems to be the required personality trait.

A healthy two party system is vital to our country, but if you want a pseudo dictatorship keep acting like complete fools. The Dems literally think effective opposition consists of 60's protest chants, mini paddle signs, pink dresses, stupid memes, tik tok videos, and tshirts printed with "resist".
 
They need an Extreme Party Makeover. I have no idea who they're trying to appeal to. Complete lack of self awareness seems to be the required personality trait.

A healthy two party system is vital to our country, but if you want a pseudo dictatorship keep acting like complete fools. The Dems literally think effective opposition consists of 60's protest chants, mini paddle signs, pink dresses, stupid memes, tik tok videos, and tshirts printed with "resist".
Is this the natural progression after years of:
- party “promotion” based on DEI
- shouting down or ignoring criticisms instead of engaging in debate
- holding consistently to hyperbolic, and false criticism of their primary challenger for the Presidency
- relying on the legacy media to sway the public to support their agenda?

The legacy media’s demise was big. So was the Twitter files in terms of shining light on their corruption. Twitter allowing free speech also hurt their cause.

The leaders they “developed” aren’t used to not having the advantages they had during their rise to power and are totally unequipped to win in the post-DEI era. As you say, until they become a political party responsive to their constituents (the 80/20 issues), they stand no chance of turning things around.
 
Is this the natural progression after years of:
- party “promotion” based on DEI
- shouting down or ignoring criticisms instead of engaging in debate
- holding consistently to hyperbolic, and false criticism of their primary challenger for the Presidency
- relying on the legacy media to sway the public to support their agenda?

The legacy media’s demise was big. So was the Twitter files in terms of shining light on their corruption. Twitter allowing free speech also hurt their cause.

The leaders they “developed” aren’t used to not having the advantages they had during their rise to power and are totally unequipped to win in the post-DEI era. As you say, until they become a political party responsive to their constituents (the 80/20 issues), they stand no chance of turning things around.
Joe has few ideas 😂😂😂

1741306656952.png
 
What happens when They & Them lose? They cheat instead to win. What happens if they can't cheat? They lie. What happens if they can't cheat or lie to win? They throw a hissy fit and look to start WW3.

1741308002987.png
 
Back
Top